- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So-called "moon landing"
Posted on 2/21/24 at 11:13 pm to St Stooge
Posted on 2/21/24 at 11:13 pm to St Stooge
quote:
You do realize every time you repeat this you sound dumber than the previous time, right?
NASA has stated numerous times that they can't put a man on the moon today today dumbass. So I guess I'm as dumb as NASA.
4
Posted on 2/21/24 at 11:20 pm to saintsfan1977
Serious question - What makes you think the moon landing was fake?
Posted on 2/21/24 at 11:24 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
NASA has stated numerous times that they can't put a man on the moon today today dumbass. So I guess I'm as dumb as NASA.
The technology is there but no one wants to spend the money to do it. What’s the point when you can send unmanned rovers to collect the same information without the risk of human lives?
Artemis is still scheduled to go to the moon in the next few years, but ultimately there is a ton of political pressure and public criticism of NASA’s direction or lack thereof that drags these things out forever.
It’s not technology keeping us from the moon, it's unified public and political support.
This post was edited on 2/21/24 at 11:38 pm
Posted on 2/21/24 at 11:30 pm to CAD703X
Watch This
Great video talking about the moon landing conspiracy and if it is real or not.
Great video talking about the moon landing conspiracy and if it is real or not.
This post was edited on 2/21/24 at 11:32 pm
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:06 am to billjamin
quote:The most fascinating thing to me is the ratio of upvotes to downvotes which tells so much about the state of our society. Interpret that how you will...
These threads are always great.
Also, I was the 444th comment in this thread...
Posted on 2/22/24 at 12:21 am to CAD703X
If the World is spinning at 1,000 miles per hour, (that's what NASA claims) shouldn't a helicopter be able to hover in place and let it's destination come to it?
Posted on 2/22/24 at 3:49 am to saintsfan1977
quote:
NASA has stated numerous times that they can't put a man on the moon today today dumbass. So I guess I'm as dumb as NASA.
Because it hasn’t been an active project, you smooth brained imbecile. They could’ve fired it back up anytime there was motivation to return (and in fact currently are). frick, you are stupid.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:27 am to St Stooge
quote:
They could’ve fired it back up anytime there was motivation to return (and in fact currently are). frick, you are stupid.
Sure sure. We shut it down in 1972. Same year we ended the Vietnam War. Coincidence? Believe what you want you fricktard.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:29 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
Serious question - What makes you think the moon landing was fake?
1960s technology and the fact we couldn't go today because we don't have the capability according to Nasa. the picture of the Lunar Module as well as the moon photos with the astronauts in it. Whole thing seems fake.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 6:41 am to CutTheCord
quote:
If the World is spinning at 1,000 miles per hour, (that's what NASA claims) shouldn't a helicopter be able to hover in place and let it's destination come to it?
No. You can’t be serious with this question.
It’s no different than tossing a ball straight up in a moving car or train and it will fall right back into your hand.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 6:45 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
next denial should address the Hindenburg disaster? It must never have occurred because nothing the size of the Hindenburg has been built since. Right?
How do we know it was really that big? Are we taking their word for it? It does seem a bit extreme when you compare it to the others.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 6:45 am to CAD703X
You understand that the Soviets had penetrated NASA and the trip was tracked by them.
IT WAS THE MIDDLE IF THE COLD WAR! They would have frickING LOVED to have embarrasses us. That is the best prof for me.
IT WAS THE MIDDLE IF THE COLD WAR! They would have frickING LOVED to have embarrasses us. That is the best prof for me.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 6:56 am to saintsfan1977
quote:
1960s technology and the fact we couldn't go today because we don't have the capability according to Nasa.
In 1960 we had badasses working at NASA…today’s diversity hires…not so much.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 7:05 am to Cajun Tifoso
quote:
You understand that the Soviets had penetrated NASA and the trip was tracked by them.
IT WAS THE MIDDLE IF THE COLD WAR! They would have frickING LOVED to have embarrasses us. That is the best prof for me.
Don't bother; CADX won't respond because he can't and knows it.
Same thing with that other Luddite, saintsfan1977
Posted on 2/22/24 at 7:43 am to Cajun Tifoso
quote:
You understand that the Soviets had penetrated NASA and the trip was tracked by them.
IT WAS THE MIDDLE IF THE COLD WAR! They would have frickING LOVED to have embarrasses us. That is the best prof for me.
Lol that we successfully landed on that moon SIX TIMES in THREE YEARS along with the requisite climax "failure in space Apollo 13...tune in to see if they survive!!!"
.. Just as the ratings for the so-called "we on the moon, baw!" TV show were plummeting.
Now NASA gets to be heroes! Why you couldn't script a climax this good!
...oh wait
This post was edited on 2/22/24 at 7:45 am
Posted on 2/22/24 at 8:15 am to CAD703X
quote:
Lol that we successfully landed on that moon SIX TIMES in THREE YEARS along with the requisite climax "failure in space Apollo 13...tune in to see if they survive!!!"
Nice substantive response to the question of why wouldn't the Soviets have exposed the fake?
At least make your typical D- answers, not the pure gibberish you are spouting...
Posted on 2/22/24 at 8:38 am to TigerGman
Gibberish to question 6 flawless moon visits within 3 years and then nothing for the next 52? 
Oh wait; budget issues right?
Oh wait; budget issues right?
Posted on 2/22/24 at 8:41 am to CAD703X
quote:
Gibberish to question 6 flawless moon visits within 3 years and then nothing for the next 52?
Your pathetic inability to answer the question says everything about you that needs to be said. Quit humiliating yourself...
Posted on 2/22/24 at 8:49 am to saintsfan1977
quote:
NASA has stated numerous times that they can't put a man on the moon today today dumbass. So I guess I'm as dumb as NASA.
taking partial quotes out of context to build an argument and calling others "dumbass"
Posted on 2/22/24 at 9:09 am to saintsfan1977
quote:
Lockheed Martin didn't lose or destroy the tech to build an SR-72.
I bet they did. They've destroyed the jigs to build a C-5 that's still in service. I would imagine the SR-71 jigs suffered a similar fate.
Page 23 of 49
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News