- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:38 pm to wutangfinancial
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:38 pm to wutangfinancial
I wonder if NurseCovidKaren will copy off his paper like in the movie board.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:38 pm to wutangfinancial
I specifically responded to one post to correct it.
The biggest problem with discussing this issue is how words are used, b/c they're often used dishonestly (and then a doubling down of shame-based responses to try to stop people from weeding out the truth).
That's why I responded specifically to that link, b/c it while the report is talking about giving minor's the legal authority to consent to sex, it's never stated that this was for partners of the age of majority and, further, it's heavily implied this is about minor:minor sex.
But, since it says those words, dishonest actors run with a narrative that fits in with a worldview and voila.
The biggest problem with discussing this issue is how words are used, b/c they're often used dishonestly (and then a doubling down of shame-based responses to try to stop people from weeding out the truth).
That's why I responded specifically to that link, b/c it while the report is talking about giving minor's the legal authority to consent to sex, it's never stated that this was for partners of the age of majority and, further, it's heavily implied this is about minor:minor sex.
But, since it says those words, dishonest actors run with a narrative that fits in with a worldview and voila.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
You should get a job with Snopes or FactCheckDotOrg. Maybe even join the old #AttackWatch?
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:41 pm to Corso
quote:
Why not just say yes this is going on, everybody knows it is, and we've got to stop it.
Because dishonest arguments are used to inflate the impact of this activity, especially domestically. To tie it into the OP, is anyone disputing that the Q stuff did not rely heavily on allegations of powerful people trafficking minors for sex?
quote:
Why dismiss it as Q-Anon paranoia
Why did Q-Anon paranoia dishonestly amplify this issue and lie about it? That goes both ways.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 1:42 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
You should get a job with Snopes or FactCheckDotOrg. Maybe even join the old #AttackWatch?
Why? I'm more of an independent, grassroots kind of guy.
For example, would you feel stupid parroting an argument that was a compete lie? I mean after the fact, when your ignorance was shown to you?
This post was edited on 7/7/23 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why did Q-Anon paranoia dishonestly amplify this issue and lie about it? That goes both ways.
Was Q-Anon mentioned in the movie? If it wasn't then it's irrelevant and this author is just slapping labels on it like the media always does
Posted on 7/7/23 at 6:51 pm to stout
Is Charles Bramesco pedo adjacent?
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:09 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
5400 pages of rambling fiction from Bama posters....damn I miss the Q thread
This is why you are groomers.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:11 pm to stout
quote:
Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
The people who think this are the same ones wanting kids to be indoctrinated in cross-dressing homosexual fetishism.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Because dishonest arguments are used to inflate the impact of this activity, especially domestically. To tie it into the OP, is anyone disputing that the Q stuff did not rely heavily on allegations of powerful people trafficking minors for sex?
Because a rich dude died in prison having been arrested for sex trafficking and now his confidant is in jail.
And the entire anti trump crowd uses Epstein's ties to Trump as Tump bad.
So… it’s not just a Q thing.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:14 pm to stout
It would be nice if movie reviews would focus on telling us if a movie is good or not
But the “Q was right! We’re so smart!” / “Hollywood deep state pedos gonna kill Mel Gibson and Jim Caviezel cuz of this movie!” threads around here kinda frick up the whole “why are they going there?” argument
Looks to me like a Zero Dark 30 type flick, but centered around a mission to save a sex trafficked kid. The retards here made me think it was just another 3000 Mules-type bullshite propaganda movie
But the “Q was right! We’re so smart!” / “Hollywood deep state pedos gonna kill Mel Gibson and Jim Caviezel cuz of this movie!” threads around here kinda frick up the whole “why are they going there?” argument
Looks to me like a Zero Dark 30 type flick, but centered around a mission to save a sex trafficked kid. The retards here made me think it was just another 3000 Mules-type bullshite propaganda movie
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:21 pm to MrFreakinMiyagi
quote:
But the “Q was right! We’re so smart!” / “Hollywood deep state pedos gonna kill Mel Gibson and Jim Caviezel cuz of this movie!” threads around here kinda frick up the whole “why are they going there?” argument
This isn't the Movie/TV board, guy.
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:25 pm to stout
quote:
This isn't the Movie/TV board, guy.
Those threads weren’t on the MTV board, buddy
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:26 pm to MrFreakinMiyagi
quote:
Those threads weren’t on the MTV board, buddy
I guess I am missing your point. Apologies
This post was edited on 7/7/23 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
So you’re here to play hall monitor and deflect for pedophiles? Can’t say that I’m surprised, all of you groomers are the same
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:36 pm to stout
MAPS belong on a wall. Preferably nailed & hung up high.
This post was edited on 7/7/23 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:37 pm to stout
Paranoid huh
its so paranoid they reported in it 5 years ago
What changed besides pedo in chief?
its so paranoid they reported in it 5 years ago
What changed besides pedo in chief?
This post was edited on 7/7/23 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's why I responded specifically to that link, b/c it while the report is talking about giving minor's the legal authority to consent to sex, it's never stated that this was for partners of the age of majority and, further, it's heavily implied this is about minor:minor sex. [
But, since it says those words, dishonest actors run with a narrative that fits in with a worldview and voila.
It is not “dishonest” to note that the ICJ report also made no distinction between prepubescent children and sexually mature teenagers. An 18 year old “seducing” a 10 year old is a predatory sex act. Yet as usual, you are once again exhibiting the very behavior you criticize in others.
This post was edited on 7/7/23 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 7/7/23 at 7:38 pm to stout
That author definitely is a pedophile
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News