Started By
Message

re: CFB Commissioners discussed growing the playoff field to 14 teams

Posted on 2/22/24 at 8:12 am to
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
54312 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 8:12 am to
Agree with a lot of that. Multiple rounds of neutral site games is stupid.
This post was edited on 2/22/24 at 8:32 am
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7972 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Right because college football is in such good shape right now


it was before they started fricking with it
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
22059 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 9:05 am to
Big time games with college stadium atmospheres that are rocking are way more fun to watch on TV than neutral site games in NFL stadiums anyway
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7972 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Byes at least reward the teams who had a special season.


so does not letting in 3 and 4 loss teams.
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
258 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 9:11 am to
You guys are hilarious with your whining because you fans of the big teams will now have more hurdles thrown at you. Most of your big boy teams played 3 meaningful games this past year.

I can understand your angst that now you have to win more games on the field and can’t just ride the pre-season ranking to a 4 team invite. Bama won 1 meaningful game this past season and got invited, You Bama fans already know this. Michigan won 3 meaningful games and were crowned the mythical champ. Now, they’ll have to play more and are scared to death. The lower tier teams love this. What would Michigan look like if they had to play 2 more rounds and McCarthy got hurt? What will UGA do next year if Beck goes down in round 1 or in the GT game with the playoffs looming?

An expanded playoff and the portal stripping depth is by far the two best thing that could have happened to a sport that has become stale with the same 10 teams the past 30 years. Upsets are going to happen no matter how many times you say they won’t. Most posters here were posting how Bama was just gonna waltz to the Natty and you gave Michigan no respect. We see how that turned out.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
54312 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 9:17 am to
Brother, I think you have it backwards. Michigan found a nice draw this year, but I don't think they could have beaten UGA and Texas or Oregon, too. Wisconsin or Ole Miss may get in the tournament now, so that's good. But, they are not going to win 3 or 4 games. What I'm saying is you're going to basically end up with UGA, Bama, or OSU as champs most years.

I also don't think the physical toll aspect is a good thing like you do. These teams are going to be beat to hell by mid January. Hopefully, they are not losing QBs in the semis.
Posted by tccdc
Washington, DC
Member since Sep 2007
3603 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 9:17 am to
If I am the ACC and Big 12, I eliminate my Championship Games if they are only going to allow 2 in...why have your top 2 take another loss and possibly lose out in the seeding...

And same for G5 also...why risk a possible home game because there was an upset in the game.

Lastly, does this officially push ND into a conference...if it is true..there is 1 one at large..

4 SEC
4 Big 10
2 ACC
2 Big 12
1 G5
1 At Large?
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
22059 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Bama won 1 meaningful game this past season and got invited, You Bama fans already know this
Tennessee finished #17, LSU finished #12, and Ole Miss finished #9. Plus Georgia at #4 in the SECCG

I don’t think any other big program had 4 wins before bowls/playoffs against teams that finished in the top 20. And I say that as a Bama hater who thought the committee royally screwed FSU.


quote:

Now, they’ll have to play more and are scared to death. The lower tier teams love this
Doubtful. Now they know they can lose 2 games and still be guaranteed a playoff spot. And be damn likely to get a spot even with 3 losses.

quote:

What would Michigan look like if they had to play 2 more rounds and McCarthy got hurt? What will UGA do next year if Beck goes down in round 1 or in the GT game with the playoffs looming?
Like FSU when Jordan Travis got hurt?

quote:

An expanded playoff and the portal stripping depth is by far the two best thing that could have happened to a sport that has become stale with the same 10 teams the past 30 years
Expanded playoff was fine, but they expanded it to too big of a field. 9-3 teams should not be making the playoff every year but that’ll happen with 12+ teams. Sure you’ll have a few upsets from time to time, but nobody outside of the top 5-6 will have a realistic chance to win 4 games in a row against that level of competition.

Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14638 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 10:03 am to
Folks, we're in the passing lane to the Superconferences taking over college football. The rest is a band-aid on a severed arm.
Posted by NEOJoe
Member since Dec 2021
615 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 10:48 am to
quote:

14 or more

quote:

more auto-bids

This would make the conference championship games even more meaningless than they’re going to be with the 12 team format. We are going to see a lot of NFL Week 18-style duds in the future college football.
This post was edited on 2/22/24 at 10:49 am
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64649 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 11:07 am to
quote:

so does not letting in 3 and 4 loss teams.


Totally agree. I liked the original BCS the best
Posted by John Casey
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2016
1674 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 11:12 am to
The only change that needs to be made is that all games should be on college campuses, except for the Final Four. I'd prefer just the title game being at neutral site, but they have to appease the traditional NY6 bowls.

It's silly how the top teams with a Bye won't get to host a home playoff game.
Posted by St Jean The Baptiste
Laredo, TX
Member since Aug 2015
5828 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 11:50 am to
8 would have been perfect.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7972 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Most of your big boy teams played 3 meaningful games this past year.


that's at least 2 and often 3 more than the non "Big Boys" play.
and the big boys do this weird thing where they score more points than they allowed. Thats called "winning".
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20777 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

An expanded playoff and the portal stripping depth


The rich are only getting richer with the current state of the portal. Go talk to coaches at places like ULL and ask them how fun it is to manage their roster when their best players leave for bigger schools after every season
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14857 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Multiple rounds of neutral site games is stupid.


Not if your goal is to make as much money as possible which is all this is about.
Posted by UAinSOUTHAL
Mobile,AL
Member since Dec 2012
4843 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:17 pm to
This is so dumb. No team outside the top 10 is winning a title anyway. I would say 12 is too many and it should have been 8
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32957 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

You guys are hilarious with your whining because you fans of the big teams will now have more hurdles thrown at you. Most of your big boy teams played 3 meaningful games this past year.

I can understand your angst that now you have to win more games on the field and can’t just ride the pre-season ranking to a 4 team invite. Bama won 1 meaningful game this past season and got invited, You Bama fans already know this. Michigan won 3 meaningful games and were crowned the mythical champ. Now, they’ll have to play more and are scared to death. The lower tier teams love this. What would Michigan look like if they had to play 2 more rounds and McCarthy got hurt? What will UGA do next year if Beck goes down in round 1 or in the GT game with the playoffs looming?

An expanded playoff and the portal stripping depth is by far the two best thing that could have happened to a sport that has become stale with the same 10 teams the past 30 years. Upsets are going to happen no matter how many times you say they won’t. Most posters here were posting how Bama was just gonna waltz to the Natty and you gave Michigan no respect. We see how that turned out.

I hate to break it to you, but this is far worse for lower tier teams than it is for upper tier teams.

No lower tier team is going to beat 4 top 10 P5 schools consecutively. The best teams are still going to win.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32957 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

What I'm saying is you're going to basically end up with UGA, Bama, or OSU as champs most years.

I wouldn't be so sure to include Alabama in that grouping (long term), but yeah Georgia and Ohio State are going to locks to make it in the playoff and will consistently have the most talent. IMO, Alabama would be in the next tier (teams that will make it most years) with Texas, Oregon, LSU, Clemson, Florida State, and Notre Dame.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32957 posts
Posted on 2/22/24 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

Lastly, does this officially push ND into a conference...if it is true..there is 1 one at large..

4 SEC
4 Big 10
2 ACC
2 Big 12
1 G5
1 At Large?

No way does the weak arse Big 12 get 2 teams in.

I would bet most years it's going to be:

3 or 4 SEC
3 or 4 B1G
2 ACC
1 Big 12
1 G5
1 Notre Dame possibly over the 4th SEC or B1G school
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram