- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NY Times Opinion Piece: Exxon Mobil’s Pioneer Acquisition Is a Direct Threat to Democracy
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:25 am
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:25 am
quote:
Last week, Exxon Mobil agreed to buy Pioneer Natural Resources for $59.5 billion, in a move widely expected to set off a wave of consolidation throughout the oil sector. Combined, Exxon and Pioneer would be the largest producer of oil and natural gas in the Permian Basin, the field that produces more than 40 percent of America’s oil. If the deal goes through, other companies like Chevron could soon follow suit, buying up smaller companies as they come under pressure from investors to match Exxon’s size.
That consolidation would undermine democracy in the United States, mislead investors and weaken market competition. It should be stopped for all our sakes.
The democratic argument against the proposed deal is simple. In politics, concentrated interests, like rich corporations, have powerful advantages over diffuse interests, like voters, that can distort outcomes and thwart progress. Take climate legislation. A majority of Americans want to see the environment protected, but big companies that pollute heavily have an interest in watering down legislation that might reduce their profits. As a result, progress on energy policy has been agonizingly slow.
Exxon has also taken steps to shape the way voters think about the environment by sowing public misinformation and funding conservative groups disguised as grass-roots organizations.
quote:
Allowing Big Oil to become Bigger Oil means more money for this kind of research, plus more money for lobbyists, industry interest groups and media advertising, all of which undermines efforts to pass legislation strong enough to meet the world’s climate goals. The cumulative effect of it all on democracy would be so significant that regulators ought to be paying close attention.
A second reason for concern is the yawning gap between what Exxon says to investors and what it actually does. The company said as recently as August that it continues to support the Paris climate agreement. But it also said that the world isn’t on track to reach the targets of the agreement. The Pioneer deal not only seems to be a huge bet to take advantage of that expected failure; it is also a commitment to contribute to the failure.
quote:
Authorities should also be concerned because the proposed deal could hurt Americans economically. Larger, consolidated oil companies have incentives to restrain production, restricting supply to artificially sustain high prices. Higher oil prices would mean higher gasoline prices at the pump — a classic antitrust concern.
quote:
Even with these clear democratic and economic concerns, the legal path to blocking the deal could be difficult. In recent decades, the courts have not taken kindly to antitrust cases rooted in environmental or democratic arguments. But there are, nonetheless, a number of avenues open to regulators.
quote:
The Securities and Exchange Commission should consider whether Exxon has misled its investors with regard to climate change. And Congress could also hold hearings on the proposed deal. If legislators want to build the political momentum required to enact the policies the United States needs to cut its emissions meaningfully, then it will be essential to expose the oil companies’ lack of credibility on this issue and to curtail their overwhelming political influence.
It didn’t have to be this way. If Exxon were serious about preventing climate change, it could use its record $56 billion in net income from last year to invest more seriously in renewable energy, carbon capture and storage or other technologies that are compatible with long-term environmental sustainability. The Federal Trade Commission would surely allow Exxon to acquire a major solar company, for instance.
There’s nothing wrong with wanting to turn a greater profit, but there are more ways than one for a company as large and powerful as Exxon to do so. By doubling down on fossil fuels, it’s choosing the way most harmful to the rest of us. Now it falls to the government to protect its people from corporate self-interest that’s detrimental to democracy and the global environment. This deal endangers the world, and it should be stopped.
quote:
By Jeff D. Colgan
Dr. Colgan is a professor of political science and the director of the Climate Solutions Lab at Brown University.
LINK
Of course this “expert’s” job is a college political science professor at a university that’s charging undergrads and/or their parents a 65k per year tuition bill. $260k in just tuition alone if one graduates in four years.
And Congress should hold hearings on this?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:26 am to ragincajun03
quote:
That consolidation would undermine democracy in the United States, mislead investors and weaken market competition. It should be stopped for all our sakes.
Yep, companies this size should be forced to break into smaller pieces, not merge into larger ones.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:29 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Larger, consolidated oil companies have incentives to restrain production, restricting supply to artificially sustain high prices.
This is the only sentence in the entire piece that's even somewhat true.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:30 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Take climate legislation. A majority of Americans want to see the environment protected
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:30 am to ragincajun03
quote:
That consolidation would undermine democracy in the United States, mislead investors and weaken market competition. It should be stopped for all our sakes.
Yup...uh-huh.
LINK
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:31 am to ragincajun03
Why are you wasting your time reading NYT opinion pieces?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:33 am to LSUBFA83
quote:
Why are you wasting your time reading NYT opinion pieces?
To learn about the next piece of bullshite they are going to foist on us?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:33 am to ragincajun03
Google, Microsoft, facebook, Apple ?
Are they a threat to a Constitutional Republic ?
Are they a threat to a Constitutional Republic ?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:35 am to ragincajun03
This Weimar shite is how you get you-know-who.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:36 am to ragincajun03
quote:
undermine democracy
They must all use the same Magic 8-Ball for their talking points.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:36 am to LSUBFA83
quote:
Why are you wasting your time reading NYT opinion pieces?
David Blackmon discussed it in one of his recent articles, so I wanted to read it to know exactly what he was talking about.
It also doesn’t hurt to actually read/listen to exactly what opposing views are espousing, rather than just taking Tucker Carlson or Gateway Pundit’s word for it.
This post was edited on 10/19/23 at 8:40 am
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:37 am to Kingpenm3
Our massive bloated federal govt is what is undermining our democratic republic
This post was edited on 10/19/23 at 8:37 am
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:37 am to ragincajun03
quote:Did the left react like this to Google?
In politics, concentrated interests, like rich corporations, have powerful advantages over diffuse interests, like voters, that can distort outcomes and thwart progress
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:40 am to ragincajun03
This entire article made me lol
How do people like this take themselves seriously?
How do people like this take themselves seriously?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:40 am to ragincajun03
Everyday I’m reminded more and more how absolutely, undeniably correct McCarthy was all along. Shoulda have nuked Russia off the map after WWII.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:43 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Exxon has also taken steps to shape the way voters think about the environment by sowing public misinformation and funding conservative groups disguised as grass-roots organizations.
Like democrats and ACORN?
The hypocrisy of the political class in this country is truly astounding.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:44 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Larger, consolidated oil companies have incentives to restrain production, restricting supply to artificially sustain high prices.
Like an oil cartel?
Large oil companies don’t want to engage in the primary activity that is necessary to produce revenue?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:48 am to Tantal
quote:
quote:
Larger, consolidated oil companies have incentives to restrain production, restricting supply to artificially sustain high prices.
This is the only sentence in the entire piece that's even somewhat true.
Maybe, but over the last few years, the WH policies have done a fine job at restricting supply to inflate prices for the oil companies.
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:54 am to ragincajun03
Do liberals even know what democracy means?
Posted on 10/19/23 at 8:57 am to ragincajun03
The left has never figured out that their energy policies are awesome for the bigger players/companies in the oil industry... not so much for the medium and smaller companies. Or the American people.
Or maybe they have? hmmmmm....
Or maybe they have? hmmmmm....
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News