Started By
Message
locked post

If Walz happened to do or say something crazy tonight, will Kamala be able to replace him?

Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:51 pm
Posted by 308
the backwoods of Mississippi
Member since Sep 2020
3109 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:51 pm
Or is it too late?

Shapiro was the better choice.
This post was edited on 10/1/24 at 4:52 pm
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
21556 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:52 pm to
First of all, it's not Harris who would make that decision.
Secondly, Waltz was chosen for a reason. He will not be replaced.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
41013 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:52 pm to
The media will tell the world he didn't say it. If that doesn't work, he didn't mean it. And if that doesn't work, you should agree with what he said.
Posted by 053wab
Charlotte NC
Member since May 2023
269 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:52 pm to
What about Vance? If Trump says something crazy, can he drop the orange cheeto cult leader?
Posted by Kcrad
Diamondhead
Member since Nov 2010
65389 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

The media will tell the world he didn't say it. If that doesn't work, he didn't mean it. And if that doesn't work, you should agree with what he said.
He's already said he gets too excited and has trouble with his grammar.
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
30251 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:54 pm to
Shapiro ain’t jumping on a sinking ship. That’s why he wasn’t chosen weeks ago. Same with Newsome, the dude from Kentucky and anyone else with a pulse.
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
38932 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:55 pm to
Shapiro was the obvious choice. Too bad for him the democrats hate the Jews so much it would never happen
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
11191 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

What about Vance? If Trump says something crazy, can he drop the orange cheeto cult leader?

No because unlike democrats, the process of electing our nominee was done like it was supposed to be done. Only democrats use any means necessary to retain power.
You would think after the threat to democracy cries, democrats would use democracy to work like it’s supposed to rather than replace a nominee that was chosen by its voters.
Posted by Bonkers119
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
11691 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:56 pm to
Why would she replace a candidate that has a +4 favorability rating? Maybe Trump should replace Vance since his is -13.
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
9052 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:57 pm to
Which of these would make her sacrifice him?

“I think abortion as contractions begin is AOK”
“I think breaking federal law by flying in illegals is AOK”
“I believe free speech should be curtailed and punished if something is being said that I disagree with”
“Forcing taxpayers to pay more so Minnesota high schools have tampon dispensers in boys bathrooms is AOK”
“Illegal aliens should be able to vote”
“Violent destruction of government property should not be punished, but walking through any federal building after having been invited in by federal law enforcement should lead to years in prison”
“Drinking the semen of horses is acceptable, and, in moderation, can be healthy”

WTF could he say that the media wouldn’t agree with whole heartedly?
This post was edited on 10/1/24 at 4:59 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
78245 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 4:59 pm to
Where do you people come from?
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66950 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 5:06 pm to
Walz has already won the debate. Articles have already been written.
Just waiting til it's over to press "send".
Posted by lsuson
Metairie
Member since Oct 2013
15037 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 5:09 pm to
Nope
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
83776 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 5:10 pm to
There's nothing the corporate media cannot gaslight their way through. Having to replace Walz would devastate the Dems beyond the presidential race, and the MSM simply will not allow that.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19406 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

If Walz happened to do or say something crazy tonight, will Kamala be able to replace him?
well sure.

Democrat voters will be right on that, just like they were for Kamala.

Next up Paranormal: Not Caught On Camera... Kamala Harris primary voters.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141568 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 5:11 pm to
Word on the street is she may replace with Michelle.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
47264 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 5:12 pm to
i wonder if walz will make a sofa joke tonight
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
15084 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 5:33 pm to
His China ties are coming out...

She already let it out about sleep deprivation the day she picked em...

Who knows

They know its in the bag the way they are acting.

Needs to be too big to rig.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93895 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Why would she replace a candidate that has a +4 favorability rating?


Where does he have that Beijing?
Posted by TigerBaitOohHaHa
Member since Jan 2023
1776 posts
Posted on 10/1/24 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

Why would she replace a candidate that has a +4 favorability rating? Maybe Trump should replace Vance since his is -13.


you're right. Harris/Walz pretty much has this thing all sealed up. She's a sure thing. You probably don't even need to vote this cycle. Voting is a pain, stay home.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram