- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Who was in the wrong here? (Cyclist vs pedestrian)
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:50 pm
68
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:51 pm to tiggerthetooth
Cyclist is always the answer.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:51 pm to tiggerthetooth
Well, the cyclist appears to be a fricking dumbass
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:51 pm to tiggerthetooth
Rule of Thumb: It's always the cyclist
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:51 pm to tiggerthetooth
cyclist
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:52 pm to tiggerthetooth
The fricking idiot trying to walk two dogs on a bicycle
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:52 pm to tiggerthetooth
Without context the pedestrian is correct, but I suspect they're both cunts.
This post was edited on 1/17/24 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:52 pm to tiggerthetooth
Easy the cyclist
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:53 pm to tiggerthetooth
Cyclist.
That guy in particular was a stupid a-hole.
That guy in particular was a stupid a-hole.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:53 pm to tiggerthetooth
Cyclist
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:53 pm to tiggerthetooth
I wonder if the dogs would’ve jumped in when I started beating that guys arse for running over me.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:53 pm to tiggerthetooth
Two shitty people doing shitty things. They are both idiots.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:54 pm to tiggerthetooth
The walker because she could have just sidestepped to the left 3 feet. The cyclist had two dogs, and her hands full.
The Walker was a count, even called it early, “I’m not moving!”
It’s called common courtesy
The Walker was a count, even called it early, “I’m not moving!”
It’s called common courtesy
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:54 pm to tiggerthetooth
Cyclist, no doubt. Why was he on the wrong side? Wh NO effort to evade? More worried about keeping his dogs in check than who he runs over.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:54 pm to tiggerthetooth
Cyclist - on the wrong side of the path and should have adjusted or stopped when she saw she was about to run right into the pedestrian
Pedestrian - while in the right, could have done better to not be a total dipshit and stepped aside
Pedestrian - while in the right, could have done better to not be a total dipshit and stepped aside
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:55 pm to tiggerthetooth
cyclists think they have the right of way against cars and also against pedestrians. add to it that this retard had two dogs as well, taking up over half of the trail...definitely the cyclist was in the wrong.
that said, the pedestrian could have jsut stepped off the road and avoided the whole thing, which is what i would have done and have done many times. not worth it.
that said, the pedestrian could have jsut stepped off the road and avoided the whole thing, which is what i would have done and have done many times. not worth it.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:55 pm to tiggerthetooth
quote:
Who was in the wrong here? (Cyclist vs pedestrian)
Cyclist.
Every time.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:56 pm to tiggerthetooth
Cyclist always yield to pedestrians.
This post was edited on 1/17/24 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:56 pm to theantiquetiger
Cyclist should’ve been on the right.
Posted on 1/17/24 at 2:57 pm to theantiquetiger
quote:
The walker because she could have just sidestepped to the left 3 feet. The cyclist had two dogs, and her hands full.
The Walker was a count, even called it early, “I’m not moving!”
It’s called common courtesy
Know how I know you drive 50 in the left lane?
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News