Started By
Message

Vance says India-Pakistan conflict ‘none of our business’.

Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:23 pm
Posted by Golfer1865
Member since Apr 2025
170 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:23 pm
This guy gets it.



quote:

Vice President JD Vance suggested the U.S. will not intervene in the ongoing conflict between India and Pakistan, arguing the dust-up is "fundamentally none of our business."

"We can't control these countries," Vance told Fox News’ Martha McCallum on "The Story" Thursday. "We're not going to get involved in the middle of a war that's fundamentally none of our business and has nothing to do with America’s ability to control it."


Link to full story.

Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
46907 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Vance says India-Pakistan conflict ‘none of our business’.




Neither is Russia-Ukraine or Israel-Palestine.
Posted by Golfer1865
Member since Apr 2025
170 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Neither is Russia-Ukraine or Israel-Palestine.


Or Israel-Iran.
Posted by gothamdawg
NYC
Member since Nov 2015
1105 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:37 pm to
quote:


Neither is Russia-Ukraine or Israel-Palestine.


Bingo!
Nor Yemen for that matter
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
99845 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:53 pm to
Mostly agree. Although these are two nuclear powers, its in the world's interest to not let it escalate to that point. But our only role should be as a mediator. No more taxpayer funded war support packages.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
54545 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:54 pm to
Hopefully he can convince Agent Orange that Israel and Ukraine are none of our business, either.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
32870 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:55 pm to
The only involvement from the US I would be accepting of would be offering to mediate peace as a neutral third party at Camp David.
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
13140 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:56 pm to
That’s why I voted for Trump.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
21901 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

quote:

Vance says India-Pakistan conflict ‘none of our business’.





Neither is Russia-Ukraine or Israel-Palestine.
Well, to an extent.

With Israel-Palestine, we have always had a close relationship with Israel, and quite often the Palestinians fighting them would also be chanting "death to America" and burning our flag in the streets. And lots of times, it was Israel (a state) vs unhappy terrorists, not another country. So when things would kick off over there, we'd usually tend to support Israel, both as an ally and as an extension of ourselves vs these terrorists.

Russia-Ukraine, this is still Cold War based. Both countries were part of the USSR (which was clearly run by Russia, but Kyiv would be a big target in a conflict). At this point, we're sorta viewing this as Russians (former Soviets) vs Ukrainians (ex Soviets), so we're helping Ukraine to see how much trouble Russia has overcoming things. It's basically an alternate reality version of the battle we feared would happen between East and West Germany, with the benefits of
a) not having any troops in the fight, and
b) the territory being fought over isn't an ally in Western Europe.
The short answer to our interest, it lets us examine the Russian capabilities without having to fight them.

India-Pakistan is really a whole different animal. We're not historically tied to them (that would be more of a British thing), and we're not really threatened by either side (although most would agree the Pakistani's are the more dangerous side, being Muslim). Nobody is over there chanting "death to America", this is purely an internal conflict.
Posted by GeauxBurrow312
Member since Nov 2024
2235 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 12:58 pm to
Yemen is different than all of the other examples. Yemen attacked our ships that are in international waters, and was preventing freedom of navigation - that is a US problem

Iran, Ukraine, Hamas, India are all not our concerns. I think Iran only becomes a us problem if they go for a nuke
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
30931 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 1:04 pm to
Vance looks like he will be unanimous for the 48th
Posted by Figgy
CenCal
Member since May 2020
8972 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

Mostly agree. Although these are two nuclear powers, its in the world's interest to not let it escalate to that point. But our only role should be as a mediator



This here.
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
11582 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Vance looks like he will be unanimous for the 48th


At this point, I'm way more comfortable with him at the top than anyone else. He can engage in thoughtful conversations and give you his viewpoints in a clear manner.
Posted by Bigdawgb
Member since Oct 2023
2508 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

He can engage in thoughtful conversations and give you his viewpoints in a clear manner.


At this point I think the only way he loses would be a bunch of other reasonable & well spoken politicians emerging as competition. Which would be the best thing to happen to American politics in decades.

People are tired of word salads and -ist this -ism that
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
26184 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 1:55 pm to
Vance is flat wrong. It’s everyone’s business. We have way too many ties to India for it to be none of our business.

He should have said that it isn’t anything we will get involved in from a military standpoint, but we are willing to assist in negotiating a reduction in hostilities.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
17735 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 1:56 pm to
Damn. That dude is one of the most confident and concise public speakers I've heard in a long time. No politicking or dancing around the issue. Just a good straight answer. I look forward to voting for him in 2028.
Posted by gothamdawg
NYC
Member since Nov 2015
1105 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

With Israel-Palestine, we have always had a close relationship with Israel, and quite often the Palestinians fighting them would also be chanting "death to America" and burning our flag in the streets


Not sure why they do that when we militarily and financially prop up their arch enemy lol

Without our support, Israel would not be capable of doing half the stuff they do.
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
39705 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 1:59 pm to
I agree w/ him here
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
21901 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

quote:

With Israel-Palestine, we have always had a close relationship with Israel, and quite often the Palestinians fighting them would also be chanting "death to America" and burning our flag in the streets



Not sure why they do that when we militarily and financially prop up their arch enemy lol

Without our support, Israel would not be capable of doing half the stuff they do.
Ok, so let's go there...

how many of these little countries that oppress their people had Soviet aide, using AKs, Soviet (Russian) tanks, etc? I never seem to have seen anyone burning the Soviet flags in the street constantly when shite would pop off.

But with anything radical Islam, the US would be listed as public enemy #1, or 1A at lowest.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
5266 posts
Posted on 5/9/25 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Hopefully he can convince Agent Orange that Israel and Ukraine are none of our business, either.


He had those thrown in his lap by your President Vegetable.

Tell us how you picture Joe Biden interacting with world leaders at any time in his regime.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram