- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Jeff Landry steps up effort to sell overhaul of tax system to state legislators
Posted on 10/2/24 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 10/2/24 at 10:17 pm
LINK
quote:
Gov. Jeff Landry spent several hours Wednesday trying to get Republican legislators on board with his plan to dramatically rewrite Louisiana’s tax code during a special session he wants to call in November.
Landry won generally favorable reviews when he pitched his proposals in separate private meetings with House and Senate Republicans, a day after unveiling his plan to get them to lower individual and corporate income taxes in exchange for renewing an expiring sales tax and for imposing sales taxes on many purchases and activities that go untaxed today.
The administration sent a package of 10 different tax bills to legislators that spell out the proposed changes to the tax system.
quote:
As previously reported, Landry wants legislators to approve a single flat tax of 3% to replace the current individual income system that has three rates. The governor also wants to raise the standard deduction from $4,500 per taxpayer to $12,500 to offset the higher taxes that low-income taxpayers would face by going to the flat tax. Seniors would receive a $25,000 standard deduction.
Landry also wants to collapse the two corporate income tax rates into a single rate of 5% and eliminate the corporate franchise tax, which is generally a tax on capital.
Landry would offset the revenue losses in part by having legislators renew the temporary .45-cent sales tax that is scheduled to expire on June 30.
Landry also wants to raise money by making a host of activities subject to state sales taxes. Those items, two of the bills show, include digital streaming services such as Amazon Prime, printing and copying services, laundry cleaning, newsletters, subscriptions to genealogical databases, interior decorating, personal fitness training services, pet grooming, spa services and tattoos.
Landry also wants to eliminate on Jan. 1 the granting of new tax breaks that aim to generate investment in Louisiana but that produce a low rate of return on taxes. These include such programs as the Motion Picture Investor Tax Credit, Enterprise Zones, Quality Jobs, Angel Investor, Rehabilitation of Historic Structures and a break for horizontal well drilling.
Posted on 10/2/24 at 10:19 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Aren’t some of those in the second to last paragraph already taxed?
This post was edited on 10/2/24 at 10:20 pm
Posted on 10/3/24 at 12:15 am to tiger91
I don’t believe so. Maybe at the local level, but I don’t even think that.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 12:23 am to BigJim
I’m fundamentally opposed to “services” being subject to a “sales” tax. Sales taxes should only be levied for sales of tangible goods.
I also reject the false notion that any tax cut needs to be offset or revenue neutral. Instead, cut the taxes and cut the government to pay for it.
This entire scheme is a disaster. Conservatives need to mobilize. Let the Edwards sales tax increase expire for good.
I also reject the false notion that any tax cut needs to be offset or revenue neutral. Instead, cut the taxes and cut the government to pay for it.
This entire scheme is a disaster. Conservatives need to mobilize. Let the Edwards sales tax increase expire for good.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 5:35 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This is dumb. Trading income taxes for sales taxes. The state has tried to lure new business with ITEP. I think it is more than taxes hindering the state.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 5:44 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Why do I get the feeling Landry is going to screw up the state worse than it has been since Reconstruction.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:40 am to Creolekid
quote:Why? More people with skin in the game through sales taxes than income taxes.
This is dumb. Trading income taxes for sales taxes
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:47 am to Riverside
quote:
I’m fundamentally opposed to “services” being subject to a “sales” tax. Sales taxes should only be levied for sales of tangible goods.
serious question- why?
A service is a transaction that usually includes most of the overhead associated with tangible goods - police enforcement, fire protection, etc. what’s the distinction?
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:49 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I’m stuck at dog grooming and home repairs being taxed. Why can’t he just propose a flat tax and call it a day?
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:58 am to Creolekid
Decrease income tax and increase sales tax is great idea. If you work and want to save you have an opportunity by cutting your spending . If you don’t pay income taxes at all ( which I’m sure 70% of New Orleans doesn’t ) then you’ll pay some more taxes on those rims and swisher sweets .
Posted on 10/3/24 at 6:59 am to Jake88
quote:One of the problems with income taxes, both state and federal, is that nearly 50% of people pay no tax whatsoever, and then get a windfall disguised as a “refund.” Make everyone pay something.
Why? More people with skin in the game through sales taxes than income taxes
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:02 am to shrevetigertom
quote:Exactly.
One of the problems with income taxes, both state and federal, is that nearly 50% of people pay no tax whatsoever, and then get a windfall disguised as a “refund.” Make everyone pay something
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:20 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Sales tax is the fairest form of taxation
Income tax is pure theft. No one,not even a government, has a moral or ethical right to take away from anyone’s rightfully earned income.
Moving to a sales tax system would be morally and economically sensical. We would immediately attract wealth from Mississippi , Arkansas and Alabama who tax income and we’d stop the drain of wealth leaving here for Texas and other states with no income tax.
Income tax is pure theft. No one,not even a government, has a moral or ethical right to take away from anyone’s rightfully earned income.
Moving to a sales tax system would be morally and economically sensical. We would immediately attract wealth from Mississippi , Arkansas and Alabama who tax income and we’d stop the drain of wealth leaving here for Texas and other states with no income tax.
This post was edited on 10/3/24 at 7:21 am
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:25 am to Creolekid
quote:
This is dumb. Trading income taxes for sales taxes. The state has tried to lure new business with ITEP. I think it is more than taxes hindering the state.
Yeah, 39% are unemployable so they dont pay income taxes or are paying into payroll taxes.
We are one of the worst states for this.
We also have the highest percent on disability under the age of 64.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:29 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
this plan would increase my tax burden, since I do not pay state income tax, it would also cost more to collect
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:32 am to dgnx6
I had no idea I didn't pay state taxes to get my dog groomed.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:36 am to TDFreak
quote:
Why do I get the feeling Landry is going to screw up the state worse than it has been since Reconstruction.
Because he’s dumber than a bag of rocks and trying to appeal to out of state right wingers. He’s Bobby Jindal without a brain.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:38 am to TBoy
quote:
Because he’s dumber than a bag of rocks
That's rich.
Posted on 10/3/24 at 7:40 am to CSATiger
quote:
this plan would increase my tax burden, since I do not pay state income tax
Not sure why you don't pay state tax, but it made me think of retired state workers who have tax exempt pensions. Requiring them to pay state sales tax is kind of changing their deal.
Whether they should or shouldn’t be tax exempt is a different argument. Changing the deal on them after the fact seems wrong.
This post was edited on 10/3/24 at 8:41 am
Popular
Back to top


9






