- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did Cheif Justice Roberts just wade into the waters on Boasberg?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:44 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:44 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts just fired back at Trump after Trump called for the impeachment of Judge Boasberg (who tried to require Trump to keep illegal gang members in the U.S.).
"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."
Source: POLITICO
52
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:45 am to BCreed1
This little midget enjoyed his time on Epstein Island fr fr
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:45 am to BCreed1
Of course. The COI for these judges needs to be addressed.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:46 am to BCreed1
Good.
Someone needs to flush him out into the open.
Someone needs to flush him out into the open.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:47 am to BCreed1
My favorite part of Robert’s tweet “Of course, if Mr Trump will see to continue sitting on the Epstein client list, I may reconsider my position”
Fascinating
Fascinating
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:47 am to BCreed1
quote:
For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.
For more than two centuries judges hadn’t lost their freaking minds.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:47 am to BCreed1
Time for the GOP to revive LOCK EM UP chants
Judicial coup
Judicial coup
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:52 am to BCreed1
I support the role of the Article III branch.
It's important to have a referee call balls and strikes in disputes.
Unlike some of my fellow members of the bar I also think it's important that the judiciary stay in its lane or else it risks losing credibility with the people in which case it would become useless.
It's important to have a referee call balls and strikes in disputes.
Unlike some of my fellow members of the bar I also think it's important that the judiciary stay in its lane or else it risks losing credibility with the people in which case it would become useless.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:55 am to BCreed1
Trump post:
“This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President - He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES,” Trump posted on Truth Social. “This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!”
And this boys and girls is why we have separation of powers and checks and balances. When 1 branch becomes unhinged, you need the others to check it.
“This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President - He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES,” Trump posted on Truth Social. “This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!”
And this boys and girls is why we have separation of powers and checks and balances. When 1 branch becomes unhinged, you need the others to check it.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:55 am to BCreed1
quote:
For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."
He'd be right if this were about a simple disagreement , but, it's not. Should have kept his mouth shut and let the opinions he has be issued from the bench with some fricking legal, constitutional basis.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:55 am to BCreed1
Apparently JR doesn't think the Executive has a right to an opinion. And he also apparently thinks it's ok for a low level judge to run the Executive. Interesting...
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:55 am to BCreed1
Did that pos ever rebuke Black Jesus or Xiden? What about Schumer? I think not.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:56 am to BCreed1
quote:
For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."
Well John, maybe you should get your branch of government in order or shut the frick up. Can’t take the heat then get up out the kitchen.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:56 am to TrueTiger
There are glaring conflict of interest issues with this judge in this case. Not to mention he could be shown to have personal bias against Trump. and should recuse.
Grounds for impeachment in my opinion.
Grounds for impeachment in my opinion.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:56 am to Boss
quote:
1 branch becomes unhinged, you need the others to check it.
So, you are saying the judicial branch needs to be reeled back in?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:57 am to TrueTiger
The CHIEF JUSTICE is ignoring history. As of September 2017, 15 federal judges have been impeached, and only eight have been convicted. Three others resigned before completion of impeachment proceedings.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:57 am to BCreed1
I don’t see where Trump! started any impeachment proceedings.
Some rando congressman, maybe, but it appears CJR aim is misguided.
Some rando congressman, maybe, but it appears CJR aim is misguided.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:57 am to TrueTiger
The appeal process is used to further judicial disagreements
The impeachment is process is for outright use of the judicial branch to further a political agenda and abuse of power
The impeachment is process is for outright use of the judicial branch to further a political agenda and abuse of power
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:57 am to BCreed1
Thank you, Justice Robert's. Now do Democrat Court Packing threats and Ethics intimidation of Alito and Thomas. Ya prick.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:58 am to The Maj
Executive branch does not have carte blanche because they won an election.
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News