- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Those JFK documents people want released
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:42 pm
I'm curious why anyone would think releasing the JFK documents would actually reveal anything nefarious? I mean, do you really think there's a xerox of a sticky note that says "Team 3 will be on the gnoll?" Or an autopsy report that states: "brain shows entry from frontal wound. Be sure to incinerate."
Anything of value was redacted, falsified, removed, etc before this stuff was sealed. They didn't have the Warren Commission just to save all the "real" stuff for posterity, to be opened at a later date. You're going to get less than Geraldo got from Al Capone's vault when they finally publish this stuff.
Anything of value was redacted, falsified, removed, etc before this stuff was sealed. They didn't have the Warren Commission just to save all the "real" stuff for posterity, to be opened at a later date. You're going to get less than Geraldo got from Al Capone's vault when they finally publish this stuff.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:44 pm to Smeg
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:45 pm to Smeg
quote:
I'm curious why anyone would think releasing the JFK documents would actually reveal anything nefarious?
Because there were people at the CIA in on it. That’s basically a fact at this point. It’s written down somewhere and I suspect that Bill Hicks is correct that they show the newly elected President shots of the Kennedy assassination from an angle that you’ve never seen before that suspiciously looks off the grassy knoll.
The only problem is everyone who was directly involved are now dead, so can’t get real justice on it.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:49 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Because there were people at the CIA in on it.
quite possibly.
what could be so bad that it needs to remain covered up for 60 years?
even trump didn't reveal it despite his promise to do so.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:49 pm to Smeg
If there is nothing to see, then why don't they release it?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:51 pm to Smeg
quote:
Those JFK documents people want released
Why should a government of the people/for the people want to hide something like this if there isn't anything to hide?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:53 pm to Boks
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:55 pm to uggabugga
quote:
quite possibly.
what could be so bad that it needs to remain covered up for 60 years?
Because then people will figure out that the CIA is still doing this shite alongside shite like MKUltra, of which Crooks was almost certainly a part of or whatever the CIA is calling it internally now.
EDIT: And by the way, two future Presidents could have been directly in on JFK’s assassination: LBJ and George HW Bush.
LBJ I’m not sure if he knew about it before he was shot, but he certainly knew about it afterwards and shut his trap for the rest of his life.
As for Bush he was once asked by a reporter where he was when JFK was assassinated and he replied that he couldn’t recall…. ummmmm, WHAT?! You were in the CIA and like 39 at the time. Wouldn’t that be suspicious if anyone who is say 32 and older that couldn’t tell you where they were on 9/11 if they don’t have dementia, nevertheless that person being in the CIA at the time?
Now Bush came back an hour later and said he now remembered that he was in Tyler, Texas, which is only about an hour’s drive from the scene of the crime and an even shorter flight. Now I’m not saying Bush pulled the trigger, but help execute the plan, absolutely.
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:55 pm to Smeg
If whatever is released doesn't confirm the various conspiracies, the release will then be considered part of the conspiracy...
It will be considered false, mis-direction, incomplete, etc
It will just add more topics to the discussion/argument of "who shot JFK and why"
I wish they would release everything at this point.. and let the chips fall
It will be considered false, mis-direction, incomplete, etc
It will just add more topics to the discussion/argument of "who shot JFK and why"
I wish they would release everything at this point.. and let the chips fall
Posted on 9/3/24 at 1:57 pm to uggabugga
quote:
Because there were people at the CIA in on it.
quote:
what could be so bad that it needs to remain covered up for 60 years?
A future president orchestrated the whole thing, was in Dallas, and flown out of Dallas by Barry Seal.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 2:00 pm to Hangit
quote:
A future president orchestrated the whole thing, was in Dallas, and flown out of Dallas by Barry Seal.
A future president orchestrated it all right. And he was flown out of Dallas afterwards. But unless Barry Seal was flying Air Force One, we’re not talking about the same future president.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 2:00 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I suspect that Bill Hicks is correct that they show the newly elected President shots of the Kennedy assassination from an angle that you’ve never seen before that suspiciously looks off the grassy knoll.
I'm not being coy here but I truly don't understand. If it's as big of a deal as this thread says, and tehre is essnetially proof that the govt was behind the killing...why on earth would "they" (whoever they are?) show every new president all this stuff? Why not just keep quiet and let it die out forever, or better yet just destroy it entirely?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 2:02 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
I'm not being coy here but I truly don't understand. If it's as big of a deal as this thread says, and tehre is essnetially proof that the govt was behind the killing...why on earth would "they" (whoever they are?) show every new president all this stuff?
As a warning not to get too far out of line.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 2:03 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
I'm not being coy here but I truly don't understand. If it's as big of a deal as this thread says, and tehre is essnetially proof that the govt was behind the killing...why on earth would "they" (whoever they are?) show every new president all this stuff? Why not just keep quiet and let it die out forever, or better yet just destroy it entirely?
So they know the consequences if the President actually stands up to the Deep State.
Posted on 9/3/24 at 2:05 pm to Smeg
quote:
I'm curious why anyone would think releasing the JFK documents would actually reveal anything nefarious?
Well you do not spend 6 decades hiding information that's a nothing burger. I mean if you really are looking for a reason people are curious.
This post was edited on 9/3/24 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 9/3/24 at 2:23 pm to Smeg
Why has it not been released in 60 years
Posted on 9/3/24 at 2:28 pm to Smeg
So hiding information for 50 plus years with little hope of seeing the crookedness of the government means nothing ? Don’t you suspect there is a reason still why it’s hidden ?
Posted on 9/3/24 at 2:30 pm to Smeg
Most thinking people have accepted that the killing was CIA directed.
Most thinking people haven’t come to grasp with ‘the why’, in spite of ‘the why’ being much stronger now that it was then.
Most thinking people haven’t come to grasp with ‘the why’, in spite of ‘the why’ being much stronger now that it was then.
Popular
Back to top

19










