Started By
Message

Mike Johnson Argues Congress Needs Stock Trading to 'Support Their Families'

Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:20 pm
Posted by Major Dutch Schaefer
Location: Classified
Member since Nov 2011
35575 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:20 pm
LINK

quote:

House Speaker Mike Johnson defended stock trading as a necessary income boost that allows members of Congress to "take care of their family."

Johnson noted that Congressional salaries have been frozen since 2009 while speaking to press on Wednesday. "When you adjust for inflation...Congress today is making 31% less than they made in that year. It goes down every year," he said.


quote:

"If you stay on this trajectory, you're going to have less qualified people who are willing to make the extreme sacrifice to run for Congress," Johnson warned. "At least let them, like, engage in some stock trading so that they can continue to take care of their family."

The practice of Congress members engaging in stock trading has come under a renewed scrutiny following Trump's announcement of sweeping tariffs placed on trade partners around the globe. Many of the tariffs have since been renegotiated, with the market reacting to news of administrative policy changes.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
66819 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:20 pm to
It isn't supposed to be a fricking career, Mike.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
43627 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:20 pm to
This fricking tool
Posted by DIGGY
Member since Nov 2012
1837 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:21 pm to
But yet their net worth increases each year. Funny how that is……
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
66819 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:21 pm to
You know what else will fix this issue, Mike?

Term limits.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
5241 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:22 pm to
Such a weird argument. Is he admitting that insider trading with impunity is a necessary perk of the job???
Posted by LSUnation78
Northshore
Member since Aug 2012
13506 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:22 pm to
Yo.


Wtf
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
9889 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:23 pm to
Let these corrupt politicians just invest in index and mutual funds and ban them from buying individual stocks.
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
8972 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:23 pm to
Sounds like something the Bee would put out there.
Posted by RelicBatches86
Florida
Member since Nov 2024
414 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:24 pm to
He's right though.

Businessman, successful investors, or whomever would be decent politicians are not going to get rid of their successful businesses because it would be a conflict of interest, they just wont run for office.
That goes for Executive branch and Congress...
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
66819 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

Businessman, successful investors, or whomever would be decent politicians are not going to get rid of their successful businesses because it would be a conflict of interest, they just wont run for office.
That goes for Executive branch and Congress...

Meh. We've strayed far from what our early leaders believed was duty to their nation by actual SERVICE to its people. Being a career politician shouldn't be a goal for anyone.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
75338 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:27 pm to
What a fricking a-hole! Real sacrifice. Sure.
Posted by CR4090
Member since Apr 2023
6752 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:27 pm to
Mike is a Mitch.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
40815 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:27 pm to
Congress pay is a lot more than the average American makes. If they need to do insider trading to take care of their families then what about the rest of us?
Posted by Arkaea79
Member since Sep 2022
394 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:29 pm to
Well I'd argue those positions were never intended to be financially beneficial.. in fact originally it often meant you lost wealth not gained it. Politician was never meant to be a career
This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 6:30 pm
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
13325 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:30 pm to
The ban on individual stocks or companies doesn’t have to include mutual funds or especially index funds. All that can be spelled out, but he knows this already. Those individual stocks is where they can use their insider knowledge to make the real money. Mutual funds are too slow for them.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
47333 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

Businessman, successful investors, or whomever would be decent politicians are not going to get rid of their successful businesses because it would be a conflict of interest, they just wont run for office.

True. Trump was an audacious exception, but not one in a thousand could pull that off.

Another thing about running for office is most businessmen would not do it because they would have embarrassing personal information dredged up. Almost everyone with spirit is going to have something in their past - DUIs, affairs, ugly divorce - that they don’t want publicized.
Posted by mikesliveisacheater
Member since Nov 2009
1095 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:31 pm to
And they still make over 4 times the average US income and get that salary every year for the rest of there lives as long as they finish 1 term.

Those poor public servants. If they can't insider trade then how will they make it on that amount and any bribes . . . I mean speaking fees that they get post office?
Posted by captron
Occupied Sillycon Valley
Member since Jul 2018
517 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

"If you stay on this trajectory, you're going to have less qualified people who are willing to make the extreme sacrifice to run for Congress



Less qualified ? These people and their "extreme sacrifice" have made every one of them rich and put the US in 36 trillion debt.

Extreme sacrifice ? This is delusion.
This post was edited on 5/14/25 at 6:34 pm
Posted by Great Plains Drifter
Flyover, U.S.A.
Member since Jul 2019
7421 posts
Posted on 5/14/25 at 6:33 pm to
Considering most all of em leave as multi-millionaires (regardless of how they came in), I’d say this little “perk”” more than helps “take care of the family” Mike.

And “qualified” Mike? You mean like NYC bartender type qualified?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram