- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
60 minutes: remember when Trump criticized “forest management” during California’s fires ?
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:25 pm
Now on “60 minutes” they are saying ineptitude of forest management service of California resulted in wide spread destruction of property and life during the California fires due to mismanagement and negligence.
They laughed at him back then.
They laughed at him back then.
15
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:27 pm to Northwestern tiger
Considering that the vast majority of forests in California are federally owned, this isn’t the flex you think it is.
California owns only 3% of the forestland in the state. 3%
California owns only 3% of the forestland in the state. 3%
This post was edited on 10/2/22 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:30 pm to TBoy
They said it wasn't mismanagement but global warming
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:30 pm to TBoy
Tell that to 60 minutes. Apparently they are talking about that 3%
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:30 pm to TBoy
quote:
Considering that the vast majority of forests in California are federally owned, this isn’t the flex you think it is.
Not a good flex for you either. If Cali followed the many examples of other states with large amounts of Federal Land, it would still be a different story.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:31 pm to TBoy
quote:
Considering that the vast majority of forests in California are federally owned, this isn’t the flex you think it is.
California owns only 3% of the forestland in the state. 3%
So what you're saying is that it isn't California's fault, but Biden's fault?
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:33 pm to Northwestern tiger
A thing can only be true if it is uttered by the Regime or its designated mouthpieces.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 7:38 pm to TBoy
quote:
Considering that the vast majority of forests in California are federally owned, this isn’t the flex you think it is.
California owns only 3% of the forestland in the state. 3%
The whole state is about 100 million acres. This link says the state is responsible for the fire safety of 31 million acres. So I think you fricked up a decimal placement. Not 3%, but more like 30%.
LINK
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:16 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
They laughed at him back then.
Just like the German EU delegation in regards to DJTs prescient foretelling of dependance on Russian energy.
Who is more ignorant, the German delegation or Gavin Newsome and the MSM? (You can add TDS liberals to that question too)
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:16 pm to TBoy
Ownership \= management.
California controls the management with an iron fist.
California controls the management with an iron fist.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:19 pm to Northwestern tiger
And The View said Desantis caused hurricane Ike and Biden said getting the jab would protect people from Ike. What’s worse is millions believe it.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:22 pm to TBoy
It’s not a power flex on its own, but when you add it to the pot of a couple hundred or more other same type instances, that’s Super MAGA Flex.
This post was edited on 10/2/22 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:23 pm to TBoy
quote:
Considering that the vast majority of forests in California are federally owned, this isn’t the flex you think it is.
I do believe the Cali green climate brigade refused federal oversight of the forest management and opted for their own version instead. Sometimes, you get what you ask for.
The bigger question is if the green brigade changes their forest management protocols, or stays the course.
The fuel beds were exhausted in the fire zones.
What do they do in the remaining fuel loaded areas?
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:28 pm to Northwestern tiger
Trump being proven correct yet again.
Seems he certainly ends up being right an awful lot for a man who was really bad…and orange.
Seems he certainly ends up being right an awful lot for a man who was really bad…and orange.
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:30 pm to deeprig9
Tsoy talks out of his arse numerous times
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:36 pm to Northwestern tiger
quote:
Now on “60 minutes” they are saying ineptitude of forest management service of California resulted in wide spread destruction of property and life during the California fires due to mismanagement and negligence.
They laughed at him back then.
Man you are dumb.....the jist of the piece was that the fires started on federal property and the feds blew the response. The state fire agencies were pissed at the federal response and their lack of maintaining the forests and roads.
Jesus you are an idiot
This post was edited on 10/2/22 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:37 pm to Northwestern tiger
It’s both extreme negligence from the state combined with the tree die-offs that we’ve had here for a variety of reasons, including drought and disease. But if the state would do prescribed burns like they’re capable of and clear out the underbrush that has accumulated for decades these fires wouldn’t have anywhere near the impact they have. I encourage all of you to watch this documentary on the Creek Fire.
YouTube
YouTube
This post was edited on 10/2/22 at 8:38 pm
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:37 pm to TBoy
quote:
Considering that the vast majority of forests in California are federally owned, this isn’t the flex you think it is. California owns only 3% of the forestland in the state. 3%
Ok. So where was Trump wrong, though?
This post was edited on 10/2/22 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 10/2/22 at 8:59 pm to Northwestern tiger
They didn't laugh at him. They were pissed that he told them that their baby was ugly.
This post was edited on 10/2/22 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 10/2/22 at 9:04 pm to Smeg
quote:quote:So what you're saying is that it isn't California's fault, but Biden's fault?
Considering that the vast majority of forests in California are federally owned, this isn’t the flex you think it is.
California owns only 3% of the forestland in the state. 3%
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News