- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Well-balanced LSU team (pitching + offense + defense)
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:05 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:05 am
Through 21 league games, LSU is one of only 2 SEC teams in the Top3 in both ERA (pitching) and BA (offense) in conference play. LSU is #2 in ERA and #3 in BA. Arkansas is #3 in ERA and #1 in BA. Both LSU and Arkansas also rank Top3 in fielding %
SEC rank:
LSU: #2 ERA, #3 BA, #2 fielding%
Arkansas: #3 ERA, #1 BA, #3 fielding
Texas: #1 ERA, #9 BA, #1 fielding
Tennessee: #5 ERA, #6 BA, #14 fielding
Georgia:# 11 ERA, #12 BA, #3 fielding
Vandy: #4 ERA, #14 BA, #6 fielding
Auburn: #10 ERA, #8 BA, #6 fielding
A&M: #9 ERA, #15 BA, #12 fielding
Bama: #7 ERA, #12 BA, #10 fielding
OleMiss: #12 ERA, #3 BA, #11 fielding
Oklahoma: #6 ERA, #5 BA, #14 fielding
Florida: #14 ERA, #6 BA, #5 fielding
Kentucky: #8 ERA, #11 BA, #6 fielding
MissSt: #13 ERA, #2 BA, #16 fielding
South Carolina: #15 ERA, #9 BA, #9 fielding
Missouri: #16 ERA, #16 BA, #13 fielding
LINK: Conference stats
In other words, this is a pretty well-rounded LSU team that can beat you with pitching and/or offense depending on the day.
LSU, along with Arkansas, Tennessee, and Oklahoma seem to be the most “balanced” teams in the league when looking at ERA and BA.
Missouri is perfectly balanced, in a bad way… last in both ERA and batting average.
SEC rank:
LSU: #2 ERA, #3 BA, #2 fielding%
Arkansas: #3 ERA, #1 BA, #3 fielding
Texas: #1 ERA, #9 BA, #1 fielding
Tennessee: #5 ERA, #6 BA, #14 fielding
Georgia:# 11 ERA, #12 BA, #3 fielding
Vandy: #4 ERA, #14 BA, #6 fielding
Auburn: #10 ERA, #8 BA, #6 fielding
A&M: #9 ERA, #15 BA, #12 fielding
Bama: #7 ERA, #12 BA, #10 fielding
OleMiss: #12 ERA, #3 BA, #11 fielding
Oklahoma: #6 ERA, #5 BA, #14 fielding
Florida: #14 ERA, #6 BA, #5 fielding
Kentucky: #8 ERA, #11 BA, #6 fielding
MissSt: #13 ERA, #2 BA, #16 fielding
South Carolina: #15 ERA, #9 BA, #9 fielding
Missouri: #16 ERA, #16 BA, #13 fielding
LINK: Conference stats
In other words, this is a pretty well-rounded LSU team that can beat you with pitching and/or offense depending on the day.
LSU, along with Arkansas, Tennessee, and Oklahoma seem to be the most “balanced” teams in the league when looking at ERA and BA.
Missouri is perfectly balanced, in a bad way… last in both ERA and batting average.
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:10 am to JPLSU1981
I was told this team sucks and won’t make it to Omaha last Tuesday
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:11 am to JPLSU1981
Is Nate Yeskie gonna have to smack a bitch to get some respect around here?


Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:15 am to JPLSU1981
And yet there are fans who think Yeskie is a terrible coach
OP, would you mind adding where we rank in OPS?

OP, would you mind adding where we rank in OPS?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:16 am to JPLSU1981
We're a very good team. We have deficiencies in certain areas, but Jay has learned as the season has gone along and is managing everything quite well right now
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:23 am to JPLSU1981
Looking at it this way is a little too static. For instance, Arkansas has far and away the #1 offense i nthe conference hitting .311 and scoring 9.3 runs per game. #2 and #3 are nowhere close to that.
Meanwhile Texas looks "down" at just #9 in BA, but it's .261 which is really not far off us at .274 in conference play at #3. So things like that are a bit misleading. They are at 6.2 runs per game, we are at 6.5, basically no difference at all.
Texas is WAY ahead of everyone on the pitching side with an ERA south of 3.2 at #1 and also lead the conference in fielding at .987
There's a reason they are 20-3 (19-3 without the OM non-conf game) in SEC opponents
Meanwhile Texas looks "down" at just #9 in BA, but it's .261 which is really not far off us at .274 in conference play at #3. So things like that are a bit misleading. They are at 6.2 runs per game, we are at 6.5, basically no difference at all.
Texas is WAY ahead of everyone on the pitching side with an ERA south of 3.2 at #1 and also lead the conference in fielding at .987
There's a reason they are 20-3 (19-3 without the OM non-conf game) in SEC opponents
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:24 am to JPLSU1981
Only 32 errors as well. 5th best in the SEC
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:30 am to JPLSU1981
if we can:
-shore up some relief pitching
-not slump all at the same time
SHIP on the way!
-shore up some relief pitching
-not slump all at the same time
SHIP on the way!
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:49 am to unctiger4
For how much hate Yeskie gets on this board, you'd think our record is sub .500
It's almost like our fans don't realize how good our staff is relative to the rest of the country

It's almost like our fans don't realize how good our staff is relative to the rest of the country
Posted on 5/2/25 at 10:58 am to topherbrown21
quote:
For how much hate Yeskie gets on this board, you'd think our record is sub .500
I think what some like to point out here is our good ERA is focused in on 4 guys who are used by far the most in conference play. So we basically have 4 very good arms, then a gigantic dropoff into a bunch of guys who havent been able to rely on in conference play at all. We've certainly gotten away with to this point, but does that mean Yeskie is doing a great coaching job having only 4 out of 20ish pitchers who we feel comfortable throwing in SEC games? What happens if 1 of those 4 guys got hurt?
I'm not trying to bash Yeskie, just making the argument which seems pretty logical to me. Obviously we're not going to have 10-12 guys ready to be Good SEC pitchers, but the question is are we ok with only 4 so far this season 2/3s of the way through conference play? I dont think its unfair to expect to have a few more than 4 guys we can count on in SEC games out of a pool of 20 or so guys.
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 11:00 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:03 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
I think what some like to point out here is our good ERA is focused in on 4 guys who are used by far the most in conference play. So we basically have 4 very good arms, then a gigantic dropoff into a bunch of guys who havent been able to rely on in conference play at all.
This is similar to most every team in college baseball.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:08 am to thunderbird1100
Having 4 guys that you feel like can walk out onto the mound and command the game is more than most. I think it’s important not to take for granted how rare that is in modern college baseball
It’s also important not to compare it to our roster or even other teams rosters in the past, and rather compare it to the current landscape of college baseball
I’m not sure that you can find a question mark on this team that every other team is not questioning at this point also
It’s also important not to compare it to our roster or even other teams rosters in the past, and rather compare it to the current landscape of college baseball
I’m not sure that you can find a question mark on this team that every other team is not questioning at this point also
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:09 am to thunderbird1100
I agree about the 4 arms, but the bullpen issue is an inability to throw strikes. People can blame Yeski, but dang, throw strikes. And I am not talking about nibbling corners and not getting calls. I am talking about balls hitting the back stop, hitting batters, etc. How do you get this far in your baseball carreer, and you cannot throw strikes?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:09 am to vidtiger23
quote:
This is similar to most every team in college baseball.
We shouldnt be comapred to an average team in college baseball. We should be compared against the best teams in college baseball.
Texas certainly has more than 4 arms they count on in SEC play.
Tennessee also has more than 4 arms they count on in SEC play.
Etc...
In the past our own teams certainly had more than 4 guys we felt confident in putting on the mound in SEC games. I realize this year the eRa is looking very good, thats besides the point. The question is our pitching coach doing a good job having just 4/20 guys ready to go each weekend when it rolls around we feel good about. We know those 4 guys are doing a great job, does that mean the coach is doing a great job? When almost every other pitcher basically struggles with command fairly consistently, that's a problem. It's not like all the other guys are throwing strikes and just getting hit hard, that's only Shores basically, everyone else just keeps hitting batters, throwing wild pitches and walking guys at very high rates.
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 11:15 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:27 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Tennessee also has more than 4 arms they count on in SEC play.
Do they really? If they do, it's not by much.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:37 am to JPLSU1981
I think the thing I'm happiest about is how much better we are at defense compared to the last couple of years.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:40 am to saint tiger225
quote:
Is Nate Yeskie gonna have to smack a bitch to get some respect around here?
I think Yeskie gets a little too much hate around here. LSU fans want to have 10 pitchers that range from Skenes to Herring in ability. It's unrealistic.
But I would like to know if Yeskie calls outside pitches when we shift just to frick with the other coaches. Or if we are shifting while he's calling outside pitches just to mess with him. Or option 3, they do it together to mess with the fans.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:42 am to topherbrown21
quote:
It's almost like our fans don't realize how good our staff is relative to the rest of the country
That’s because 95% of LSU baseball fans ONLY watch LSU baseball
They have no perspective of the national landscape - just about every team is struggling with something
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:43 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
4 guys who are used by far the most in conference play. So we basically have 4 very good arms, then a gigantic dropoff into a bunch of guys who havent been able to rely on in conference play at all.
Just curious, how many ‘studs’ do you think other teams have?
quote:
Texas certainly has more than 4 arms they count on in SEC play.
Tennessee also has more than 4 arms they count on in SEC play. Etc...
Okay?! Who are they and what are their stats?
Orrr were you just talking out of your arse?
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 11:46 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 11:43 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Tennessee also has more than 4 arms they count on in SEC play.
No, they don’t.
quote:
In the past our own teams certainly had more than 4 guys we felt confident in putting on the mound in SEC games.
This is simply not true. Even in 2023, there were ZERO bullpen guys that were pitching well during the regular season. Those guys didn’t step up until the post season.
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 11:45 am
Popular
Back to top
