Started By
Message

Advice to my Dad

Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:29 am
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6346 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:29 am
So I was talking with my dad last night, and voiced my opinion of how I think things are going to get much worse in the economy. So much of what I read points to that and then you add in the geo politics of Europe/Russia/Ukraine, energy costs, OPEC cutting production, and economic hit in the EU that will affect the US as well.
I suggested he gets real conservative in his investments. He is 73 and said he is about 70% in stocks.
What do you guys suggest for retired folks to invest in and diversify into?
My first reaction is a money market, precious metals, and such to ride this out and see what happens in the next 6-12 months.
This post was edited on 10/5/22 at 7:30 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:33 am to
If your dad is in diversified stocks he probably doesn’t need you scaring the shite out of him and forcing him out down 20%+.

If the money he needs for the next 3-5 years is in relatively stable investments, leave him alone. He’s gone through many stock market downturns in his life, he’ll be fine.
Posted by PlanoPrivateer
Frisco, TX
Member since Jan 2004
2932 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:46 am to
I'm about the same age and retired. I'm about 60% stock and 40% bonds. I'm letting my current IRA and Roth Ira's ride. If I move from any of these to cash, then I am locking in a loss on the hope of avoiding further decline. I'm in a position (knock on wood) where I don't need to tap into these retirement accounts.

Any money I have left over after living expenses are going into a money market account. I've begun small purchases of beat-up stocks and mutual funds / ETF's. Examples are: INTC, MU, DOW and SPYG. Nobody knows when the market will turn around.

Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
31732 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:53 am to
quote:

If your dad is in diversified stocks he probably doesn’t need you scaring the shite out of him and forcing him out down 20%+. If the money he needs for the next 3-5 years is in relatively stable investments, leave him alone. He’s gone through many stock market downturns in his life, he’ll be fine.


So much this.
Posted by footballdude
BR
Member since Sep 2010
1113 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 7:57 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/26/22 at 9:18 am
Posted by Niner
Member since Apr 2019
2033 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 8:05 am to
quote:

I suggested he gets real conservative in his investments.
You will do more to hurt his long-term financial well-being if he follows your advice than drops in the market will.

Is he withdrawing from his assets on a regular basis? What's his withdrawal rate based on his total portfolio? How much of his assets will he need in the next 5 years? These are just some of the questions I'm asking before suggesting a certain level of risk.

Keep in mind, too, what you read and how the economy is doing does not directly translate to market performance all the time. As has been stated 1,000 times on this board, markets will start recovery before (sometimes well before) the economy does. If you're trying to time the market based on news/headlines, you're going to fail miserably.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6346 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 8:14 am to
You're right Joshjrn and Slackster. I probably am worrying for am more than I should. We've had a 30% drop so far and things continue to look worse. I just worry about him losing another 40% at his age.
But he is on top of the news, economy and geo politics and I should leave him alone.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6346 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 8:18 am to
Yeah, you're cprrect Niner.
He is withdrawing the required minimum. I believe their pensions and SS are keeping them afloat sufficiently. I had actually forgot about their pensions. So maybe I'm getting worked up over nothing.
But yes, what are you suggesting Niner?
This post was edited on 10/5/22 at 9:09 am
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10671 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 8:29 am to
Awful advice on the surface, without knowing much else.

I would stay out of your dads finances to begin with. If you want to help, hire a professional for him.
Posted by Niner
Member since Apr 2019
2033 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 8:45 am to
quote:

But yes, what are you suggesting Niner?
If they can stomach staying put, I'd stay put - only because markets are at lows (may get worse before it gets better). But like I said, those questions only scratch the surface of what I'd be figuring out.

If they withdraw the RMD every year, and nothing more, how long would their assets last with zero growth?

Are they building cash? If so, have they considered simply investing part, or all, of the RMD in a taxable brokerage account instead of spending it?
Posted by REB BEER
Laffy Yet
Member since Dec 2010
17713 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 9:08 am to
quote:

precious metals


Please don't
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
89316 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 9:36 am to
DO YOU NOT CELSIUS BRO?!?!?!?!?!?
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6346 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 12:31 pm to
100% Celsius. Thats the way to go.
Alright, you guys are right, I'll stay out of it. They are doing fine and have their pensions and aren't needing the investments at this time. Hopefully the markets are have done them well by the time they need to tap into it.
Thanks for the common sense and putting me in my place. I can always count on TD doing that.
Posted by Turf Taint
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2021
6010 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 12:45 pm to
73yo, retired and 70% stocks does not require advice. It requires Bourbon.

Kidding aside, hope he used more conservative strategy to cover his critical fixed expenses (health, food, clothing, shelter, etc). Add bourbon to that list.
Posted by TooSober
AA Meeting
Member since Oct 2015
627 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 1:08 pm to
Exactly... If you or he are not following it closely enough to have gotten out when the trend broke in January, then now is not the time to try and start that.
Posted by Jag_Warrior
Virginia
Member since May 2015
4292 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

He is 73 and said he is about 70% in stocks.


For his age, that is a pretty skewed portfolio allocation. But we don’t know what sectors he’s in. Is that equity allocation 80% tech or high beta growth stocks or a more conservative mix of div payers? And how has his portfolio performed during this downturn?

I agree with the other replies that now is probably not the time to blow out of equity positions en masse (unless he sees a fundamental breakdown in a particular stock). And the absolute worst thing for any longer term investor (not trader) to do is stay glued to the news or get emotional about daily fluctuations. But if he wants to diversify with new money, maybe pick up some shorter term T-notes or bills.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
32764 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 1:40 pm to
A 73 year old that’s retired should be at a lower risk level than 70% stocks
Posted by Texas Tea 123
Member since Sep 2017
287 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 1:53 pm to
Look the stock market is forward looking. In the present, it represents expectations about the future. Expectations are pretty grim right now, therefore the market is pricing in a lot of bad news. Is there still downside? Of course, but now probably not the time to be selling everything (retail generally pukes at the bottom, have to resist the urge and just stomach volatility).

If he owns meaningful $ amounts of individual stocks, it may be worth sharpening the pencil. If diversified in mutual funds, ETFs, etc, then I wouldn't touch it IF he doesn't need significant money in near term.

As one post said, 70% is probably not the right allocation to stocks right now at his age BUT now is not the time to change that. Give it a year then start repositioning.
This post was edited on 10/5/22 at 1:55 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91362 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

A 73 year old that’s retired should be at a lower risk level than 70% stocks


Just depends on his reliance rate really.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40326 posts
Posted on 10/5/22 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

A 73 year old that’s retired should be at a lower risk level than 70% stocks


Says who?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram