- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Google claims its new quantum chip has accessed parallel universes
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:03 pm
quote:LINK
Google on Monday announced Willow, its latest, greatest quantum computing chip. The speed and reliability performance claims Google’s made about this chip were newsworthy in themselves, but what really caught the tech industry’s attention was an even wilder claim tucked into the blog post about the chip.
Google Quantum AI founder Hartmut Neven wrote in his blog post that this chip was so mind-boggling fast that it must have borrowed computational power from other universes.
Ergo the chip’s performance indicates that parallel universes exist and “we live in a multiverse.”
Here’s the passage:
Willow’s performance on this benchmark is astonishing: It performed a computation in under five minutes that would take one of today’s fastest supercomputers 1025 or 10 septillion years. If you want to write it out, it’s 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years. This mind-boggling number exceeds known timescales in physics and vastly exceeds the age of the universe. It lends credence to the notion that quantum computation occurs in many parallel universes, in line with the idea that we live in a multiverse, a prediction first made by David Deutsch.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:04 pm to Jim Rockford
Dude you been in a coma?
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:09 pm to Jim Rockford
Google salesman trying to make money.
I'm not convinced.
I'm not convinced.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:11 pm to Jim Rockford
I swear the parallel me better be a fricking millionaire or I quit
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:12 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years. This mind-boggling number exceeds known timescales in physics and vastly exceeds the age of the universe
But hasn't exceeded the spending in congress.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:12 pm to Jim Rockford
I must be living in an alternate universe because I swear this is 5th time Google's done this
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:13 pm to Jim Rockford
Until it accesses a sex tape of Jennifer Anniston I dont care.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:19 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:Oh, okay, sure.
Google Quantum AI founder Hartmut Neven wrote in his blog post that this chip was so mind-boggling fast that it must have borrowed computational power from other universes
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:20 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
It performed a computation in under five minutes that would take one of today’s fastest supercomputers 1025 or 10 septillion years. If you want to write it out, it’s 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years. This mind-boggling number exceeds known timescales in physics and vastly exceeds the age of the universe. It lends credence to the notion that quantum computation occurs in many parallel universes, in line with the idea that we live in a multiverse, a prediction first made by David Deutsch.
“Something we built did something really fast, so that proves the multiverse is real”.
OK
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:22 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
Ergo the chip’s performance indicates that parallel universes exist and “we live in a multiverse.”
But anyway, we'll be long dead before quantum computers become mainstream. Cool stuff though.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:22 pm to Jim Rockford
I asked for a large fries. This is clearly a medium.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:27 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
today’s fastest supercomputers 1025 or 10 septillion years.
So 1,025 or 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years? That is a massive disparity.
This post was edited on 12/18/24 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:31 pm to Jim Rockford
How do we know their result is correct?
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:37 pm to GumboPot
quote:
So 1,025 or 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years? That is a massive disparity.
Copy and paste typo. 10 superscript 25. 10 to the 25th power.
I think.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:37 pm to Midget Death Squad
its going to be the exact opposite of us. Like a mirror image. So you will just be extremely average!
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:38 pm to Jim Rockford
When is this chip going to be available in an IPhone?
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:41 pm to Novae
quote:
How do we know their result is correct?
How dare you ask a question! Just shut up and trust the science.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:44 pm to Jim Rockford
Three things I perceive as (largely) snake oil
1) Quantum computing
2) Thermonuclear fusion as a practical, human-controlled energy source
3) "AI"- I don't think it can even be defined, and some of what falls under that rubric is cool, but computers are profoundly incapable of "knowing" things or attaining sentience.
1) Quantum computing
2) Thermonuclear fusion as a practical, human-controlled energy source
3) "AI"- I don't think it can even be defined, and some of what falls under that rubric is cool, but computers are profoundly incapable of "knowing" things or attaining sentience.
Posted on 12/18/24 at 1:52 pm to GumboPot
quote:
o 1,025 or 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years?
They were trying to say 10^25 (or 1 with 25 zeros behind it) years. Same value, two different formats.
Popular
Back to top

17











