- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
4 BRPD officers in the parking lot of a mass shooting on Bennington.
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:01 pm
Two working extra duty and to actually at work. Three do noting and one runs to his car and leaves while people are shot. The local media is silent. Where are the GPS and body cams? It’s a complete coverup. I hope they are sued by everyone there. The city will settle.
20
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:03 pm to Amon
quote:
The local media is silent.
We now know the full story.
Move along. Nothing to see here.
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:06 pm to Amon
Yea, the concept of police is failing everywhere, Scruffy agrees, but you need to realize that, legally, the police are not obligated to respond to anything.
It looks bad, but it has been ruled by the US Supreme Court that police officers, essentially, do not have to help you.
It looks bad, but it has been ruled by the US Supreme Court that police officers, essentially, do not have to help you.
This post was edited on 1/23/23 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:06 pm to Amon
Are you saying 2 were on the BRPD clock and were just hanging out with the 2 that were hired by the venue ? .. And then only 1 intervened and no one was arrested ?
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:06 pm to Amon
Are you saying 2 were on the BRPD clock and were just hanging out with the 2 that were hired by the venue ? .. And then only 1 intervened and no one was arrested ?
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:07 pm to Scruffy
Explain Malfeasance in Office?
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:09 pm to Amon
You can FoIA everything there is to know about the shift. You'd be a target after though.
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:10 pm to Dominate308
LINK
That is from 2005. There are other cases.
quote:
The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.
That is from 2005. There are other cases.
This post was edited on 1/23/23 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:11 pm to Amon
Considering that people who willingly go to that club and are still hanging out there during that time of night, that’s pretty much an expressed disinterest in surviving. Why should cops get in the way?
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:11 pm to Scruffy
How did that work out for the cops in the Texas school shooting?
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:12 pm to Dominate308
quote:They can be fired, but it is highly doubtful that any lawsuit would proceed.
How did that work out for the cops in the Texas school shooting?
Or, if it was appealed, the courts have already ruled on similar situations.
They have the legal ability to act, but they aren’t legally obligated to.
This post was edited on 1/23/23 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:13 pm to Amon
Maybe Nak can leave the small town mayors alone and get on the scent of some body cams.
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:16 pm to OysterPoBoy
Makes me wonder how the shooter got away and why one cop left. Maybe the missing cop was the shooter’s ride.
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:17 pm to Amon
quote:Now this is fun conspiracy territory.
Makes me wonder how the shooter got away and why one cop left. Maybe the missing cop was the shooter’s ride.
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:17 pm to Amon
Nak real reporting is no longer. He's bought and paid for. UWK is the only one I really follow anymore.
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:22 pm to MrJimBeam
You dont need guns!
Police will protect you!
Police will protect you!
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:24 pm to Amon
Well, had they fired and killed the perp, they would be fired, out of a job, and on trial for murder, so I can see why they didn’t get involved.
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:24 pm to Amon
They thought they were getting that extra pay to do nothing. 
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:29 pm to Amon
quote:
Two working extra duty and to actually at work. Three do noting and one runs to his car and leaves while people are shot. The local media is silent. Where are the GPS and body cams? It’s a complete coverup. I hope they are sued by everyone there. The city will settle.
Is there anything reputable stating this or just Amon from TD?
Posted on 1/23/23 at 4:41 pm to Dominate308
quote:
Explain Malfeasance in Office?
§134. Malfeasance in office
quote:
A. Malfeasance in office is committed when any public officer or public employee shall:
(1) Intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, as such officer or employee; or
(2) Intentionally perform any such duty in an unlawful manner; or
(3) Knowingly permit any other public officer or public employee, under his authority, to intentionally refuse or fail to perform any duty lawfully required of him, or to perform any such duty in an unlawful manner; or
(4) Willfully and knowingly subject any person to the deprivation of any right, privilege, or immunity secured or protected by the United States Constitution and laws, if serious bodily injury or death results.
What duty was lawfully required?
This post was edited on 1/23/23 at 4:42 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News