re: Why Dyson Daniels?

quote:

---

His shooting form looks textbook.

---

I don’t think it’s textbook, there’s a weird hitch at times, alligator arms it, a bit of a push off shot, shoots over his eye which can mess up depth perception.

But that’s a good thing imo.

If it were textbook we might be facing a Cam Redish situation, where there’s nothing to fix and it’s beyond mechanics and at that point, there’s not much you can do

quote:

---

I think Vinson will fix his outside/perimeter issues in time.

---

Sick and fricking tired of hearing this. Why does every one of our players need to be fixed for shooting. Just draft a guy who can shoot and quit picking projects. Terrible pick

Shooting is fixable.

Defense? Athleticism? Wingspan? Less so.

bullshite. By the time it’s fixed he will be on a different team

No who’s that? Last time I checked you need more than 2 people who can shoot on a team

Daniels has a good release but doesn't use his lower body enough, hence the "push" look of the shot.

He has touch. It's all very fixable.

Agreed

It’s not anywhere close to the mess Lonzo had coming to Vinson

A few tweaks and some repitiiton and I think it’s very doable, which, he has already shown some growth with, so that’s a good sign.

You’re kind of retarded huh?

You can't reason with certain people unfortunately.

I think “universal” is overstating it slightly but, yes, he along with Mathurin and Ivey were considered the kind of guys we should get.