Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Barrett cuck again and side with Liberals

The article states the ruling involved "already completed work."

Why would we be for that?

I am against any more funding for all this overseas BS. CUT, CUT, CUT!!!

But, if work has been completed satisfactorily, what legal, moral and ethical reason exists to withhold payment?

It’s completed work. It should be paid

It's hilarious at how Roberts is sooooooooooo sensitive to the reputation of the courts (and Court), and tries like Hell to keep decisions from being too far-reaching (see Sebelius and Dobbs), yet he basically allows a district court judge to have the equivalent power of the President of the United States.

if it's work that's already been completed, it should be paid, no issues with them ruling this way

like it or not, it would be stupid of anyone to not pay for work that's already been completed, even if we don't agree with the justification of the work itself.

you're contracted to do a job, you do the job, and you expect to get paid for it.

now, we can cut off the spigot for these future jobs.

Let’s reconvene this meeting after we verify the “work”, and that it was done.

ACB was a absolutely terrible choice she is basically a dem

She is pure evil

quote:

---

Let’s reconvene this meeting after we verify the “work”, and that it was done.

---

that's fine and should be done for every job out there

but if it's work completed and you don't pay, then that sets a pretty bad precedent and not a great way to do business.

Agree.

"This decision only affects completed work, not future freezes.

The ruling compels the Government to release funds for work that had already been completed before February 13, 2025. However, it does not block the administration from continuing to pause or cut future foreign assistance. Trump’s broader agenda of cutting USAID funding may continue for projects that were not yet underway."