Started By
Message

Mind-blowing: The Economic Consequences of Being Denied an Abortion

Posted on 1/31/23 at 2:56 pm
Posted by the_truman_shitshow
Member since Aug 2021
2755 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 2:56 pm
"...Following the encounter, women who were denied an abortion experience a large increase in financial distress that remains for several years."

American Economic Journal: Economic Policy vol. 15, no. 1, February 2023

Are we seriously this far gone in our society where it has come to the point of arguing for the termination of an infant in order to alleviate "financial burden"?

So let me get this straight - after having engaged in sexual intercourse, and I'm presuming consciously, outside of marriage, and never mind the fringe cases of rape/incest which account for less than 0.5 to 1% of pregnancies, that we can entertain the idea of killing the baby in favor of "alleviating financial burden" on the mother.

Moral relativity you say? How about absolutely evil to the core?
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
16928 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 2:57 pm to
Some people probably should have been aborted for the benefit of society. You know it. I know it.

The question is if it’s immoral. And it absolutely is. It’s murder and it should not be legal.
This post was edited on 1/31/23 at 2:58 pm
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119559 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

Mind-blowing: The Economic Consequences of Being Denied an Abortion


You should see the literal mind blowing from an abortion.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68939 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:06 pm to

It's about convenience.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22404 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:11 pm to
NEWSFLASH: Children are expensive to raise.

So basically if poor people were rendered sterile society would be better off? This is something Margaret Sanger would endorse.
Posted by TH095526
Member since Dec 2022
888 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:13 pm to
Well than maybe those women should've kept their legs closed. You have sex you know the risks take some goddamn accountability and learn how to budget for your child.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21953 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

...Following the encounter, women who were denied an abortion experience a large increase in financial distress that remains for several years.


Weird considerations for something women insist is a medical intervention.
Posted by Zarkinletch416
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2020
8492 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:25 pm to
How about the moral and economic consequences of fornicating? Fornication which leads to unplanned pregnancy. Which leads to government funded abortion.

This post was edited on 1/31/23 at 6:55 pm
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79525 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:29 pm to
Spending a trillion dollars to get appliances and vehicles off fossil fuels in what will be a likely futile effort to make any tangible impact on the environment is worth it, no cost is too high. But directly and and barbarically exterminating human lives for economic reasons is sensible and progressive.

Trust the science above all else, which says your toddler should get that vaccine and if not you're a death merchant. But his pediatrician needs to swear an oath that western medicine is not the only form of healing arts and pledge to decolonize medicine.

this is America in 2023

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:44 pm to
I have absolutely ZERO difficultly understanding your viewpoint. You view every genetically-unique human organism as having some great, inherent value, and that view shapes your analysis of the abortion issue. Given that underlying premise, your viewpoint makes perfect sense.

Why are you unable to grasp that not everyone shares your viewpoint and that many people do not see any "evil" whatsoever in the early termination of an unwanted pregnancy. That THIS viewpoint makes perfect sense, if one does NOT accept the premise that a human zygote or blastocyst or embryo has some unique, special value?

I have never felt that my viewpoint makes me inherently or morally superior to you. Why do you insist that those who do not share your viewpoint are inherently, morally inferior?
Posted by bamacoullion
Fayette, Alabama
Member since Oct 2008
1787 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:47 pm to
And the economic consequences of BIRTH CONTROL is?????
Posted by El Segundo Guy
SE OK
Member since Aug 2014
9694 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

How about absolutely evil to the core


I am a believer in the ideological premise of eugenics. I use the same principles in the breeding of my livestock. Pragmatically, it is impossible to impose on humans with authoritarian state, which I despise.

But to say it doesn't have it's benefits rooted in science and years of practical experience is naive.
This post was edited on 1/31/23 at 3:51 pm
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16645 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

experience a large increase in financial distress that remains for several years."

Did we really need a study to show that having kids will cause financial stress for several years?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263331 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:58 pm to
Whores and their fathers don't want inconvenience and the added expense of a child.

Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50572 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 3:58 pm to
LOL as if Progressive Democrats aren't getting govt money hand over fist to raise their kids.
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
12990 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 4:00 pm to
This was always the primary reason. They are just saying it out loud now. Women don’t want babies because they are financially and physically burdensome.

Unless they do in which case we have to pay for them upon pain of being jailed.

Seems a touch unfair.
Posted by High Desert
Member since Jan 2023
265 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 4:03 pm to
LOL. If a woman was trying to kill her 1 year old to save money and was prevented from doing so, there's no denying that it creates an economic impact.

I guess we should allow murder of pretty much any child that is going to cost the parent's money.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53544 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Are we seriously this far gone in our society where it has come to the point of arguing for the termination of an infant in order to alleviate "financial burden"?

Heck yeah

I’m tired of paying for all these future criminals baw
Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
5177 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 4:11 pm to
I've always thought that if you get an abortion on the tax payers dime then you should be mandated to also have a sterilization process done also.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
13780 posts
Posted on 1/31/23 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

"...Following the encounter, women who were denied an abortion experience a large increase in financial distress that remains for several years."


Good.

Murdering a baby should have dire consequences.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram