- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU Pitching Stats last 3 seasons with 3 different coaches
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:03 am
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:03 am
2024
4.36 era 733K 267 BB allowed
.233 avg 59 HR (this was a very offensive year across the conference)
2023
4.47 era 798K 271 BB
.225 avg 76 HR allowed
2022
4.32 era 610K 220 BB
.240 avg 72 HR allowed
2021
4.53 era 568K 216 BB PM philosophy was pitch to contact
.252 93 HR allowed
Pretty consistent no matter who the pitching coach has been
4.36 era 733K 267 BB allowed
.233 avg 59 HR (this was a very offensive year across the conference)
2023
4.47 era 798K 271 BB
.225 avg 76 HR allowed
2022
4.32 era 610K 220 BB
.240 avg 72 HR allowed
2021
4.53 era 568K 216 BB PM philosophy was pitch to contact
.252 93 HR allowed
Pretty consistent no matter who the pitching coach has been
This post was edited on 6/26/24 at 9:39 am
13
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:06 am to nicholastiger
Now do the Rougarou
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:09 am to nicholastiger
733 K in 66 games is 11.1 strikeouts per game
798 K in 71 games (2023) is 11.2 strikeouts per game
Crazy how similar that is when you factor in Skenes had eleventy billion strikeouts in 2023 for us
798 K in 71 games (2023) is 11.2 strikeouts per game
Crazy how similar that is when you factor in Skenes had eleventy billion strikeouts in 2023 for us
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:11 am to nicholastiger
2023 stats are elevated due to Skenes
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:11 am to thunderbird1100
not to mention the starting weekend pitching has been turned over every season
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:13 am to nicholastiger
They were all extremely different tho.
In 2022, Kelly had the least amount of talent in that group, so imo I was most impressed with him. Skenes propped up the staff in 2023, which was discussed plenty. Yeskie probably had the deepest room of all those guys, which probably should’ve led to some better results.
In 2022, Kelly had the least amount of talent in that group, so imo I was most impressed with him. Skenes propped up the staff in 2023, which was discussed plenty. Yeskie probably had the deepest room of all those guys, which probably should’ve led to some better results.
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:13 am to nicholastiger
All 3 years they had approximately 3.5 strikeouts to walks ratio.
2022 - 3.6 K/BB
2023 - 3.3
2024 - 3.6
2022 - 3.6 K/BB
2023 - 3.3
2024 - 3.6
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:15 am to Tigerfan14
Starting pitching wasn’t good in 2022 but you had some dudes in the bullpen that were pretty good.
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:18 am to nicholastiger
Interesting. I'd say it would be more interesting to see how we do in Year 2 of Yeskie, but the staff is gonna be almost completely different, so he'll be working with most guys for the 1st time again this year. Only a handful of guys that will wind up being the guys we count on will have been here last year, making this the 2nd year Yeskie has had them. But we'll get to see how Anderson develops, hopefully Herring as a starter, maybe Loer, and a couple of other guys that we didn't see much of this year but stick around.
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:19 am to Flablete
quote:hate when people do this shite. Take out any teams best pitcher and you can say their team stats are “elevated.”
2023 stats are elevated due to Skenes
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:19 am to nicholastiger
Can you add Mainieris last season
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:19 am to Hot Carl
The ERA stats are not fully meaningful without the context of the average ERA in the country for that year.
ERA on its own doesn't say a whole lot if you don't know the run environment.
ERA on its own doesn't say a whole lot if you don't know the run environment.
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:57 am to ell_13
quote:99% of the time I agree with this statement. Your point still stands and you’re correct, but Skenes is still an outlier. Replace Skenes numbers with our next best from the past 4 years and I bet it looks a good bit different.
hate when people do this shite. Take out any teams best pitcher and you can say their team stats are “elevated.”
Posted on 6/26/24 at 9:57 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
ERA on its own doesn't say a whole lot if you don't know the run environment.
Exactly. A 4.35 staff ERA this year was pretty damn good considering the amount of offense across the board in CBB
Posted on 6/26/24 at 10:10 am to ProjectP2294
quote:
The ERA stats are not fully meaningful without the context of the average ERA in the country for that year.
ERA on its own doesn't say a whole lot if you don't know the run environment.
Looking at the median ERA team on NCAA's website each year it's:
2024 - 6.02/6.03 (295 teams, looked at teams 147/148)
2023 - 5.95 (295 teams, again looked at teams 147/148)
2022 - 5.68 (293 teams, looked at teams 146/147)
So pretty close last 2 years but 2022 definitely brings down the 2022 number significance a bit.
A 4.32 ERA in 2022 would be more like a 4.58 ERA in 2024.
This post was edited on 6/26/24 at 10:12 am
Posted on 6/26/24 at 10:13 am to nicholastiger
I think things would look better if JJ would just commit to a Sunday rotation. Not saying I know more ball than a guy who made 3 trips to Omaha, but that appears to be the glaring let down of his pitching staff right now. Commit to a guy and let him develop over the course of the season.
Posted on 6/26/24 at 10:13 am to nicholastiger
National ranks per year is probably more useful here than the raw data
ETA: clearly others beat me to it
ETA: clearly others beat me to it
This post was edited on 6/26/24 at 10:14 am
Posted on 6/26/24 at 10:28 am to nicholastiger
In the SEC were:
6th in BA
6th in slugging
7th in OBP
5th in total bases
5th in RBIs
5th in ERA
3rd in Opp BA
1st in strikeouts
7th in hits allowed
11th in walks allowed
7th in fielding pct
We really were about the 5th or 6th best team in the conference but just weren't clutch at the end of a few games. Still finished T7th, and likely should've been a bit better.
Our conference was pretty fricking absurd this season.
6th in BA
6th in slugging
7th in OBP
5th in total bases
5th in RBIs
5th in ERA
3rd in Opp BA
1st in strikeouts
7th in hits allowed
11th in walks allowed
7th in fielding pct
We really were about the 5th or 6th best team in the conference but just weren't clutch at the end of a few games. Still finished T7th, and likely should've been a bit better.
Our conference was pretty fricking absurd this season.
Posted on 6/26/24 at 10:29 am to DeafJam73
quote:
think things would look better if JJ would just commit to a Sunday rotation. N
For '24, I think he tentatively slotted Holman, Jump, and Hurd as weekend starters. But Hurd stumbled and seemed like everyone we tried struggled.
ETA: I agree with your thought though and perhaps using the midweek games as an opportunity to develop a 4th starter as opposed to giving a bunch of guys reps.
This post was edited on 6/26/24 at 10:33 am
Posted on 6/26/24 at 10:34 am to AlwysATgr
We got too behind the 8 ball to develop anyone in conference play i suppose, but i wanted it to be anderson
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News