Started By
Message

re: Aggies: Which Texas hire would scare you most?

Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:58 pm to
Posted by ColoradoAg
Colorado
Member since Sep 2011
27575 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:58 pm to
Sumlin
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21771 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

Even Saban to Texass wasn't scary.


lulz
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21771 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:00 pm to
quote:


Channeling my inner Brer Rabbit, I would be terrified if they hired Dennis Franchione.



Well played.

Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21771 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:03 pm to
quote:


With that said though, they couldn't hire a better coach.


I concur.

Briles is perfect for Texas.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37498 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

no hire at Texas is scary as log as they are trapped in the Big 12.



that's just silly

they have an easier road to a NC in the Big 12. A great coaching hire puts them in position to keep more Texas kids in state instead of leaving.

Unlike most of the other Big 12 teams they have the LHN to pull in more than enough revenue to make up for not being in teh Big 10 or SEC.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61468 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:18 pm to
Vast majority of kids DGAF about the easiest path the title.

They want to be in the biggest and baddest conference around.

They want to be seen on TV and play schools people care about.

That ain't gonna happen in the Big 12 as presently constructed.

So long as A&M is in the SEC and Texas is in the Big 12 there is very little to worry about. Simply being in the SEC is enough to win a ton of recruiting battles.
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21771 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:21 pm to
quote:


So long as A&M is in the SEC and Texas is in the Big 12 there is very little to worry about. Simply being in the SEC is enough to win a ton of recruiting battles.


Using that logic, it seems unfathomable that Florida State could beat Florida the way they did this year.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37498 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Simply being in the SEC is enough to win a ton of recruiting battles.



I think time will tell on that one and the answer will be no it is not.

A&M justifiably has some buzz right now because of their first year in the SEC and they look good in comparison to Texas with Mack fading of late. But Texas is still teh #1 program in the state and a legit coaching hire brings a lot of kids back into the fold.
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23862 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

keep more Texas kids in state instead of leaving


Huh??

They already clean up in state! That was Mack's sole focus when he arrived at Texas. He even told kids in Texas that if they weren't coming to UT, they ought to go to a University in state. This is no BS.

Just don't understand how anyone can possibly think Saban to UT would somehow be scary to A&M at this point. We are not in the Big 12 with them and they have a history of awesome recruiting classes with Mack Brown.

How scared will LSU be if Saban went to UT?? That's about how scared we will be. We don't play them. End of story.

Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23447 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

no hire at Texas is scary as log as they are trapped in the Big 12.


Disagree.

An undefeated Big 12 team is in the four team playoff next year.
If that team is Texas or Oklahoma, that is a definite fact. Toss in the fact that with Nebraska and A&M (and yes, Mizzou and Colorado) having left, and you have a significant loss of "traditional" competition for the top spot; Nebraska and Colorado had won national titles within the past 2 decades or so, A&M has always been capable of a top 10 finish, and Mizzou this past decade has been on the verge of becoming a serious national contender. The teams they replaced them with just don't carry the same weight.

People are forgetting this in the disaster of the last week- Texas is still positioned to become a perennial contender, if they can get past Oklahoma. That's a lot easier than being in the SEC. It's the reason Urban Meyer will stay at Ohio St, and if Texas plays their cards right, they can become elite in a hurry.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61468 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

Using that logic, it seems unfathomable that Florida State could beat Florida the way they did this year.


uhh no

you seem to think I am saying that A&M will always be able to beat Texas at everything now.

That isn't what I am saying at all.

I am saying there is zero reason to fear a good hire at Texas. So what if they may occasionally be better? They are now the 5th best conference. That will hurt their recruiting regardless of who coaches there.

They also refuse to play us so they can't ever point to beating us down as a reason they are a better school to go to.

Again, kids will see that the SEC puts by far the most players into the NFL and many kids that normally would have gone to Texas and OU will pick A&M b/c of it.

The only school that really has anything to fear from a good hire at Texas is OU.


Also, Jimbo Fisher isn't the reason Florida is having problems.
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21771 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 9:07 pm to
quote:


Also, Jimbo Fisher isn't the reason Florida is having problems.


Florida State has been pulling in top 10 recruiting classes for years and they compete with several SEC schools for that talent.

What makes the state of Texas so different from Florida?

Florida State does just fine recruiting. I'm sure Texas will too with the right coach.
Posted by SWCBonfire
South Texas
Member since Aug 2011
1418 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 9:21 pm to
No matter who is the head bus driver in Austin, they still cannot take more than 25 or so recruits a year. We will be fine as long as we take care of what we can take care of.

And Mack BS Brown actively tried to convince JFF to leave the state to play QB. He is nothing but a snake oil salesman who only cares about his own image.
Posted by Grim
Member since Dec 2013
12489 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

There's no way in hell that Art Briles is going to Texas. He just isn't the type of guy to accept an offer there

Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63365 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Sumlin will be taking the first bus out of Cult Station before a cat can lick its arse


quote:

before a cat can lick its arse



Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63365 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 10:18 pm to
Also for a serious answer Gus would not be good. He's really the only the realistic option that would scare me some, we will still get ours recruiting wise though
Posted by BrerTiger
Valley of the Long Grey Cloud
Member since Sep 2011
21771 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 11:17 pm to
quote:


No matter who is the head bus driver in Austin, they still cannot take more than 25 or so recruits a year. We will be fine as long as we take care of what we can take care of.



Point well taken.

By the same token, with the right coach Texas should have no trouble limiting out on top talent.

Highway 6 runs both ways, so I've heard.
Posted by SWCBonfire
South Texas
Member since Aug 2011
1418 posts
Posted on 12/16/13 at 7:01 am to
I get what you are saying, but it's not like the sips have always been this Juggernaut of recruiting prowess... they are subject to long down periods coupled with mediocre competition. They struggled when the SWC was in its death throes, when top talent either went to A&M or left the state to seek better competition. We've stuck them in a slightly larger SWC, and unlike Arkansas we aren't leaving our recruiting grounds behind.
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
9405 posts
Posted on 12/16/13 at 8:16 am to
quote:

quote:
no hire at Texas is scary as log as they are trapped in the Big 12.



Disagree.

An undefeated Big 12 team is in the four team playoff next year. A one loss SEC team may be in, may not be. A&M now plays in the most competitive division and conference in the country as evidenced by the last seven national championship appearances.

If the next coach at Texas runs off consecutive seasons of 1 or zero losses and A&M continues to lose 3 to 4 conference games, they have a lot to be scared of with the new playoff format.


See this is where you guys get lost.

Simply because Texas is in the B12 and they hire whomever doesn't mean they will magically start rolling off undefeated seasons and go to the Playoff. In fact the odds are against it, the B12 is several notches below the SEC for sure but it has a lot of games that are easy to lose every year. It's a round robin/9 game schedule against a lot of tough little teams that nobody cares about. For instance, flying halfway across the country to play in Morgantown sucks. Going up to Manhattan Kansas to play against a bunch of JUCO guys and a crafty old Bill Snyder sucks. All it takes is dropping one of those games and the season is shot.

There are many reasons the B12 and the LHN hurts Texas though, a lot of it is exposure. The LHN money is a joke, you are talking about less than $10 million they actually get for an AD that makes over $150 million. It doesn't change anything about what Texas does. What it does do though is it takes 2 or 3 games and puts them on a network no one sees. It puts all the coaches shows there too. Did you not see the stat that going into the last game only 14 million people had seen a Texas game while over 52 million had seen an A&M game? Even if you take out JFF and Texas improves that's a Grand Canyon sized gap to make up that is almost impossible playing games on the LHN and Fox Sports1.

The other half of the equation is the assumption that A&M is going to only get worse because JFF is gone. The problem with that is it ignores the major uptick in A&M's recruiting. Our defensive classes prior to 2013 that took the field had about 3 combined 4 Star players on them, from 2013 on almost all of them are 4 Stars or above. The offense has also upticked in a big way. A&M has gotten it done by hitting home runs with some 3 Stars like Manziel and Evans up to now, going forward that won't be the same.

It's also ridiculous to talk about the past (esp the '00s). Virtually everything has changed. A&M is now bigger than Texas. We have better facilities and soon to be a far better stadium. We always had a better gameday atmosphere. The money difference between the school is now negligible. Our exposure level is far superior and we play huge games in the dominant conference in the country.

Of course if Texas starts going undefeated every year while A&M sucks they will do better in recruiting than we will. That's not a news flash. The question to consider though is what if both teams are doing well (which is most likely) or if A&M wins while Texas struggles? Texas has no defense against an A&M team that is successful in the SEC, we will crush them in recruiting in that case. We are crushing them right now and we are the 4th best team in the West this season and lost all of our big games, what do you think happens when we break through?
Posted by Hugh McElroy
Member since Sep 2013
19995 posts
Posted on 12/16/13 at 8:55 am to
It's going to be really interesting to see who they hire. They are NOT going to get one of the big names they have thrown around. I think it's Briles (who I do not think would accept the job, but I could be wrong), Gus (I have no idea if he would go or not), Strong (he'd take the job in a second), maybe Franklin, maybe Dabo...I really don't know.

I do know that none of those guys scare me at Texas.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram