- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:55 pm to bamarep
I heard Garland criminally probes his own butthole.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:55 pm to AggieHank86
Are they going to hand over all their reports and notes and case files from when it wasn’t independent, Hank? The stench of this whole thing is overwhelming.
This post was edited on 11/18/22 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:55 pm to Jjdoc
quote:No, I did not. But how about this:
defended grooming kids
Can you try to stay on topic, or does that tax your limited cognitive abilities beyond their capacity?
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:56 pm to FooManChoo
The WaPo news that Trump did not have nuke codes or do anything wrong or different than any other President lasted one headline.
Garland naming a special Counsel currently has
1,200,000,000 Results.
It is so obvious it is another political hit. Another million dollar waste of money.
This story is the only news right now and is probably blasting on radios everywhere. And no one says who.
Andrew Weissmann or Eric Holder? Or some Bushite that says they are fair.
Garland naming a special Counsel currently has
1,200,000,000 Results.
It is so obvious it is another political hit. Another million dollar waste of money.
This story is the only news right now and is probably blasting on radios everywhere. And no one says who.
Andrew Weissmann or Eric Holder? Or some Bushite that says they are fair.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:56 pm to bamarep
Gee who could have seen this coming? 
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:56 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:Because that is how an ordered mind examines multi-part questions, especially where one part of the question is entirely subjective and the other is reasonably-objective.
Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted.quote:
Why set that aside?
This post was edited on 11/18/22 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:57 pm to Strannix
quote:
will only steel the resolve of Trump supporters
all well and good.
unlike garland who is rightfully scared of political blowback, the special counsel has just one job.
evaluate whether the evidence and witnesses add up to a solid case vs citizen trump.
trump fam feelings don't matter.
anyone who was already betting against an indictment had better hedge now.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:57 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, I did not. But how about this:
Ya did!
quote:
Can you try to stay on topic, or does that tax your limited cognitive abilities beyond their capacity?
I am. You are a hack trying to be dismissive of what is happening.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:57 pm to bamarep
Unless there’s evidence we don’t know about, this is a political stunt.
Russiagate 2.0. Watch for leaks to the NYT in the run up to the election.
Russiagate 2.0. Watch for leaks to the NYT in the run up to the election.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:58 pm to davyjones
quote:One would hope.
Are they going to hand over all their reports and notes and case files from when it wasn’t independent, Hank? The stench of this whole thing is overwhelming.
But probably not.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:58 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Conducting such an investigation under the supervision of Biden's AG
Then they need to remove the word JUSTICE for the Department of Justice. Rule of Law and Due process aren't part of our current justice system at this present time. We have moved into Banana Republic status when the enforcement arm of our laws is beholden to a political party.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:58 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
Russiagate 2.0.
Russiagate 10
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:59 pm to cajunangelle
If ole Bob Mueller couldn’t find anything with his crack team, what makes this any different?
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Do you disagree with the analysis that any investigation should be independent rather than partisan?
I'll refer you to your own signature pic....
Because it would take an astonishingly high level of stupidity to believe, considering his track record, Garland would ever appoint someone truly independent to investigate Donald Trump. You can't be that stupid.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:59 pm to HailToTheChiz
quote:
They've given him an anal probe since 2016 and spied on him. Yet still nothing has been filed. They waited for his announcement and likely tried to strong arm him into not running
Wake up
Personally I don't support Trump or his politics but if I did, I would've moved on to Desantis by now. Who needs all this drama?
Posted on 11/18/22 at 12:59 pm to bamarep
Partisan behavior from Garland and the DOJ?
Say it aint so, Joe
Say it aint so, Joe
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:01 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Set aside the question of whether you think ANY investigation is warranted.
Well, unless you're a gdamnd Fascist, that's REALLY the only question that matters, a-hole...
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:01 pm to bamarep
Good thing Trump won't even get the Republican nomination
Now many of those fence-sitting Rs that have been peacocking around about how it's time to move on from Trump will be right back on the train.
Now many of those fence-sitting Rs that have been peacocking around about how it's time to move on from Trump will be right back on the train.
Posted on 11/18/22 at 1:01 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
You are a hack trying to be dismissive of what is happening.
Must be a day ending in "Y".
Page 3 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News