Started By
Message

re: LSU Baseball 2023 (and beyond) Recruiting Thread - Old Thread - Please unpin

Posted on 7/17/23 at 1:59 pm to
Posted by Cheesy Beaver
Kenna brah
Member since Dec 2014
4424 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

My opinion is at this point you are targeting Holman and Montgomery.


do we have any concrete support that we are being considered by montgomery? all i've seen in regards to him is that he is no contact and he's likely to go back to stanford
Posted by BayTiger13
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2022
2076 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 2:24 pm to
Hard to say concrete as I do not know anyone close to Braden to give concrete information. Rumors have always been State, LSU, A&M, or back to Stanford though. Rumors were that it was a long shot and then Sunday it seemed I read something that said LSU wasn't out of the conversation.

So to answer your question, I don't think anyone has any concrete info on his decision or thought process. All seems pretty tight lipped.

Just a gut feel but it seems like State or Stanford is the higher likely scenarios.
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6428 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 4:05 pm to
I think the fact that we took Mac means we either passed on Montgomery or didn't feel like we had a good shot to get him. Listening to Jay over the past season, he seems very keen on building a team and understanding what personality's mesh with his style. I don't think its a coincidence that Burns, Hill and possibly Montgomery have landed else where. Those players seemed like they wanted guaranteed spots. Something tells me Jay said if you come to LSU you have to earn your position. All speculation on my part.
Posted by ccarrone0313
Member since Jul 2021
1433 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

passed on Montgomery


This would never happen. I understand what you are saying and mostly agree but there's not a scenario that exists where they would just pass on him.
This post was edited on 7/17/23 at 4:11 pm
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6428 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

This would never happen. I understand what you are saying and mostly agree but there's not a scenario that exists where they would just pass on him.


You're right, I didn't explain myself well. If Montgomery wanted to be here, we would have taken him. I believe our staff didn't think we had a great shot at landing him. Hence why we got Mac.
Posted by BayTiger13
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2022
2076 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 4:15 pm to
I don't think Mac has anything to do with Montgomery. I think Mac was the tiger emoji the week of the draft we were all wondering who it was. They were just waiting for the draft and teams to feel him out and when he decided not to go MLB is when they went public with it. That tiger emoji by Jay was before Montgomery even entered the portal, so I don't think taking Mac has any influence on going after Montgomery.
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12375 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 4:43 pm to
You act as if it’s already over by saying “we would have taken him.” Not sure where you are getting this information that we aren’t continuing to try for one of the best players in the entire portal.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278723 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 5:04 pm to
They aren’t passing on Montgomery or burns lol
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2486 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

You're right, I didn't explain myself well. If Montgomery wanted to be here, we would have taken him. I believe our staff didn't think we had a great shot at landing him. Hence why we got Mac.


I had these feelings as well. Im not sure why so many here can’t fathom that scenario. It may be wrong but it makes logical sense
Posted by ccarrone0313
Member since Jul 2021
1433 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

I had these feelings as well. Im not sure why so many here can’t fathom that scenario. It may be wrong but it makes logical sense


We will pursue Montgomery until he says "I'm going elsewhere". You don't not pursue that kind of talent out of an assumption that he wouldn't come. Not the way this staff recruits. We can't fathom that scenario because it's not how Jay operates. He's aggressive and he's a great recruiter. He'll move on when Montgomery says no but I don't believe he would move on without knowing.
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2486 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

We will pursue Montgomery until he says "I'm going elsewhere". You don't not pursue that kind of talent out of an assumption that he wouldn't come. Not the way this staff recruits. We can't fathom that scenario because it's not how Jay operates. He's aggressive and he's a great recruiter. He'll move on when Montgomery says no but I don't believe he would move on without knowing.


Of course. I agree but what you just said doesn’t contradict the idea that it’s possible that the staff took Bingham because they felt less confident in Montgomery. Again, one event could be completely unrelated to the other but, as of now, we are all just speculating on what every little detail means because there has been so few details or information that has emerged recently.

Taking Bingham could possibly be an indication that they feel less confident in Montgomery choosing us but they would most certainly still pursue him. That’s all I was trying to say.

Edited for clarity’s sake
This post was edited on 7/17/23 at 6:30 pm
Posted by Tight 10
Member since Nov 2021
266 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 6:18 pm to
Hearing the same
Posted by banthony1
Member since Jan 2012
109 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 6:36 pm to
it’s kind of obvious Bringham has been on board for over 2 weeks now..well before Montgomery entered the portal. So it’s not a stretch to say the two are unrelated
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2486 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 6:41 pm to
That’s a good point, if true.
I thought the talks about Montgomery wanting to look elsewhere started far before he entered the portal but I could be wrong on that. Checking the post 10x a day has all these details bleeding together lol
This post was edited on 7/17/23 at 6:42 pm
Posted by Northshore_LSU
Member since Jun 2018
879 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

it’s kind of obvious Bringham has been on board for over 2 weeks now..well before Montgomery entered the portal.


This is it. Bingham was committed before LSU before Montgomery ever entered the portal. He was just waiting to announce until after the draft.
Posted by banthony1
Member since Jan 2012
109 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 7:05 pm to
you never know until the player actually enters though and Bingham is an elite veteran college player that Jay would have wanted on this roster regardless
Posted by hall59tiger
Member since Oct 2013
2486 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 7:11 pm to
Very true. I like Bingham and I love Montgomery so I will be happy if I am wrong. Maybe part of me is bracing for the possibility of him going to MSST

Now, assuming we get Montgomery, I’d happily switch Bingham for a proven MIF guy right now but I trust Jay to make whatever scenario ends up happening work out in our favor
Posted by Tigerboy55
Member since Feb 2020
711 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 7:16 pm to
Rooney followed 2 new portal targets (we’ve been recruiting them)
Aiden May RHP - Arizona
Mason Molina LHP - Texas tech
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
66229 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Mason Molina LHP - Texas tech


100+ strikeouts. Nice.
Posted by GeauxTime9
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2010
6428 posts
Posted on 7/17/23 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

Mason Molina LHP - Texas tech


Didn’t he commit to Arkansas?
first pageprev pagePage 238 of 297Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram