- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Want to hit Net Zero? Easy - just release WOLVES, say experts
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:31 am
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:31 am

Want to hit Net Zero? Easy - just release WOLVES, say experts
Releasing wolves into the wild in the Scottish Highlands could help alleviate the climate crisis and reach Net Zero, experts say.
A reintroduction of the animals could help stimulate the growth of native woodland by hunting red deer, which consume tree saplings and bark from older trees.
Researchers from the University of Leeds estimate that each wolf released could lead to an annual carbon uptake capability of 6080 tonnes of CO2, making each of the predators 'worth' £154,000, using currently accepted valuations of carbon.
The study showed that a total population of 167 wolves across Cairngorms, South-west Highlands, Central Highlands and North-west Highlands would be enough to reduce red deer populations to allow trees to regenerate naturally.
The increased coverage of woodland would take up one million tonnes of CO2 each year.
This is approximately five per cent of the carbon removal target for UK woodlands that would be necessary for the UK to reach Net Zero by 2050, according to the Climate Change Committee.
LINK
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:34 am to djmed
Every day, the climate scam seems to reach new levels of absurdity.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:37 am to djmed
I find those numbers incredibly over sold.
So trees are great for the environment. Who knew.
So trees are great for the environment. Who knew.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:37 am to djmed
If they do.
Stay off the moors and stick to the roads.

Stay off the moors and stick to the roads.

Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:38 am to djmed
Sounds like a good new show for Troy Landry...is there a red deer hunting season?
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:38 am to djmed
They would just go around eating farmer’s livestock and then the farmer’s would be thrown in jail for killing the wolves without government permission.
Like the days of the Royal hunting privilege.
Like the days of the Royal hunting privilege.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:40 am to djmed
Wait there are so many deer that they are eating every tree?
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:41 am to OldNo.7
Climate change is probable real... The solutions given are about power and money, not about truly changing anything.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:45 am to goatmilker
quote:
So trees are great for the environment.
The original renewable resource.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:47 am to allin2010
quote:
Climate change is probable real.
Of course it is. The Earth’s climate has never not been changing. Do these fools expect the climate to remain static in its current state? There isn’t a damn thing humans can do to prevent climate change.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:47 am to djmed
This was already done in the U.S. a long time ago. It was at Yellowstone Park. Wolves will not overeat the deer because the deer learn to eat in wide swathes of territory instead of staying close as an obvious target. This solves the tree damage because the harm is when all the deer are eating the same acreage.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:48 am to _Hurricane_
quote:Yep, those Scots are known for sheep shagging. I bet they are all for reintroducing a predator that could take out their girlfriend.
They would just go around eating farmer’s livestock and then the farmer’s would be thrown in jail for killing the wolves without government permission.
Like the days of the Royal hunting privilege.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:51 am to djmed
Here's my take:
These scientists or grants they received are tied to wolves, the study of wolves, etc.
So, more wolves=more study=more money.
I do not know.
These scientists or grants they received are tied to wolves, the study of wolves, etc.
So, more wolves=more study=more money.
I do not know.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:54 am to djmed
You know what else can hunt deer and start yesterday?
Humans.
Humans.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:54 am to djmed
I seen that movie. It was in Yorkshire but this is exactly what the lycans want!


Posted on 2/17/25 at 10:56 am to djmed

Or just turn loose about 25 baws in some Kuiu and the problem is solved in few weeks. Of course we'll need to be alllowed to shoot guns and drive 2500 pickups, not some eurotrash cars.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:00 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
Every day, the climate scam seems to reach new levels of absurdity.
Yep.
quote:
Researchers from the University of Leeds estimate that each wolf released could lead to an annual carbon uptake capability of 6080 tonnes of CO2, making each of the predators 'worth' £154,000, using currently accepted valuations of carbon.
Posted on 2/17/25 at 11:18 am to Zach
So you exemplify utter idiocy with that line of bullshite. There was no tree problem in Yellowstone moron. Wolves have decimated the elk and moose populations. Mule deer do not damage trees. You read a book by some leftist moron and believed it hook line and sinker. It is hard to imagine such utter stupidity. But then your avatar picture aptly sums up your lack of intelligence.
Popular
Back to top
