- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Brian Kelly says he feels better about LSU’s physicality after watching the film.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:07 pm
32
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:08 pm to Captain Crown
To quote Brian Kelly, “we see it differently”
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:08 pm to Captain Crown
He's either blind or in denial. I'm not sure which is worse
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:09 pm to Ping Pong
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:09 pm to Ping Pong
quote:
He's either blind or in denial. I'm not sure which is worse
could have sleepy Joe disease?
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:10 pm to Captain Crown
That post confuses the hell out of me. He says he feels better about our physicality, then says that our offensive line isn’t physical enough and can’t knock people off the ball?
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:12 pm to The Truth 34
Cubelic said the same shite
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:14 pm to Captain Crown
It sounds like he's having a stroke during that quote... not very Kelly like.
The whole purpose of games vs FCS schools is to dominate early, and pull starters by the 3rd Q to give them rest and backups more PT. So, there is sense in getting physical and pushing Nichols around so you can have 50+ yd runs and put the game away.
As for "flexing" against 7-8 man fronts, he tried that against USC and it didn't work. I'm not sure if we can even run against a Dime front as things stand.
The whole purpose of games vs FCS schools is to dominate early, and pull starters by the 3rd Q to give them rest and backups more PT. So, there is sense in getting physical and pushing Nichols around so you can have 50+ yd runs and put the game away.
As for "flexing" against 7-8 man fronts, he tried that against USC and it didn't work. I'm not sure if we can even run against a Dime front as things stand.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:15 pm to Captain Crown
Kelly is a fraud. I no longer believe anything that guy says
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:15 pm to LSBoosie
I can't even interpret that quote.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:17 pm to Captain Crown
Has Brian Kelly had his annual vision exam. At his age we lose our faculties very quickly.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:18 pm to Captain Crown
Defenses will continue to stack the box and keep two safeties deep against LSU. In 2nd half against USC the LSU offense failed to take what the USC defense was giving them. Just continue to take what defenses give you until they change. When they drop back then run at the defense.
This post was edited on 9/9/24 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:18 pm to Captain Crown
What does that even mean?
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:18 pm to Captain Crown
BK would fit the TD contrarian role very well if we need another one.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:20 pm to SmoothBox
What I’m gathering is he’s saying that they wanted to call plays based on how the defense was lining up, so if they were crowding the box he wasn’t gonna run just to prove a point. It’s an absolutely ridiculous comment but I’m pretty sure that’s what he’s saying.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:23 pm to Captain Crown
I havent gone back to rewatch and diagnose the running plays, but maybe they saw on film that its more of a running back issue? Emery was effective at running the ball against USC. Maybe the backs we just have now don't have the vision/patience to run behind our line.
I would still say it's an issue to some degree though, we should have had running lanes open up big enough for a Mack truck against Nicholls so anyone could have seen the hole to run through, but I will give them offense some benefit of the doubt, but the running game has to be there this year if LSU is going to have any chance at a decent record/playoff potential.
I would still say it's an issue to some degree though, we should have had running lanes open up big enough for a Mack truck against Nicholls so anyone could have seen the hole to run through, but I will give them offense some benefit of the doubt, but the running game has to be there this year if LSU is going to have any chance at a decent record/playoff potential.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:23 pm to LSUGent
Our RB vision sucks.
Half our run plays result in a rb running into one of our blockers.
Half our run plays result in a rb running into one of our blockers.
This post was edited on 9/9/24 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:33 pm to Captain Crown
Better beat South Carolina. Can’t sugarcoat that loss.
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:40 pm to Captain Crown
Well ..why was it so important to try and do that vs USC?
Posted on 9/9/24 at 12:40 pm to 304tiger
quote:
can't even interpret that quote.
He's saying our OL IS physical and CAN knock people off the ball. (I think)
Page 1 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News