- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"Legal Experts" call Trump v. HRC et al... lawsuit, Utterly Hopeless & Batshit
Posted on 3/26/22 at 6:43 am
Posted on 3/26/22 at 6:43 am
We know every time "experts" that think they are our overlords above all make proclamations.
They are always wrong in acting as legal or intel community experts in their hyper partisan, downright OMB hate.
Just like the 51 Intel Community "experts" that were WRONG about muh Russia that Trump was an agent of Putin's.
Let's put these legal expert hacks on record...
The only thing is: they are never held accountable or called out later rarely if ever---- in paragraph 17 of news articles. But they are always wrong.
LINK
LINK
They are always wrong in acting as legal or intel community experts in their hyper partisan, downright OMB hate.
Just like the 51 Intel Community "experts" that were WRONG about muh Russia that Trump was an agent of Putin's.
Let's put these legal expert hacks on record...
The only thing is: they are never held accountable or called out later rarely if ever---- in paragraph 17 of news articles. But they are always wrong.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 3/26/22 at 6:49 am
32
Posted on 3/26/22 at 6:51 am to cajunangelle
This will be fun to watch what happens, problem is there are way to many activist judges to even give this a true time it needs... they will toss it for one reason ... TDS...
Posted on 3/26/22 at 6:53 am to cajunangelle
The new definition of expert seems to be anyone who supports the liberal position.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:26 am to cajunangelle
These must be the same experts who knew the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:28 am to cajunangelle
The swamp is deep. And wide.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:30 am to cajunangelle
quote:As mush as it pains me to say, this is one instance where big mouthed libs are in the driver's seat.
Trump's team is lead by Alina Habba. She intends to use RICO statutes as legal basis for her arguments. RICO has never been successfully applied in a setting like this. That challenge is coupled with Habba's inexperience in the field. Inexperience is a misnomer. She has no experience in RICO litigation at all. NOTHING! So the Hillary team will be primed to get the thing thrown out of court entirely.
Discovery will not occur before motions to dismiss are litigated.
It gets worse. Habba is a 38-yr old from a second-rate university and a third-rate law school who specialized in family law in her small NJ firm. Her top legal qualities appear to be telegenicity and a heavy presence at Trump's Bedminster NJ Golf Club before being hired.
Her law school, Widener (PA), is the lesser branch of Widener University's law school in Wilmington, Delaware. The latter enjoys the dubious distinction of being ranked in 2019 among the 20 worst law schools in the country, just beneath Southern.
Not good.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:31 am to cajunangelle
I haven't read it, but Kennerly's tweet could very well bite him in the arse because I bet it is about the claims that there was shite about Trump on the Russian Bank servers in Trump Tower (a lie Hillary repeated in a number of occasions)
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:36 am to cajunangelle
Perhaps discovery is the goal? Also wondering why wait until now?
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:37 am to cajunangelle
Lol…the lawsuit is already having its intended effect.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:45 am to cajunangelle
The “legal experts” rush in and say it’s absurd?? That really means grab the popcorn.
Same as when “fact checkers” rush in and “debunked!!1!”
Same as when “fact checkers” rush in and “debunked!!1!”
Posted on 3/26/22 at 7:47 am to cajunangelle
quote:
We know every time "experts" that think they are our overlords above all make proclamations.
They are always wrong in acting as legal or intel community experts in their hyper partisan, downright OMB hate.
Just like the 51 Intel Community "experts" that were WRONG about muh Russia that Trump was an agent of Putin's.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:00 am to cajunangelle
There is zero chance of this lawsuit prevailing. Not because it is without merit but because it’s a fixed fight.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:07 am to cajunangelle
It’s amazing how fast they circle the wagons. Democrats don’t even have to ask anymore
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:16 am to cajunangelle
Man, for all their talk about diversity that’s a whole lot of white folks. 
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:28 am to cajunangelle
These corrupt rat bastards are scared shitless their house of cards, built on a foundation of deception is going to collapse.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:51 am to cajunangelle
The experts are right. This is just Trump artificially manufacturing an angle that made him the president last time.
If you can’t see that, you’re too far gone down the rightoid media hole.
If you can’t see that, you’re too far gone down the rightoid media hole.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 8:57 am to cajunangelle
Yeah I think lolsuit is spot on.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:00 am to cajunangelle
Yeah. The real experts are Powell, Wood, and Giuliani. Lol.
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:18 am to cajunangelle
LOL still muh russia!
Posted on 3/26/22 at 9:20 am to cajunangelle
Hyperbolic snap judgements given by people who know nothing of the evidence?
How very Democrat of them.
How very Democrat of them.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News