- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: With the Republic in Peril, DeSantis’ Response to Potential Trump arrest falls flat
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:02 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:02 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Just because you want dumb things (and it may reflect poorly on you) doesn't mean doing dumb things is +EV.
You also do realize that Trump would need to be incarcerated while this extradition process worked itself out, right?
Here is the Florida statute:
It's a one-step process for Trump in this hypothetical, with a binary answer:
1. Is there a valid indictment from New York?
If yes, then Florida has to issue an arrest warrant in Florida for Trump.
If no, then Florida doesn't have to issue an arrest warrant in Florida for Trump.
You also do realize that Trump would need to be incarcerated while this extradition process worked itself out, right?
Here is the Florida statute:
quote:
941.03 Form of demand.—No demand for the extradition of a person charged with crime in another state shall be recognized by the Governor unless in writing alleging, except in cases arising under s. 941.06, that the accused was present in the demanding state at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, and that thereafter he or she fled from the state, and accompanied by an authenticated copy of an indictment found or by information supported by affidavit in the state having jurisdiction of the crime, or by a copy of a warrant supported by an affidavit made before a committing magistrate of the demanding state; or by a copy of a judgment of conviction or of a sentence imposed in execution thereof, together with a statement by the executive authority of the demanding state that the person claimed has escaped from confinement or has broken the terms of his or her bail, probation, or parole. The indictment, information, or affidavit made before the magistrate must substantially charge the person demanded with having committed a crime under the law of that state; and the copy of indictment, information, affidavit, judgment of conviction, or sentence must be authenticated by the executive authority making the demand.
It's a one-step process for Trump in this hypothetical, with a binary answer:
1. Is there a valid indictment from New York?
If yes, then Florida has to issue an arrest warrant in Florida for Trump.
If no, then Florida doesn't have to issue an arrest warrant in Florida for Trump.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:02 pm to the808bass
quote:
It’s not DeSantis’ fight.
There’s no point in him being involved.
It's everybody's fight at the moment 808. This goes beyond the mere political boxing.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Q: President Obama, what is your response to concerns about Lois Lerner?
There is nothing to look into.
A: We're looking into it.
Q: President Obama, what is your response to concerns about about your AG lying to Congress?
A: We're looking into it.
Q: President Biden, what is your response to concerns about about classified information strewn around your beach house garage?
A: We're looking into it.
Q: General, what's the chance of all those people on Guam causing it to tip over?
A: We'll look into it.
This post was edited on 3/20/23 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:03 pm to LSUnation78
quote:
I really dont know why you desantites are so fricking defensive
Lol I'm not defensive. General platitudes and criticisms won't cut it anymore. That's kryptonite to many in the cult.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:03 pm to jlc05
quote:
That is weak af and will lose voters. He can take a much stronger stance while being clear that they won’t interfere.
Did you watch the entire speech?
A loser cherrypicked two sentences to make Desantis look bad
Very liberal-esque...
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:04 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
If you are so blind that you can not see that this will alter the use of our nation, then by all means, continue. But like I told 14... have at it. I'm not arguing with you any more on it. This is not some damn game to be played.
If the issue is bigger than Trump, then the system needs to be fixed. Kvetching over an instance of abuse won’t solve that.
Because it’s your ox being gored, you want DeSantis to jump in. But nothing is fixed by just addressing this one instance.
This post was edited on 3/20/23 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:04 pm to MSMHater
I meant that I think it would benefit DeSantis to at least look like he isn't so much on the side of the Trump haters. Trump attacking DeSantis is not good either. He runs his mouth too much some times just like a lot of New Yorkers. None of the infighting does the people any god.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Q: President Obama, what is your response to concerns about Lois Lerner?
A: We're looking into it.
Q: President Obama, what is your response to concerns about about your AG lying to Congress?
A: We're looking into it.
Q: President Biden, what is your response to concerns about about classified information strewn around your beach house garage?
A: We're looking into it.
None of these are as simple as a binary issue of an indictment existing or not.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:04 pm to the808bass
quote:
What’s the optics of fricking a pornstar and paying her off?
Stormy Daniels denies that. LINK
Stormy Daniels Denies Affair With Donald Trump: ‘It Never Happened’
She then lost in court because of that and had to pay Trump 300K
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:06 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
She then lost in court because of that and had to pay Trump 300K
Of course you're so wrong, as usual, but wrong in all the hilarious ways.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:06 pm to Jjdoc
He paid her for not fricking her?
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:06 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
This isn't a Trump BS. This is a political matter that directly affects the future of this nation.
I agree it's 100% political. I also agree that it "affects the future of this nation" but not because of Trump. Because it is yet, again, another brazen show by the left that they will weaponize the government to punish political opponents.
quote:
This is not some damn game to be played.
It is also not DeSantis responsibility. Especially considering the non-stop attack Trump has been doing on DeSantis. It's not "the end of the republic" because the Republic is not Donald Trump, and you thinking that shows how much of a Trump cheerleader you are.
quote:
None bigger than a political party taking out political opponents on something that is not even criminal.
Not DeSantis baggage. He has no requirement to hold it. This may go to the courts and will be thrown out.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:07 pm to FlexDawg
You attracted the entire TD chapter of the DeSantis cult
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:07 pm to the808bass
quote:
Because it’s your ox being gored, you want DeSantis to jump in.
Would be the same if the shoe was on any other foot.
I have posted to that over the last 6 years.
Somethings transcend who you want.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:08 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Somethings transcend who you want.
Then you should be fully behind RDS b/c he's much more likely to be able to thwart those "somethings' you are refencing.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Of course you're so wrong, as usual, but wrong in all the hilarious ways.
quote:
She then lost in court because of that and had to pay Trump 300K
I'm not wrong.
LINK
quote:
Stormy Daniels must pay $300k to Donald Trump after losing defamation case appeal
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:09 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
Would be the same if the shoe was on any other foot.
A false hypothesis implies any conclusion.
Posted on 3/20/23 at 1:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then you should be fully behind RDS b/c he's much more likely to be able to thwart those "somethings' you are refencing.
Jjdoc: "No, not THOSE things"
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News