- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

POLITICO has never been a beneficiary of government programs or subsidies—not one cent
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:44 am
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:44 am
President Trump on Thursday suggested the federal government was “paying off” media outlets to write positively about Democrats
A number of federal agencies allow some employees to expense subscriptions to newspapers, wire services and other media outlets so that they have information they need in many cases to do their jobs.
Some publications, such as Politico Pro, Punchbowl and other niche publications offer pricier subscriptions that cater to certain coverage areas, and provide detailed reporting of policy matters in Washington, D.C., that are meant for a more specialized audience of lobbyists and lawyers and others in the federal government.
Some government officials also are allowed to pay for these subscriptions to keep up with coverage.
The president named political publication Politico as a “left wing rag” that had “received” more than $8 million from the federal government
Musk and others noted that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and other government agencies and its employees had paid millions in monthly subscriptions to Politico Pro and other news services.
In a memo sent to employees, obtained by The Hill on Thursday, Politico CEO Goli Sheikholeslami and Editor in Chief John Harris said the discussion Musk had sparked was “a fine conversation to have, and we welcome it.”
“POLITICO has never been a beneficiary of government programs or subsidies—not one cent, ever, in 18 years,” the outlet’s leadership said. “The value of this journalism is clear, as evidenced by our subscription re-enlistment rates.”
LINK
A number of federal agencies allow some employees to expense subscriptions to newspapers, wire services and other media outlets so that they have information they need in many cases to do their jobs.
Some publications, such as Politico Pro, Punchbowl and other niche publications offer pricier subscriptions that cater to certain coverage areas, and provide detailed reporting of policy matters in Washington, D.C., that are meant for a more specialized audience of lobbyists and lawyers and others in the federal government.
Some government officials also are allowed to pay for these subscriptions to keep up with coverage.
The president named political publication Politico as a “left wing rag” that had “received” more than $8 million from the federal government
Musk and others noted that the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and other government agencies and its employees had paid millions in monthly subscriptions to Politico Pro and other news services.
In a memo sent to employees, obtained by The Hill on Thursday, Politico CEO Goli Sheikholeslami and Editor in Chief John Harris said the discussion Musk had sparked was “a fine conversation to have, and we welcome it.”
“POLITICO has never been a beneficiary of government programs or subsidies—not one cent, ever, in 18 years,” the outlet’s leadership said. “The value of this journalism is clear, as evidenced by our subscription re-enlistment rates.”
LINK
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:45 am to Jbird
The Hill knows that it’s next up to the plate.
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 9:47 am
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:46 am to MMauler
quote:
The Hill know that it’s next up to the plate.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:46 am to Jbird
Ok, let’s see how long they last.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:46 am to Jbird
quote:
“POLITICO has never been a beneficiary of government programs or subsidies—not one cent, ever, in 18 years,” the outlet’s leadership said. “The value of this journalism is clear, as evidenced by our subscription re-enlistment rates.
then why is their EIN number in the findings of gross reciepts?
If they are not getting monies, then who is?
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:46 am to Jbird
There is always a way to lie about anything
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:46 am to Jbird
Methinks they protest too much.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:46 am to Jbird
The grift is up. Nobody believes you, you fricking criminals
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:47 am to 10thyrsr
quote:
What about NGO subsidies?
Clinton (Bill) level parsing all around these days...
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:47 am to Jbird
I suppose Politico‘s quashing all of the well-sourced stories about the corrupt Biden family and Crackhead Hunter’s laptop was all just a coincidence.
Turned in by your own journalists....
Turned in by your own journalists....
This post was edited on 2/6/25 at 9:50 am
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:48 am to Jbird
Pretty easy to have a high re-subscription rate when the taxpayer picks up the tab.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:49 am to Jbird
Sure, sure.
And purchasing bullshite "pro" subscriptions for millions of dollars is completely normal.
This is just an end around.
And purchasing bullshite "pro" subscriptions for millions of dollars is completely normal.
This is just an end around.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:49 am to ApexTiger
quote:
then why is their EIN number in the findings of gross reciepts?
If they are not getting monies, then who is?
The rest of the post pretty much explained it all.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:50 am to Jbird
Then politico should have no problem making payroll without massive layoffs and restructuring if true.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:52 am to 10thyrsr
Politico is not saying no money from NGO which get the money from USAID. Politico is saying the money they got was from a service they provide (fee) not free tax payer dollars to write certain types of articles.
What it boils down to is do you believe this was some hunter biden paintings type of crap or was it legit business.
What it boils down to is do you believe this was some hunter biden paintings type of crap or was it legit business.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:52 am to Jbird
quote:
never been a beneficiary of government programs or subsidies
Hiding behind words. They were subscriptions and contracts. NOT "programs" or "subsidies".
This is how you Dem them.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:53 am to Jbird
quote:
POLITICO has never been a beneficiary of government programs or subsidies—
Lawyer talk.
Didn't say anything about grants or contracts.
Posted on 2/6/25 at 9:55 am to Jbird
This is akin to:
There were no FBI employees in the J6 crowd.
There were no FBI employees in the J6 crowd.
Popular
Back to top

40













