- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
State pauses work on Louisiana's biggest-ever coastal project. 'You just can't afford it.'
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:58 am
Posted on 4/6/25 at 9:58 am
quote:
Gov. Jeff Landry's administration has ordered a 90-day pause on work on Louisiana's biggest-ever coastal project, the controversial Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion, arguing the state cannot afford the more than $3 billion plan and stressing that it must be smaller in scale.
The decision, confirmed by the state's coastal officials, took effect Friday. It halts nearly all work related to the project, which has been planned and studied for years and broke ground in August 2023 on the west bank of Plaquemines Parish near Ironton. Funds related to the 2010 BP oil spill are intended to pay for it, but state coastal officials say rising costs mean Louisiana could be on the hook for hundreds of millions of dollars, if not more.
While not officially killing the project, the pause moves what many once considered the linchpin of the state's coastal restoration plans further out of reach. Only initial work had been allowed to continue in recent months at the site as the state negotiated with Plaquemines Parish over its future.
State coastal officials say they are now developing ideas for a smaller diversion and want to move forward with construction of a large-scale land bridge in Barataria Basin using dredged sediment to build it.
Prominent coastal advocacy groups expressed dismay over the move and urged the state to reconsider. They note that marsh-building projects using dredged sediment eventually erode just like the rest of the coast, whereas the Mid-Barataria project mimics the way south Louisiana was built in the first place.
quote:
A smaller diversion would cause far less harm to commercial shrimping and oyster growing in the area, one of the main criticisms of the Mid-Barataria project. Under the previous plan, shrimpers and oyster growers in the diversion area would have to move farther out or find another line of work. Nearly $380 million had been set aside to help those affected by the project, including commercial fishers and buyouts for homeowners.
Dove says the $380 million will not be nearly enough compensation and is worried about the prospects of lawsuits. Contractors could, however, also sue over the lost work if the project is canceled, and it is unclear whether the roughly $500 million already spent can be recouped.
quote:
Coastal advocates say it matches the scale of Louisiana's land-loss crisis, with the state having lost some 2,000 square miles over the last century. Sea level rise is projected to worsen the problem in the decades ahead.
quote:
Kim Reyher, executive director of the Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana, said the organization was "disappointed by this development, but the river can still do what it’s always done: build and sustain land and life in our wetlands."
"We call on our leaders to focus on acting with urgency and using Deepwater Horizon settlement funds for projects vetted through our Master Plan," she said.
quote:
Some $2.92 billion in BP funding has been approved for the project, but Landry has said the cost has now risen to at least $3.1 billion.
quote:
Landry shifted the state's position on the project after taking office in 2024. He abandoned the state's previous legal position that it did not need a permit from Plaquemines Parish, which firmly opposes the project and has filed suit to stop it.
An agreement with the parish had allowed limited work to move forward. Work done includes site clearing, utility relocations, drainage improvements and access dredging. The 90-day pause will now see equipment moved off the site, which Dove says will save money.
Using the BP funds for a different project would likely trigger the need for approvals and scientific analysis that may take several years.
LINK
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:01 am to ragincajun03
*current affair noise*
On today’s episode of “Louisiana gonna Louisiana…”
On today’s episode of “Louisiana gonna Louisiana…”
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:02 am to ragincajun03
Not taking Landry’s side, but this project doesn’t create but a small amount of land and it’ll take 50 years to do it. IDK what the answer is though
This post was edited on 4/6/25 at 10:03 am
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:30 am to Boston911
quote:
Not taking Landry’s side, but this project doesn’t create but a small amount of land and it’ll take 50 years to do it. IDK what the answer is though
50 years is a long time to wait.
I think a smaller freshwater introduction system would be better along with sediment pipelines would help.
Also, Gordy loves rocks. Without rocks there is nothing to secure the newly created land.
If you look at western Terrebonne, there are tons canals but has a huge influence of freshwater from the Atchafalaya. Compared to eastern Terrebonne and Lafourche that are washing away without freshwater and sediment. Also look at the alignment of the Morganza to the Gulf, that levee is doing much to rebuild the coastal marshes inside the system. It is allowing more of a brackish estuary environment that allows the marsh grass to thrive.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:34 am to ragincajun03
I’m sick of hearing about the commercial fisherman and oyster man as an excuse not to do diversion projects to rebuild the coast.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:54 am to ragincajun03
I would rather him be honest and just straight up say, the state doesn’t have the money for that than tell every one a bunch of BS
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:57 am to Boston911
quote:
it’ll take 50 years to do it.
Exactly... it takes a long time to build up land. These projects were never intended to reach completion in our lifetimes. This is about future generations, not ours.
Unfortunately, that's how opponents of the projects justify canceling/delaying/stealing from them. Their line of thinking is... if it doesn't benefit me in my lifetime... screw it... it doesn't matter to me.
In this state... the tail wags the dog. We let short-term thinkers and local interests handicap any big-picture strategy for Louisiana. I'm hardly surprised by this latest development in a long, long, tradition of South Louisiana bullshite.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 10:59 am to ragincajun03
At least there’s tailgating and gumbo
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:00 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Contractors could, however, also sue over the lost work if the project is canceled, and it is unclear whether the roughly $500 million already spent can be recouped.
So all total, after the contractors sue, the state will have spend close to a billion dollars and have nothing to show for it.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:02 am to ragincajun03
They'll probably end up spending $3-4 billion on a downsized project that will will be gone in 20 years.
And that's not counting the $500mm already spent and the settlements with the contractors already on contract.
Last, a lot of the funds have to be dispersed from federally controlled funds and they might tell LA "No" after cancelling the diversion.
And that's not counting the $500mm already spent and the settlements with the contractors already on contract.
Last, a lot of the funds have to be dispersed from federally controlled funds and they might tell LA "No" after cancelling the diversion.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:03 am to ragincajun03
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:10 am to Fat and Happy
quote:
would rather him be honest and just straight up say, the state doesn’t have the money for that than tell every one a bunch of BS
Saying that the state doesn't have the money is a lie. Between federal funding (already earmarked for the project), and dedicated coastal funds, the diversion was already funded.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:11 am to ragincajun03
Anyone feel free to correct me if I am wrong on this added context:
Billy Nunguesser has been adamantly opposed to this project. Billy Nunguesser chose not to run for governor but was apocalyptic after the LA GOP made an extremely early endorsement of Landry.
Billy Nunguesser has been adamantly opposed to this project. Billy Nunguesser chose not to run for governor but was apocalyptic after the LA GOP made an extremely early endorsement of Landry.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:16 am to rmc
Billy is a shite stain on the state.
The sooner he’s gone from LA the better.
The sooner he’s gone from LA the better.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:24 am to ragincajun03
Louisiana is such a cool place to be from.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:40 am to NIH
quote:
At least there’s tailgating and gumbo
And Omar!
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:41 am to rmc
You are not wrong, Good Sir/Ma’am.
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:42 am to ragincajun03
What about the billion dollars that just came in from chevron?
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:43 am to Boston911
quote:Maybe opening the levee back up in places where annual floods used to add sediment to coast?
IDK what the answer is though
Posted on 4/6/25 at 11:43 am to Boston911
quote:It took nearly 100 years to get to this point.
Not taking Landry’s side, but this project doesn’t create but a small amount of land and it’ll take 50 years to do
Popular
Back to top
