- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Travis Kelce says Chiefs dynasty will surpass Golden State Warriors dynasty
Posted on 6/5/23 at 8:21 pm
Posted on 6/5/23 at 8:21 pm
quote:
Travis Kelce believes that when it's all said and done, Patrick Mahomes will win more championships than Steph Curry and Klay Thompson.
The Kansas City Chiefs tight end joined FanDuelTV's "Run it Back," where he was asked if he considers the Chiefs a dynasty after Kansas City's two Super Bowl wins in three appearances and how they stack up with the Warriors.
"I would say, yeah, Kansas City has been a dynasty for quite a while now," Kelce said. "Obviously, I'm biased to that, but what coach [Andy] Reid has done since he's been here, in terms of winning, in terms of playoff runs and all the division championships and the AFC title appearances, then obviously the Super Bowls.
"We're 100 percent a dynasty, but when you put it up against what the Warriors have done, obviously we don't have as many championships right now, so we've got some work to do. We're on an uphill battle. Especially when you talk about what the Warriors have been able to do. Unfortunately, I've seen quite a few daggers from the Golden State Warriors being a Cavs fan throughout my day."
"I think by the end of the day, Patty Mahomes finds a way to get more than four championships," Kelce adds. "Hopefully I'm still along for the ride by the time he gets there."
LINK
Posted on 6/5/23 at 8:24 pm to Bench McElroy
Who’s going to call him out in 10 years when his predictions fall way short?
Posted on 6/5/23 at 8:26 pm to Bench McElroy
Probably won’t win another one
Posted on 6/5/23 at 8:33 pm to TheWalrus
Damn bengals fans are MAD in here for no reason.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 8:36 pm to father2sons
They should win one more. But I don’t think they are even a dynasty right now.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 8:41 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
Probably won’t win another one
They'll win one more and at least play for another.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 8:41 pm to dukke v
2 in 3 years is borderline.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 8:53 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
Ok. But the AFC is loaded with good teams. It will be hard but if they win another I’d consider it.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 9:30 pm to Bench McElroy
Not sure they are a dynasty.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 9:34 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
quote:
2 in 3 years is borderline.
Well they didn’t win 2 in 3 years.
They’ve won 2 in 4. Appeared in 3 in that time span.
I would say they need to win 1 more in the next 2 years. 3 championships and 4 appearances in 6 years would be a dynasty.
This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 6/5/23 at 9:50 pm to Weagle25
He's right they have some work to do. Hopefully Kelce plays at least another 3 or 4 years. He's been pretty healthy so far in his career. What I'd like to see is the Chiefs to draft Brock Bowers next year so he can learn from Kelce before taking over.
This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:04 pm to bcoop199
Chiefs gonna tank to get him?
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:09 pm to bcoop199
quote:
What I'd like to see is the Chiefs to draft Brock Bowers next year so he can learn from Kelce before taking over.
They had better trade up into the top 5. I'd take him over Kyle Pitts in the NFL right now. Hell, Bowers could probably throw himself 3 TDs in 2 years.
This post was edited on 6/5/23 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:10 pm to Bench McElroy
Travis Kelce is a Big Time Douche
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:13 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Travis Kelce
Is annoying as frick
Posted on 6/5/23 at 10:21 pm to ReauxlTide222
I said I'd like to see it.lol They'd have to trade up a lot to get him.
Posted on 6/5/23 at 11:59 pm to bcoop199
They had their hands full with the eagles. I wouldn't say they're they're on the 2000s Patriots level.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 12:08 am to The Cool No 9
And if they played on a decent field where you had even basic traction, the Eagles win by two touchdowns. Their pass rush would have decimated Kansas City offense and Mahoney would have been picking himself off his arse all day.
Eagles were clearly the better team. It took referees in three conservative games to assist the Chiefs to “win” the Super Bowl.
It’s all controlled and contrived.
Downvote KC fans. Upvote Eagles and NFL fans, because you know I am 100% right. I’ve never been wrong.
Eagles were clearly the better team. It took referees in three conservative games to assist the Chiefs to “win” the Super Bowl.
It’s all controlled and contrived.
Downvote KC fans. Upvote Eagles and NFL fans, because you know I am 100% right. I’ve never been wrong.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 1:29 am to The Cool No 9
quote:
They had their hands full with the eagles. I wouldn't say they're they're on the 2000s Patriots level.
The Pats won their first 3 Super Bowls by a total of 9 points and still only have one win by more than a score, 10 pts against the Rams.
Posted on 6/6/23 at 2:19 am to Bench McElroy
Idk if you can consider yourself a dynasty when your last Super Bowl win consisted of consistently outrageous officiating in the AFC Ship, a big controversial call in the Super Bowl, and the Super Bowl being played on turf that mirrored a slip and slide.
Popular
Back to top
