- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judicial Jurisprudence killing Trump EO’s.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:29 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:29 am
What’s the solution here?
They should have known the miscreants from the left would break every rule in the book to thwart non-communist/progressive/globalist agenda right?
Is there a contingency plan to execute that’s on hold for some unknown reason?
If great POTUS would just have his EO’s rubber stamped by the 5th circuit court before issuance it would stop all this jurisprudence.
My o2c
They should have known the miscreants from the left would break every rule in the book to thwart non-communist/progressive/globalist agenda right?
Is there a contingency plan to execute that’s on hold for some unknown reason?
If great POTUS would just have his EO’s rubber stamped by the 5th circuit court before issuance it would stop all this jurisprudence.
My o2c
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 6:45 am
7
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:36 am to BarberitosDawg
Once SCOTUS rules on a couple cases, the rest of the cases will dissappear. If SCOTUS doesn't rule correctly, Trump admin should simply ignore them.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:46 am to lake chuck fan
EO are no way to run a Presidency.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:49 am to hansenthered1
quote:
EO are no way to run a Presidency.
What is your Congress doing?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:49 am to hansenthered1
quote:
EO are no way to run a Presidency
But if you are going to sign one, you should be required to do it like Trump does with a public press conference and taking any and all questions from the press about it.
Love or hate Trump, it’s one of the most admirable things we’ve ever seen a president do.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:49 am to hansenthered1
quote:
EO are no way to run a Presidency.
He’s keeping campaign promises.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:51 am to hansenthered1
quote:
EO are no way to run a Presidency.
That is correct. However, it takes executive orders to stop Executive orders, and to eliminate the waste fraud and abuse rampant in our government, which is encouraged by the bureaucratic state. When laws aren’t applied to crimes, then an executive order is the only way to effectively stop it.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 6:59 am to BarberitosDawg
I think better written EO would be a great start.
Like his first term....rushing in with poorly written orders derailed a lot of what he was trying.
I used the AEA as an example. He simply did not use the correct wording. We all agree that he is doing the right thing but the method and use of words is very important. It could be that the lawyers doing this are doing it on purpose or just not competent enough. Dont know that answer
Like his first term....rushing in with poorly written orders derailed a lot of what he was trying.
I used the AEA as an example. He simply did not use the correct wording. We all agree that he is doing the right thing but the method and use of words is very important. It could be that the lawyers doing this are doing it on purpose or just not competent enough. Dont know that answer
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:02 am to MajorityWhip
quote:
What is your Congress doing?
Zip, zilch, sweet frickall. Some of them are doing so little that they just sit on the steps and weep OMB all night long.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:06 am to hansenthered1
I know, they should be run by groups that are less than .01% of the population
and want free shite
and want free shite
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:21 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
If SCOTUS doesn't rule correctly, Trump admin should simply ignore them.
Need we ask your interpretation of rule correctly”?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:23 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
If SCOTUS doesn't rule correctly, Trump admin should simply ignore them
What are the rest of us supposed to think when you say shite like this?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:24 am to southernboisb
quote:You shouldn't. "Rule Correctly" should always mean "in the best interest of American Citizens"...
Need we ask your interpretation of rule correctly”?
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:24 am to BarberitosDawg
but the EOs are illegal because a judge says they are illegal and that proves it*
*but not when the parties are switched
*but not when the parties are switched
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:25 am to boosiebadazz
One of my favorite things about this board (to be fair, this probably applies to both ends of the political spectrum) is whenever any decision goes against the God Emperor, that judge is "activist" and "doesn't follow the Constitution." 
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 7:36 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:30 am to MajorityWhip
quote:
What is your Congress doing?
Waiting on Trump's big, beautiful bill.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:31 am to dafif
quote:
It could be that the lawyers doing this are doing it on purpose or just not competent enough. Dont know that answer
Stephen Miller thinks that if he talks shite on TV it makes up for his constant frickups in implementing policy.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:37 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
Once SCOTUS rules on a couple cases, the rest of the cases will dissappear
Bullllllshit! They will continue to print their dissections out as fast as they can.
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:38 am to SlowFlowPro
So that’s what he thinks. Now you’re wearing your psychology hat?
This post was edited on 5/2/25 at 7:44 am
Posted on 5/2/25 at 7:43 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
If SCOTUS doesn't rule correctly, Trump admin should simply ignore them.
Or dissolve SCOTUS as Jesse Kelly explains here:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News