- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I'm so sick of shitty cell phone battery life
Posted on 3/22/17 at 10:08 pm to lesthemadhatter
Posted on 3/22/17 at 10:08 pm to lesthemadhatter
I'd love to get a Pixel but I'm still on the stupid next plan shite at AT&T for this G4 and the Pixel isn't on AT&T to swap
Posted on 3/22/17 at 10:37 pm to hendersonshands
Buy an unlocked phone. You'll be happier
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:04 pm to efrad
quote:That's why I called it an insinuation.
I don't see where he said anything about Google
quote:Because it doesn't matter what code LG or whatever manufacturer writes, in the end it runs on top of Google's code. Google's code allows this bad code to run on its platform and do things that hurt the user experience. This is a conscious decision as a tradeoff for also allowing software that improves the experience.
Why do you say this insinuates that Google is writing bad code when you yourself admit the control is often in the hands of the phone manufacturer?
iOS has a ton of 3rd party software running on it just as Android does, so what exactly should it mean when one says "because Apple writes good code" in response to an iPhone user reporting good battery life in a thread about an Android phone with poor battery life? Especially considering he then "elaborated" with something about "minimal processes"?
quote:Yeah, I did say I did a few searches, stated that the results may be misleading, and also to take them for what they're worth. Did I not sufficiently express that I realized there were flaws?
I don't claim the iPhone to have any better or worse battery life than Android handsets, but that's a pretty flawed way of researching.
quote:I am aware. I think generally people search for iPhone rather than iOS in most cases. And in the case of Android, I tried to cover as many searches as possible by using the OS rather than any of the hundreds of different phone models. Also, I looked at the worldwide results, and since Android phones outnumber iPhones by a lot, I thought for sure there would be more searches for Android vs. iPhone. I did what I could in 2 minutes to satisfy my curiosity.
You're comparing search queries for the name of a phone vs. the name of a phone operating system for one
quote:Another reason I went with Android and iPhone rather than a specific Android phone/line or a specific iPhone model.
not to mention the iPhone has a 10-year legacy as the only name ever used for Apple's mobile phones vs. a variety of names over the years of hot-selling Android-based phones.
quote:I haven't seen anything that I would call "way more", they're in the same ballpark in almost all cases. Which, when you look at the global market share, says (to me) that Android phones don't have particularly worse battery problems than iPhones do. And that's all I was getting at.
Of course you're going to get way more hits for iPhone.
Posted on 3/22/17 at 11:38 pm to hendersonshands
I've had the S7 for well over a year now after switching from a iPhone 6+. The 6 would last me all day and on heavy usage would get down to about 15% by 10pm. The S7 has a smaller battery and I still find I can make it all day on normal days. On Higher usage days I would have to charge at some point but the fast charger gets me well above 50% in 30 min. Get rid of the stock launcher and use either nova or Google now. Then disable anything you don't use and drop your screen brightness to at least half. Finally, delete the Facebook app and install Metal.
Posted on 3/23/17 at 7:03 am to hendersonshands
I carry two phones, my old 5s and a Moto X Pure.
If oyu just let them sit without using them the iPhone will have 85-90% left at the end of a work day. My Moto might be lucky to have 70% left with the same usage pattern.
Use my iPhone heavily like playing a demanding game and it will be dead in not too much longer than an hour. My Moto will last about 2 playing the same game (Pokemon Go).
If oyu just let them sit without using them the iPhone will have 85-90% left at the end of a work day. My Moto might be lucky to have 70% left with the same usage pattern.
Use my iPhone heavily like playing a demanding game and it will be dead in not too much longer than an hour. My Moto will last about 2 playing the same game (Pokemon Go).
Posted on 3/23/17 at 8:24 am to Korkstand
Fundamentally, (In general) a program (whether large or small) that is written efficiently (minimal processes), will require less resources to be executed (ALU, CPU, GPU) and in return for most multi core processors will not required to run at full load. This means essentially a quad core processor can execute a program using only 1 or 2 of its cores allowing the other two to stay dormant. This is the V-6 that can change into 4 cylinder mode to save gas in an car.
The savings can be fragments a la pennies on the dollar, but if you do this a million times the savings become real and significant in terms of operational capability and not impact the user experience.
Ergo at the opportunity cost of having worse battery life. A phone / software provider may allow 3rd party applications to be more accessible to it's core "code" ie. Android or iOS (in this case swift is still the devkit used I believe.)
Of course you can simply redesign the hardware of the phone to be significantly smaller and place more of the vital parts on the processing unit itself (System on a chip) giving more space for a larger mAH battery to offset this.
Or you can just attempt to be great at both.
The savings can be fragments a la pennies on the dollar, but if you do this a million times the savings become real and significant in terms of operational capability and not impact the user experience.
Ergo at the opportunity cost of having worse battery life. A phone / software provider may allow 3rd party applications to be more accessible to it's core "code" ie. Android or iOS (in this case swift is still the devkit used I believe.)
Of course you can simply redesign the hardware of the phone to be significantly smaller and place more of the vital parts on the processing unit itself (System on a chip) giving more space for a larger mAH battery to offset this.
Or you can just attempt to be great at both.
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:53 am to 50_Tiger
I'm not sure what you're going on about, I know how hardware and software work.
quote:That's what I said, it's a design decision, not a question of code quality.
at the opportunity cost of having worse battery life. A phone / software provider may allow 3rd party applications to be more accessible to it's core "code"
Posted on 3/23/17 at 11:38 am to Korkstand
quote:
Yeah, I did say I did a few searches, stated that the results may be misleading, and also to take them for what they're worth. Did I not sufficiently express that I realized there were flaws?
I'm not sure if you're having a bad day or if you sensed some kind of hostility from my post but I didn't mean it that way.

Yes, you did say there were flaws in the line of reasoning but I am trying to point out that there are so many variables in play in these queries that I don't even think it's worth trying to use it to even get a notion about battery life on the two platforms.
As an example:
quote:
Also, I looked at the worldwide results, and since Android phones outnumber iPhones by a lot, I thought for sure there would be more searches for Android vs. iPhone.
That's more flawed than you seem to realize, because you're doing search queries in English on an anglo-centric search engine, and the iPhone commands a larger market share in English-speaking communities than it does in other communities, yet you're factoring in worldwide total sales volume.
I know you aren't saying this proves anything, but I don't even think it's worth a curiosity.
quote:
Because it doesn't matter what code LG or whatever manufacturer writes, in the end it runs on top of Google's code. Google's code allows this bad code to run on its platform and do things that hurt the user experience. This is a conscious decision as a tradeoff for also allowing software that improves the experience.
iOS has a ton of 3rd party software running on it just as Android does, so what exactly should it mean when one says "because Apple writes good code" in response to an iPhone user reporting good battery life in a thread about an Android phone with poor battery life? Especially considering he then "elaborated" with something about "minimal processes"?
You seem to be contradictory here... The first paragraph you acknowledge that Google allows greater access to its platform to 3rd parties, and that this access can result in poor performance... and in the 2nd paragraph you seem to say that iOS has the same burden from 3rd party software?
The Android platform is plagued by the same problem that the Windows platform has had for most of its life, and that's OEM bundled software that is 9 times out of 10 complete garbage. iOS doesn't have this. So I would say if you grabbed the average Android handset and the average iPhone handset and compared them, you'd likely find more garbage code on the Android handset. That doesn't mean Android itself or Google's code is worse, but the platform, by its very open nature, has the potential to be much worse (or better!) than iOS.
Posted on 3/23/17 at 12:32 pm to efrad
quote:Nope, sometimes I guess I just come off as an arse. Sorry about that.
I'm not sure if you're having a bad day or if you sensed some kind of hostility from my post but I didn't mean it that way.

quote:Obviously I do not know the details about Google Trends' algorithms or translation details, but I have to assume that they do translate and normalize the data the best they can. Otherwise, like you suggest, the data would be meaningless.
That's more flawed than you seem to realize, because you're doing search queries in English on an anglo-centric search engine, and the iPhone commands a larger market share in English-speaking communities than it does in other communities, yet you're factoring in worldwide total sales volume.
quote:We all have our own interests, I guess.
I know you aren't saying this proves anything, but I don't even think it's worth a curiosity.
quote:I can see how it may seem contradictory, so I probably didn't explain well enough. I realize it is a nuanced point that I'm trying to make.
You seem to be contradictory here... The first paragraph you acknowledge that Google allows greater access to its platform to 3rd parties, and that this access can result in poor performance... and in the 2nd paragraph you seem to say that iOS has the same burden from 3rd party software?
What I was getting at is 3rd party code runs on both platforms. So, in the context of this thread, when someone says "because Apple writes good code" in response to a claim that an iPhone has good battery life, the obvious takeaway is that the OS/platform is ultimately responsible for battery life. I agree with this, as I think either company could write their OS so that the battery lasts a week, regardless of what 3rd party code is on it. The phones just might not be particularly useful or enjoyable to use.
Does this make sense? With a statement like "because Apple writes good code", there is an implied "as opposed to bad code on the other platform", is there not? And since the statement was framed with the supporting "minimal processes", this also implies that the OS/platform itself has ultimate control (if it wants it). Though that point should be self-evident.
I guess what I'm saying is that "Apple writes good code" is at best a poor choice of words. Some variation of "iOS was written with battery life in mind" or "..as a core feature" would be preferable to implying that Android's code is of poor quality.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 6:09 am to hendersonshands
I have the lifeproof fre case with the backup battery. I click the button on the back when I get down to 20% and it gets me back to 100%.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 7:04 am to hendersonshands
What about email? If you cache a lot of mail on your phone it can wreak havoc on battery life.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 7:52 am to hendersonshands
I had to buy one of these external batteries and have it on me a good bit of the time. My phone can barely make it through an entire work day with all the radio/podcasts I listen to. No chance of making it through an all day tailgating kind of day. Note 5 FWIW.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 3/24/17 at 7:53 am
Posted on 3/24/17 at 3:00 pm to bountyhunter
I clear my cache pretty frequently
Posted on 3/24/17 at 3:23 pm to hendersonshands
Dude buy a new phone already
Posted on 3/24/17 at 7:15 pm to Dr.Funke
quote:
What I found worked was just to stop my email from syncing and do it manually
I followed this advice, and my battery charge actually lasted much longer today. Can't believe I didn't try this before.
This post was edited on 3/24/17 at 7:16 pm
Posted on 3/24/17 at 8:22 pm to Korkstand
i have an iPhone 6. as of right now its not taking a charge.
i did a soft reset and that didn't help.
then i tried my original cable that came with the phone. I got a new for Christmas and haven't had problems until today.
still nothing.
then I tried charging through a usb port from my computer.. nothing.
i even took a tooth pick and got a little debris out of the port on my phone but that didn't work.
i think its a software issue.
any other ideas?
I got the phone in June so its under warranty but I doubt its the battery. I really don't use my phone THAT much.
i did a soft reset and that didn't help.
then i tried my original cable that came with the phone. I got a new for Christmas and haven't had problems until today.
still nothing.
then I tried charging through a usb port from my computer.. nothing.
i even took a tooth pick and got a little debris out of the port on my phone but that didn't work.
i think its a software issue.
any other ideas?
I got the phone in June so its under warranty but I doubt its the battery. I really don't use my phone THAT much.
Posted on 3/24/17 at 10:27 pm to hendersonshands
I had the LG3 and it had the worst battery life ever. Switched to the Galaxy Note which has been much better.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 8:47 am to hendersonshands
I charge my four year old iPhone 5 three days / week. So far, the battery is hanging in there.
Nokia is bringing back the 3310: LINK
Nokia is bringing back the 3310: LINK
Posted on 3/25/17 at 10:40 am to PortCityTiger24
Got the LG V20 because it's a top of the line phone and yet has a removable battery. However, with the solid battery life and fast charge I haven't bothered to get an extra one. Upgrade.
Posted on 3/25/17 at 11:12 pm to List Eater
quote:Yep, my Nexus 6P is going the same route. I feel like every phone I've ever had, around the 1 year mark of owning it, the battery goes to shite, and my 6P just started doing the same.
I feel you man. My Nexus 6P ended up being useless because of the battery life. It would also turn off if it said I had anywhere from 20-30% left
Coworker and I were in an all day retreat type thing at work. He had whatever the latest iPhone is, we used our phones basically the same amount of time during the day. When we left, he was at 74%, and I was at 27%. Very annoying.
Not sure what else to do.
Popular
Back to top
