Started By
Message

2000 Mules Fact Checking

Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:37 am
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
9551 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:37 am
Read 6 Fact Checking articles from news papers across the US.

As I expected, the lack of the movie to directly tie it all together with even one person or show one person going to different boxes on video and their cell path leads to it all just being speculation or assumption…without a single person or org identified. Having only one whistleblower and no names didn’t do any favors. In fact, it allowed the issue to be easily written off.

I think they were close but pulled the trigger too soon. Hopefully, the data dump they say is coming has something more substantial, but feels like this is where every big gotcha ends up.

Denver Post example
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 8:38 am
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35511 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:43 am to
quote:

the lack of the movie to directly tie it all together with even one person or show one person going to different boxes on video and their cell path
At this point we have to assume that this doesn't exist. Pretty clear they looked for it and it would be in the movie if they could find it.
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5285 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:49 am to
I haven't seen the movie yet but what would be the explanation for a person's cell phone being within close proximity of 20+ drop boxes in one night?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111803 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:54 am to
quote:

allowed the issue to be easily written off.


You only easily write off the 2020 election fraud if you’re a fundamentally dishonest person.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39768 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:55 am to
quote:

only one whistleblower


Odd. Not all that long ago these same "journalists" thought this was more than enough to impeach a president.
Posted by GetBackToWork
Member since Dec 2007
6282 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 8:55 am to
Here's what I have never understood. All it takes is to offer a substantial award for confidential information confirming allegations of fraud.

Offer a $1M prize for a whistleblower(s) providing documentation confirming without a doubt the tactics, intent, and results of the ballot operation. Given the low paid types helping run these non-profit advocacy org.s, someone would come forward.

This has worked in the past. For that matter, do the same for media bias as well.
Posted by Lptigerfan
Jeff Davis Parish
Member since May 2015
608 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:00 am to
First, I completely believe that the election was stolen. But, I must say, I am so tired of all these different sites with their "shocking proof to be released soon" bs. Show me proof or shut up. They are just all trying to make money.
Posted by Timeoday
Easter Island
Member since Aug 2020
9617 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:02 am to
For those who have seen it we should expect this type of response from the MSM. It is why you have to forward links to the documentary "2000 Mules" to every contact you have in your possession asking them to do the very same thing. After 7 degress of separation, millions more will have seen this remarkable ducumentary.

2000 Mules For those of you needing the link.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20298 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:06 am to
quote:

2000 Mules Fact Checking


Most the time these “fact checkers” are more needy of being looked at for veracity than who they claim they are checking!
Posted by LafTiger
Member since Dec 2008
1300 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:07 am to
Funny part is I read this “fact check” yesterday.

It’s full of “half truths” like “cell phone tracking data isn’t as accurate as they say it is.” They then fail to mention they have people on CAMERA. (That’s corroboration of the initial evidence of in court)

I do wish they would have shown the same person at multiple drop boxes.

What I found really interesting about the Denver Post article wasn’t the article. (Leftist only fact check what is true, so I expected these)

The COMMENTS however are gold! Yesterday pretty much everyone called out the writer and outline most of the “misinformation” she tried to spew.

So, while I wanted more from the movie, it’s serving it’s purpose. People are recognizing the lies now and are in the the leftist game.

After all. There’s what I can prove and there’s what I know.

I grew up in New Orleans. What the movie shows is just a new skin on an old game.
Posted by TigerIron
Member since Feb 2021
3105 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:14 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 2:31 pm
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
61888 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:15 am to
quote:

without a single person or org identified.

For better or worse, the American people must be slow walked into the reality that there isn't a single bit of our election systems that are neither safe nor secure.

The movie is but the opening salvo of awareness.

Your strategy of rushing headlong into naming names is a surefire recipe for libel/slander/defamation suits, which only lend credence to the endless "REEEEEEEEEEEEEE"ing from the left and the nutless RINOs.

The dEbOOnKiNg from the MSM fails to account for the fact that passing by 100 dropboxes doesn't get you in their study. Neither does visiting a single NGO.

What puts you above the Mendoza Line is visiting at least 1 NGO a minimum of 5 times, AND hitting up approx. 30 dropboxes, in succession.
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
9424 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:16 am to
IF there was this kind/level of circumstantial evidence found for me in regards to a crime, any DA wouldn't have any issue indicting me, arresting me and bringing me before a court while the investigators connect the dots for a slam dunk sentencing.
Posted by BaldEagleHey
Member since May 2020
458 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:21 am to
quote:

As I expected, the lack of the movie to directly tie it all together with even one person or show one person going to different boxes on video and their cell path leads to it all just being speculation or assumption…without a single person or org identified. Having only one whistleblower and no names didn’t do any favors. In fact, it allowed the issue to be easily written off.


Uhh...

At the 30:30 min mark, they do just what you are saying they did not do. They show the path of one of the GA mules dropping off at multiple dropboxes and at the 5 non-profits.

Here is the map they display:
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
61888 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 9:23 am to
You'll get your names when indictments begin dropping. They've already established that the Venn Diagram of ballot traffickers and BLM/ANTIFA actors during the George Floyd Memorial Hunger Games is a perfect circle.
Posted by Shamoan
Member since Feb 2019
9472 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 10:59 am to
the fact that its up to an Indian-American commentator to put in a little leg work to expose election fraud tells you everything you need to know. nobody is interested in exposing fraud. most of our leaders are cowards.
Posted by Griffindawg
Member since Oct 2013
6219 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 11:06 am to
The only thing I know is that a person I met had an eye witness account of three cars with North Carolina tags loaded with ballots pulling up to a large polling location in Gwinnett county ga on election night and asking out the window where the ballot drop was.
Posted by Marshhen
Port Eads
Member since Nov 2018
676 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 11:24 am to
They clearly showed multiple people on camera submitting numerous ballots which is illegal. Those are fraudulent ballots. It was also law for each ballot box to be monitored via CCTV which they weren’t.

At this point, most honest people know the election was stolen and are only fighting for these states to JUST FOLLOW THE LAW!

Sure, I’d love for Biden to step down but that is probably a pipe dream. I just want fair elections. Sadly, there are people who openly break the law because they are brainwashed to think that they are justified to do so because the talking heads on MSM convinced them that they should.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
27538 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 11:40 am to
I didn't read the whole thread, but have the people who put out the movie explained why they did not at least name the NGO's involved?
This post was edited on 5/12/22 at 11:41 am
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73835 posts
Posted on 5/12/22 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Read 6 Fact Checking articles from news papers across the US.





like facebook fact checkers that were proven to be bullshite left wing liars?

facebook fact checks are just mere opinion
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram