- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:29 pm to udtiger
CALIFORNIA LOVE
As Tupac would say
As Tupac would say
quote:
so california is about to get the full stampede of illegals coming across the boarder while texas is about to cut border crossing down to a few hundered a day
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:29 pm to keakar
quote:
that means texas is out so their olny other land bridge is southern california,
Uh, you're forgetting NM and AZ. AZ shares a full southern border with Mexico.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:30 pm to bbvdd
Make them go thru California. Texas is closed.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:30 pm to bbvdd
UH HUH TEXAS
My State
What is the difference of arresting a bank robber at First National Bank (a Federal crime) and arresting a non-legal citizen for any other Federal crime?
THEN DEPORT THE GUILTY.
My State
What is the difference of arresting a bank robber at First National Bank (a Federal crime) and arresting a non-legal citizen for any other Federal crime?
THEN DEPORT THE GUILTY.
This post was edited on 3/19/24 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:31 pm to bbvdd
I hope the TNM is making big headway in drawing support during this cycle
They've got a lot to work with here
They've got a lot to work with here
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:32 pm to bbvdd
quote:
Supreme Court just ruled that TX can deport illegals
This is good.
quote:
The conservative-majority court, with three liberal justices dissenting, rejected an emergency request made by the Biden administration, which said states have no authority to legislate on immigration, an issue the federal government has sole authority over.
It’s nice when they admit that they’re intentionally allowing this to happen. That doesn’t happen everyday.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:33 pm to Northshoretiger87
quote:
Anyone liberal claiming John Roberts is a conservative is fooling himself.
Nobody is claiming that anymore really, but he still has his blind squirrel moments occasionally. I was thinking it was sort of refreshing to actually see a good ole "party line" 6-3 ruling.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:33 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I hope the TNM is making big headway in drawing support during this cycle
Exponential headway.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:34 pm to bbvdd
Yes, and no.
This was steeped in the weeds of appellate procedure and the reticence of the SCOTUS jumping into something prematurely. It is not a blessing by the Court of the Texas law.
And I would expect the 5th Circuit to get involved shortly.
This was steeped in the weeds of appellate procedure and the reticence of the SCOTUS jumping into something prematurely. It is not a blessing by the Court of the Texas law.
And I would expect the 5th Circuit to get involved shortly.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:34 pm to bbvdd
Once they’re done kicking out the Mexicans they’re gonna round up the Louisianans that moved there just to find a job
They’re not sending their best people folks
They’re not sending their best people folks
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:35 pm to bbvdd
r/politics thread on this is hilarious
Inject this into my veins!
quote:
TitaniumTacos 5m
If this continues I might have to intervene
quote:
AccuratePassion2572 now
Basically if you're not white keep your id on you at all times. Hell keep your birth certificate in your car too. This is the lowest form of discrimination.
quote:
Green_Flamingo_5835 OP 5m
And if we elect him again, we'll get three more who are just as loyal to a terror organization
Inject this into my veins!
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:36 pm to Lou Pai
quote:
I'd be willing to pay substantially more in sales and property tax if it meant we were adding an army of deportation agents.
We already have some of the highest property taxes in the nation. No thanks
How about we tax liberals at 35% on everything and whatever revenue is generated from that, it goes to hiring DPS agents They would be stuck in a conundrum - stay in TX while your tax money funds what you hate or leave and get stuck in a crap state.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:37 pm to EKG
So if Texas can arrest and deport illegals now, can we assume that this will also deter illegals from traveling to TX once they’ve entered the country from another state like Cali? Similar legislation in other states across the south would have a multiplier effect.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:37 pm to bbvdd
quote:
Uh, you're forgetting NM and AZ. AZ shares a full southern border with Mexico.
dammit, dont mess up my dream of sending all the illegals into california lol
maybe NM and AZ will copy the texas law and do the same, you know they sure as hell dont want any part of the texas invasion comming their way
This post was edited on 3/19/24 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:38 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
Yeah LA needs to get in on this immediately if so
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:39 pm to bbvdd
Just imagine opposing this law as a matter of policy.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:42 pm to bbvdd
The damage has already been done
Posted on 3/19/24 at 1:42 pm to bbvdd
After reading that ruling and dissent, the court rejected the stay on the law based on the fact that the 5th Corcuit used an “administrative stay” incorrectly, in this case letting the “administrative stay” carry on for too long without judging that the case did or did not have merits to enact a “stay pending appeal”.
The judgment says nothing about the constitutionality of the Texas law.
This is a temporary win for Texas (and honestly the nation as a whole) as best I can tell.
The constitutionality of said law will be determined later down the judicial line in currently ongoing cases.
Someone feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Hopefully Texas sends as many of them out as possible before the constitutionality case is decided… there is precedent for the FedGov being the sole authority regarding entry and denial in immigration cases. With that said, there doesn’t seem to be any precedent set for “what happens when the FedGov isn’t working as it should?”.
The judgment says nothing about the constitutionality of the Texas law.
This is a temporary win for Texas (and honestly the nation as a whole) as best I can tell.
The constitutionality of said law will be determined later down the judicial line in currently ongoing cases.
Someone feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Hopefully Texas sends as many of them out as possible before the constitutionality case is decided… there is precedent for the FedGov being the sole authority regarding entry and denial in immigration cases. With that said, there doesn’t seem to be any precedent set for “what happens when the FedGov isn’t working as it should?”.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News