Started By
Message
locked post

Freedom of Worship

Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:45 pm
Posted by Maverick6587
Member since Aug 2021
2 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:45 pm
How are there 184,000 people in the State of Louisiana that went and voted that they don’t believe in the freedom to worship being a fundamental human right?
Posted by DiamondDog
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2019
12879 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:46 pm to
Democrats
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35912 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:46 pm to
I voted against it because it’s redundant and pointless. Freedom of worship is already enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.
Posted by Chef Curry
Member since Mar 2019
2999 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:47 pm to
Democrats
Posted by JS87
Member since Aug 2010
17648 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:47 pm to
Western and northern white liberal transplants
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
30391 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:49 pm to
It’s in the US Constitution and already protected.
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
30391 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Constitution is just a sheet of paper it’s as good as the people honoring it. Not going very well right now

No different than this amendment.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
86110 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 9:54 pm to
Seems like a large number but small percent, 10% is avg according to Google, which is probably where you’re around. 184k of 4.6 is 4%, then remove under 18 and those who didn’t vote.
Posted by Tower_Tiger12
Member since Jan 2021
1163 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:00 pm to
Because it’s already protected by the Constitution as a fundamental right. The term “House of Worship” only creates another loophole for manipulation in the future
This post was edited on 10/14/23 at 10:00 pm
Posted by yakster
Member since Mar 2021
3652 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:07 pm to
Because during Covid some governors shut down church gatherings. While allowing bars and other businesses to remain open.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
70198 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

I voted against it because it’s redundant and pointless. Freedom of worship is already enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.


Yeah?

Why did churches get shut down during covid?

This ammendment prevents that horseshite
Posted by Socrates Johnson
Madisonville
Member since Apr 2012
2362 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:30 pm to
I assume that means that there are 184,000 that understand our current protections. Should be more concerned about the inverse that thinks this is necessary.
Posted by midnight_chopper
Member since Mar 2018
718 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

I assume that means that there are 184,000 that understand our current protections. Should be more concerned about the inverse that thinks this is necessary.


How did the current protections work out during COVID?
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27052 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

Freedom of worship is already enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.


Not with this clarity.

Do you remember all the houses of worship closing down during Covid?

You just ousted yourself as one of the individuals the OP mentioned.

Thanks.
Posted by White Bear
Deer-Thirty
Member since Jul 2014
17280 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

Why did churches get shut down during covid? This ammendment prevents that horseshite
It will not.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103189 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

Freedom of worship is already enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.


Explain that to the inbred sloth who is leaving the mansion in January.
Posted by GusAU
Member since Mar 2014
4942 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

I voted against it because it’s redundant and pointless. Freedom of worship is already enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.

Damn....what a moronic idiot you've just proven to be to everyone on this board.

This post was edited on 10/14/23 at 10:49 pm
Posted by Socrates Johnson
Madisonville
Member since Apr 2012
2362 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:49 pm to
Well, the challenge of the shutdown was successful, and it would presumably remain so. This is big, redundant government.
Are you one of those people that is against big government, but only when its bigness is against your beliefs?
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3441 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

It’s in the US Constitution and already protected.


It’s still good for more protection even at the state level.

Look at California, Illinois, NY, and others. We have the second amendment, but the citizens in those states practically do not enjoy the fundamental right to keep and bear arms.
Posted by midnight_chopper
Member since Mar 2018
718 posts
Posted on 10/14/23 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

Well, the challenge of the shutdown was successful, and it would presumably remain so. This is big, redundant government. Are you one of those people that is against big government, but only when its bigness is against your beliefs?


The fact that there was even a need to challenge means that it apparently wasn’t clear enough. As for big government, at least this went through a freaking amendment process to be voted in by the people as opposed to executive fiat that prompted the need for the amendment in the first place.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram