Jim Caviezel wants you to stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein

I listened to that 7 times, jc, and can't determine what either your or Caviezel's assumed implication is? "Up against", what do you think he means, since your OP makes an assumption?

Sound of Freedom is being advertised as a true story, do you have some inside baseball info to refute the claim of Caviezel, Ballard and the director?

Jim Caviezel does not want you to stop talking about Jeffrey Epstein. What Caviezel realized was the audience reaction to a particular sequence of events that made them think also of Epstein's Island.

Heck, after seeing the Movie Sound of Freedom, I am particularly upset with WHY NONE of Epstein clients who abused so many of Epstein's trafficked girls have been arrested.

Caviezel prays you talk about what Epstein did!! He really hopes you get angry none of Epstein's clients have paid a price at all.

For the record, I believe that the current Trans Movement - as marketed to children via public schools - IS child abuse. And a form of genetic/cultural/psychological dysfunction, if not pure Pagan Evil. Given all the public support for overt pedophilia, it's ludicrous to believe that evil marketeers won't fill the obvious demand for top dollar.

You must have included the wrong link. The video in the link you have in your post doesn't show Caviezal indicating a desire for people to stop talking about Epstein.

He is talking about the fact that in Vegas during 5 different screenings (during the screening) in the same spot of the movie people started talking about something.

When he asked the audience what was causing the discussion they said "Epstein's Island" as in that point in the movie either made them think of Epstein's Island or perhaps showed the island. He was using "up against" as in good (exposing groomers & pedos) vs evil (Epstien's Island).

Definitely not saying people shouldn't talk about it.

Epstein didn't do anything, there were apparently no customers to traffic young girls to