Started By
Message
locked post

Is the Russian Army Really Failing?

Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:40 pm
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19264 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:40 pm
I am no military expert, but I can compare what Russia is doing to past military operations. Ukraine is about 50% larger than Iraq and it took American forces about a month to get to and take Baghdad. The coalition sent in 177,000 ground troops into Iraq and it still took over a month.

So why is everyone saying Russia has failed just because they haven't taken a larger country (Ukraine) in under a week? Honest question.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
25400 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:43 pm to
Well, for one, I would expect Iraq (a fairly formidable army in its day) to put up a hell of a lot more fight than Ukraine.

If I recall correctly, Iraq was the #4 team on the planet at one point in the not too distant past.

They also had a more distinct home field advantage over us than would be the case between Russia and Ukraine.
This post was edited on 3/1/22 at 10:44 pm
Posted by GoAwayImBaitn
On an island in the marsh
Member since Jul 2018
2842 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:44 pm to
They appear to be continuing their advance in a country who is resisting. Seems like they aren't failing that badly.
Posted by GhostOfFreedom
Member since Jan 2021
13098 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:45 pm to
We didn't suffer the loses that Russia is sustaining. They can conquer Biden's slush country, but they are going to pay stiff loses. Lot's of young men are dying on both sides. Lots of damage being done.

Posted by blackandgolddude
Virginia Beach
Member since Apr 2012
3527 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:46 pm to
We had to get all of that to the other side of the planet, and then get it over the border safely and to the capital.


Kyiv is less than a tank of gas from Moscow.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:46 pm to
because we live in the age of instant gratification. this war was over last night. they cut off the roads and surrounded all the cities.

ukraine doesn't have the forces to hold the country only to hold some cities and provide an insurrgency for the long run.
This post was edited on 3/1/22 at 10:48 pm
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8857 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:47 pm to
Russia never wanted to fight for Ukraine. They hoped to scare them into submission. The Russians look inept. Will they win? They damn well should. But the limited access to western weapons and training has allowed a much smaller force to inflict a lot of pain. Likely they have already lost more people and equipment than the us did during the entirety of the Iraq invasion and years of insurgency.

And by being forced to resort to more brutal force they force they are increasingly becoming an international pariah. Their own people are pissed and I suspect the Russian military is none too pleased. This has been a disaster for Russia.
This post was edited on 3/1/22 at 10:48 pm
Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
8610 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:50 pm to
Lord No... This isn't even the beginning of the army.

Russian army once defeated Hitler in great Patriotic war. Now Russian Army is Hitler.
Posted by RuLSU
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2007
8131 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

So why is everyone saying Russia has failed just because they haven't taken a larger country (Ukraine) in under a week? Honest question

Either Ukraine has an excellent propaganda or the Russians have made some really bad mistakes.

Reports that the Russians expected Ukrainians to flee like the Afghan government. Instead, they stood and fought.

There are credible reports of machines breaking down, troop desertion, heavy casualties, heavy equipment loss, etc.

It's still highly likely the Russians take over Ukraine. But they face a long and brutal insurgency, equipment shortages, a damaged economy and a lot of uncertainty.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
20700 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:52 pm to
From everything we’ve always been told of led to believe about the Russia military it almost appears to just be going through the motions. You get the sence they are winning against an overmatched opponent but it’s sloppy and indecisive. Ukraine for its part has put up a spirited fight but I just don’t see an overall strategy from them.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Ukraine has an excellent propaganda
THIS When you are a client of the CIA and US State Department you get staunch lying
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
16167 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Kyiv is less than a tank of gas from Moscow.



Yea they are letting the hundreds of thousands of people evacuate to decrease the innocent deaths. If they havent moved in another 7 days then there will be a problem.
Posted by RuLSU
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2007
8131 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

Yea they are letting the hundreds of thousands of people evacuate to decrease the innocent deaths. If they havent moved in another 7 days then there will be a problem.

They supposedly blocked the city. They're moving 2-4 miles per day.

At this rate Ukraine will reach Moscow before the "convoy" reaches Kyiv.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:55 pm to
Russia will not take all of Ukraine. They will take everything east of the Dnieper.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
30960 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 10:55 pm to
What I want to know.. why aren't the Ukrainians out there with dynamite and dozers, bringing down the hills over the road in front of the russian convoy? and behind it?
Posted by Bow08tie
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2011
4531 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 11:00 pm to
No
Fake Fake Fake
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
16167 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 11:01 pm to
Its a slow squeeze. You will know when they give full effort.. they will shell that city to the ground. After the people have been given a chance to leave. They hope to save as much as infrastructure as possible. But if they need to they will level it. Until their demands are met.
Posted by sacrathetic
Member since May 2019
618 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 11:02 pm to
Take it FWIW, but here's an analysis that Vox Day reposted today on his blog:

Ukraine Invasion: A Comparative Analysis
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

Russia will not take all of Ukraine. They will take everything east of the Dnieper.

Why do you say that? They launched attacks all the way into western Ukraine last night. Why are they settling for half the territory after the cost we placed on the invasion for them.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103145 posts
Posted on 3/1/22 at 11:03 pm to
In general, Russia shouldn’t be having this much trouble given that they already control Belarus and the eastern puppet provinces and their home country is just over the border.

From a US perspective, this would be like Texas being unable to invade Arkansas despite having Oklahoma and the southwest portion of the state already under their control.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram