- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Freedom of Worship
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:00 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:00 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I voted against it because it’s redundant and pointless. Freedom of worship is already enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.
Same honestly. The fact that this is even on the ballot as an amendment is a telling sign why amendments that target improving the economics and infrastructure for the state aren’t listed.
0
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:04 pm to GusAU
I have no problem with the downvotes if someone can explain to me why voting for it is redundant and pointless. What negative would come from voting for it…even if it is redundant?
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:05 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I voted against it because it’s redundant and pointless. Freedom of worship is already enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.
And yet your governor decided that it wasn’t because “public health emergency “
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:09 pm to GusAU
quote:
What negative would come from voting for it…even if it is redundant?
To me, it’s not that it’s a negative about a person voting ‘for’ the amendment. It’s more irrelevant whether it’s amended or not for this addition
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:10 pm to elprez00
quote:
And yet your governor decided that it wasn’t because “public health emergency “
Challenged in court and the court agreed. You have the precedent already
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:11 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I voted against it because it’s redundant and pointless. Freedom of worship is already enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.
Didnt seem to slow down the libtard governors during covid, now did it?
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:11 pm to RobbBobb
Again, it was challenged and succeeded. The law agrees for future occurrences (hopefully never again)
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:12 pm to midnight_chopper
quote:
The fact that there was even a need to challenge means that it apparently wasn’t clear enough. As for big government, at least this went through a freaking amendment process to be voted in by the people as opposed to executive fiat that prompted the need for the amendment in the first place.
This doesn’t stop someone from making the exact same executive order, dumbass. Said EO would still be challenged to the courts that would then decide the exact same way as they did with the pre-existing laws. This is exactly redundant.
Posted on 10/14/23 at 11:40 pm to Socrates Johnson
Come to think of it, we really should pass a law to outlaw double murder.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 12:05 am to Socrates Johnson
quote:
This doesn’t stop someone from making the exact same executive order, dumbass. Said EO would still be challenged to the courts that would then decide the exact same way as they did with the pre-existing laws. This is exactly redundant.
Were you as vocally angry about the executive overreach as you are over the redundant law that addressed the executive overreach?
Posted on 10/15/23 at 12:19 am to midnight_chopper
THIS LAW DOESN’T ADDRESS THE EXECUTIVE OVERREACH!
Your problem is with the executive overreach, as is mine. This doesn’t address that, ergo it’s a no vote. We’ve further amended an already bloated constitution.
Your problem is with the executive overreach, as is mine. This doesn’t address that, ergo it’s a no vote. We’ve further amended an already bloated constitution.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 12:28 am to Maverick6587
Has to be ignorance, just try to talk to these people they talk out both sides of their mouth, it’s pretty wild.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 5:44 am to Maverick6587
That's insane if true.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 6:09 am to elprez00
quote:
And yet your governor decided that it wasn’t because “public health emergency “
And the courts ruled against that decision on the basis of already existing protections.
This post was edited on 10/15/23 at 6:10 am
Posted on 10/15/23 at 8:18 am to Indefatigable
I voted against it because it’s redundant and pointless. Freedom of worship is already enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.[/quote]
"I am for it, that's why I voted against it..."
quote:
IndafagetAhole
"I am for it, that's why I voted against it..."
Posted on 10/15/23 at 11:15 am to MasterDigger
You must not have been around during Covid when pastors were being arrested for exercising their freedom of worship. This amendment keeps a-holes like JBE from again shuttering churches during so-called “emergencies.”
Posted on 10/15/23 at 11:17 am to Maverick6587
Heathens
Posted on 10/15/23 at 11:19 am to Maverick6587
We can only guess which slot they fit in.
Posted on 10/15/23 at 11:29 am to DiamondDog
quote:
Democrats
Trash is gonna trash…
Posted on 10/15/23 at 1:17 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
This amendment keeps a-holes like JBE from again shuttering churches during so-called “emergencies.”
No more than the First Amendment already does. This was a virtue signal from the legislature who needed to be focusing on real issues like crime, economic issues, and infrastructure.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News