- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DOJ asks Judge to silence Trump
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:17 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:17 am to AggieHank86
They can’t comment into “ongoing investigations”. Or any prior investigation…. Unless they leak or lie to congress or take classified materials themselves or set process traps or leak to the press like a sieve or issue false memos to the media to protect politicians they favor or try to justify refusal to prosecute actual crimes.
0
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:18 am to TrueTiger
quote:Good Lord, you are histrionic.
Gov: we are going to jail you
Citizen: Let's see your evidence.
Gov: no, that's a secret
He GETS the evidence, and he can use it to defend himself in court. He just cannot start trying the case in the media and poisoning the jury pool.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:19 am to Bunk Moreland
quote:
Right, the government has no accountability because they can just cover up everything under the auspices of national security, protecting sources and methods, or ongoing investigation.
Yes.
Also, ignoring the various "Police state" issues involved in this discussion, a major artery of discussion SHOULD be on the bullshite classified status and how easy it is. It's usually used to protect inept governmental officials or frickups so we can't see.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:19 am to AggieHank86
I have no issue with that. I think people just don’t trust the feds to do the same. To not to leak and spin narratives in the media to taint this case. Do you?
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Trump gets to see the evidence, though.
In a case involving a presidential candidate and former president at this level of national importance, the public needs to see it.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:28 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Is the DoJ tweeting about Trump 16 times per day?
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:31 am to AggieHank86
quote:That tactic is reserved for the DOJ and selective leaks to a supportive MSM.
He just cannot start trying the case in the media and poisoning the jury pool.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:32 am to SlowFlowPro
Agree. But I'm wondering if this is Jack Smith laying a potential trap os the judge to get her removed.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:32 am to Jjdoc
A decent judge would deny their request since the government intentionally leaks these sorts of details on their own. But, our judiciary is broken.
It's stunning that the judiciary is so spineless.
It's stunning that the judiciary is so spineless.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He can still talk. Stop being so histrionic. He just can't discuss certain evidence of the case, which he couldn't anyway because most of it is classified
It appears nearly every government document is classified. Tucker reported there are currently 1 billion government documents labeled as classified.
This ^^^^ is how the Bureaucratic State controls government documents if the need arises to begin a cleanup operation.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:37 am to blueboxer1119
Remember when the leftists went apeshit after Trump's famous phone call to Ukraine? They said going after a political rival hurts our democracy.
Remember?
Remember?
Remember?
Remember?
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:37 am to Jjdoc
I wonder what the DOJs response would be if Trumps team asks what the penalty will be when the media drops "per anonymous sauces" tidbits.
Or will he not be able to respond to anything that "hits" the news cycle via sauces?
Or will he not be able to respond to anything that "hits" the news cycle via sauces?
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:39 am to POTUS2024
quote:
It's stunning that the judiciary is so spineless.
They’re not spineless.
It’s a rigged game. They’re all working together on the same side.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:40 am to Bass Tiger
because if made public it would be damaging to the dems/deep staters no doubt,
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:45 am to Jjdoc
I don't think the proposed protective order is opposed by Trump or Nauta.
What else can we get upset about today?
What else can we get upset about today?
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:45 am to Decatur
The simp has arrived.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:46 am to AggieHank86
You are such a salty bitch.
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:46 am to Jjdoc
And Jack Smith can leak to the media as he sees fit.
Wake up America!!
Wake up America!!
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:47 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Agree. But I'm wondering if this is Jack Smith laying a potential trap os the judge to get her removed
No doubt will be tried, but as long as the judge is stern and says "no" then it really can only cause more delays.
They need the trial to start/end in the Trump nominee summer/fall 24 window or really won't matter. He'll either be President to pardon himself or loses and no longer a threat, so they'll want to save face to try to say in the future that political persecution isnt good for "mUh democracy".
This really is going to be tough to get in the window they want so they can't afford adding more time.
All IMO of course....
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:50 am to AggieHank86
quote:
along with any information derived therefrom,
Two illiterate lawyers. You would think that would be a hamstring for the legal profession. Guess not.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News