- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Liberal Professor claims there is no difference between male and female bones
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:36 am
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:36 am
quote:
A University of Pittsburgh classroom erupted with laughter after a professor argued with swimmer Riley Gaines that an archeologist cannot discern whether a person was male or female by examining their bones
quote:
A video went viral of a confrontation during the Leadership Institute event when Gaines asked senior lecturer at the school’s anthropology department Gabby Yearwood, "If you were to dig up two humans one hundred years from now, both man and woman, could you tell the difference, strictly off of bones?" "No!" the professor replied as the room erupted in laughter.
quote:
The professor then responded to the laughter with shock, wondering how he could be doubted when he was "the expert in the room." "Have any of you been to anthropological sites? Have any of you studied biological anthropology? I’m just saying, I’ve got over 150 years of data, I’m just curious as to why I’m being laughed at," he said before later declaring, "I have a PhD!"
Article link
Link to mentally ill professor
Btw, DIBS on my girl Riley Gaines
This post was edited on 3/31/23 at 10:57 am
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:38 am to ArmyHogs
I'm going to assume in this sick person's head, he meant that we couldn't know their gender identity, therefore couldn't tell the gender from bones.
What a kook
What a kook
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:42 am to ArmyHogs
Democrats are believers is anti positivism. Its absolutely the key to understanding communists and progressives.
LINK
They realize their shite isn't scientific. It explains why progressives can believe totally insane shite.
They literally make shite up and it becomes their reality, science be damned.
LINK
They realize their shite isn't scientific. It explains why progressives can believe totally insane shite.
quote:
In social science, antipositivism (also interpretivism, negativism or antinaturalism) is a theoretical stance that proposes that the social realm cannot be studied with the methods of investigation utilized within the natural sciences, and that investigation of the social realm requires a different epistemology. Fundamental to that antipositivist epistemology is the belief that the concepts and language that researchers use in their research shape their perceptions of the social world they are investigating and defining.[1]
They literally make shite up and it becomes their reality, science be damned.
This post was edited on 3/31/23 at 10:43 am
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:43 am to ArmyHogs
I didnt read this but I assume this is not a biology professor. It's quite easy to tell, pelvis is an easy giveaway.
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:45 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They literally make shite up and it becomes their reality, science be damned.
& they just keep telling us the emporer got another addition to his wardrobe
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:50 am to ShoeBang
quote:
Positivism resulted from foundationalism and empiricism; positivists value objectivity and proving or disproving hypotheses. Interpretivism is in direct opposition to positivism; it originated from principles developed by Kant and values subjectivity. Critical theory originated in the Frankfurt School and considers the wider oppressive nature of politics or societal influences, and often includes feminist research.
Anti positivism is the marxist way of explaining things that can otherwise be seen as insane.
It doesn't make sense, its anti scientific, but they love it because it can be interpreted any way they see fit.
The social world Democrats believe exists is nothing but a fairy tale interpreted by socially backward academics.
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:52 am to ArmyHogs
Bio of the professor: He is a socio-cultural anthropologist earning his Ph.D from the University of Texas at Austin in Anthropology focusing in Black Diaspora Studies and Masculinity. His research interests include the social constructions of race and racism, masculinity, gender, sex, Black Feminist and Black Queer theory, anthropology of sport and Black Diaspora. Dr. Yearwood holds a secondary appointment with the Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies Program at Pitt. Dr. Yearwood is also a teaching member of the Pitt Prison Education Project
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:56 am to ArmyHogs
quote:
school’s anthropology department Gabby Yearwood, "If you were to dig up two humans one hundred years from now, both man and woman, could you tell the difference, strictly off of bones?" "No!" the professor replied as the room erupted in laughter.
quote:School should be embarrassed and ashamed they ever employed this person. And they owe students an apology (refund?) for exposing them to someone this ignorant.
University of Pittsburgh
Posted on 3/31/23 at 10:56 am to LEASTBAY
quote:
I didnt read this but I assume this is not a biology professor. It's quite easy to tell, pelvis is an easy giveaway.
Yep...sciatic notch is dead giveaway. Or, you can look at the mastoid process if you only have a skull.
Posted on 3/31/23 at 11:01 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They literally make shite up and it becomes their reality, science be damned
And nobody does anything about it
Posted on 3/31/23 at 11:18 am to ArmyHogs
quote:
Liberal Professor claims there is no difference between male and female bones
Guess that forensic anthropologists have been wrong all these years!
Posted on 3/31/23 at 11:21 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They realize their shite isn't scientific.
A lot of the shite academics spew isn't scientific, but it's what the reptiles giving them their grants and donations want and it's been proven repetitively that the "newthink" machine can quickly "prove" up is really down and if you don't think so, you're a white supremacist.
Posted on 3/31/23 at 12:01 pm to ArmyHogs
quote:
Bio of the professor: He is a socio-cultural anthropologist earning his Ph.D from the University of Texas at Austin in Anthropology focusing in Black Diaspora Studies and Masculinity. His research interests include the social constructions of race and racism, masculinity, gender, sex, Black Feminist and Black Queer theory, anthropology of sport and Black Diaspora. Dr. Yearwood holds a secondary appointment with the Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies Program at Pitt. Dr. Yearwood is also a teaching member of the Pitt Prison Education Project
That's a lot of qualifiers for him to say he places the subjectivity of race and masculinity over that of objective science.
The real difference is between pelvic bones.
:science,bitch.gif:
Posted on 3/31/23 at 12:55 pm to ArmyHogs
quote:
Have any of you been to anthropological sites? Have any of you studied biological anthropology? I’m just saying, I’ve got over 150 years of data, I’m just curious as to why I’m being laughed at," he said before later declaring, "I have a PhD!"

Posted on 3/31/23 at 12:56 pm to ArmyHogs
If you're dead, are you male or female? Don't think it matters.
Posted on 3/31/23 at 1:03 pm to ArmyHogs
Well, for starters pelvic bones. Women have to deliver children,nature provides the means through how a woman's pelvic bone is "designed"
Posted on 3/31/23 at 1:05 pm to ArmyHogs
I think there is at least one bone that could be examined to make that determination…
Posted on 3/31/23 at 1:06 pm to ArmyHogs
quote:
Liberal Professor
A common denominator often seen when reading a batshite crazy story.
Posted on 3/31/23 at 1:06 pm to Bard
So, there are differences in bone structures to allow for pregnancy and then birthing babies.
But, I was told that men could have babies.
Who knew?
Most sane people.
Posted on 3/31/23 at 1:22 pm to ArmyHogs
The loony professor, Gabby M H Yearwood, is the Managing Faculty Director, Center for Civil Rights and Racial Justice
I wonder how blacks feel about being co-opted by the trans movement
bio for professor trans propagandist
And there's more. HIs PhD is in socio-cultural anthropology, meaning he doesn't know shite about paleontology.
He also focuses on the "black diaspora and masculinity." Translation: He's on the DL and gets to look at pics of naked men and call it "research"
I wonder how blacks feel about being co-opted by the trans movement
bio for professor trans propagandist
And there's more. HIs PhD is in socio-cultural anthropology, meaning he doesn't know shite about paleontology.
He also focuses on the "black diaspora and masculinity." Translation: He's on the DL and gets to look at pics of naked men and call it "research"
quote:
He is a socio-cultural anthropologist earning his Ph.D from the University of Texas at Austin in Anthropology focusing in Black Diaspora Studies and Masculinity.
This post was edited on 3/31/23 at 1:25 pm
Popular
Back to top

16












