- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:00 pm to SirWinston
quote:
It continues to dismay me that zero democrats have spoken out against this ruling.
And why would we? He’s a criminal and so are his worthless sons.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 12:01 pm
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:03 pm to L.A.
The idiot judge ran for office promising to "get Trump." So did the AG. That alone makes them criminals.
quote:
18 U.S.C. § 241
Conspiracy Against Rights
Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.
Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act.
The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty.
Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions.
MISCONDUCT BY LAW ENFORCEMENT & OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS
18 U.S.C. § 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. It is not necessary that the offense be motivated by racial bias or by any other animus.
Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards. However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.
Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct. Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law. Cases charged by federal prosecutors most often involve physical or sexual assaults. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for thefts, false arrests, evidence-planting, and failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:04 pm to teke184
quote:
’d try to claim MAL as worth that much to post the bond just to flip the bird.
You want a bird flip?
He needs to pull the money from a bond backed by Sberbank.
Heads would explode.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:08 pm to Leto II
We’re talking about Trump here not the Bidens. Keep up.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:08 pm to Leto II
You really want DAs campaigning on getting specific people?
I mean I’d like to see the entire Dem Congress be targeted like this if you are down.
I mean I’d like to see the entire Dem Congress be targeted like this if you are down.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:12 pm to Leto II
And you seem to be a groomer. Does your family know?
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:14 pm to Auburn1968
you send that to Alina Habba yet? She’ll know just what to do with it.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:16 pm to Leto II
quote:
And why would we?
Well I know at least one Dim who's getting Ukraine money. Congrats I guess
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:20 pm to Auburn1968
quote:
That alone makes them criminals.
Why do you think the MSM is already touting that "Trump is going to put all of his advisories in jail if he is elected (projected as if he were doing so like a dictator)"?
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:22 pm to L.A.
How is such a law even Constitutional? What's next? Grandfather Clauses?
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:22 pm to L.A.
Funny how Lina though trump wasn’t worth that much but yet they demand him to pay that much lol
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:22 pm to L.A.
EDIT: New York law may require a bond for the full amount. That’s a particularly harsh requirement. Too bad.
This post was edited on 2/20/24 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:23 pm to L.A.
Is this up to the discretion of the court or is this a common practice?
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:30 pm to Athis
quote:
common practice
In most states you have to post a bond to appeal a money judgment.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:33 pm to L.A.
4D Chess: Putin posts the bond
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:37 pm to Ray Ray Rodman
quote:
Penny change for Trump. He's the most richest, amazingly liquid, super duper katrillionaire there has ever been, ever. Should be no problem for him. Like a light lunch, if you will!
Liberals during Trump:
“We are losing our democracy!! The republic may not survive!! He is a dictator!!”
Liberals now: “Lawfare!! Yes!! Get him!! Attack him!! By any means!!! Tighten the screws!!!
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:38 pm to L.A.
November of 2024 can’t get here soon enough. Trump Win or loose (from dems cheating again ) I’m ready for $hit to hit the fan and have all this come to ahead . These dems will not stop until there is a total overhaul of corrupt Gov agencies.
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:41 pm to SirWinston
quote:
It continues to dismay me that zero democrats have spoken out against this ruling.
And where is Tulsi Gabbard? She’s not even a Dem anymore. Has she even spoken out?
Posted on 2/20/24 at 12:50 pm to TBoy
For the record, the 8th Amendment covers “excessive fines” and SCOTUS has held that it applies to the states, not just the Feds.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News