Started By
Message

Home security cameras

Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:06 am
Posted by HogsWillRiseAgain
Central LA
Member since Dec 2013
829 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:06 am
I’ve done some research online but there are so many different systems it’s making my head spin and I’m looking for some info/reviews from actual people. The only thing that I definitely want is wireless/bluetooth. What do you have? Pros, cons, suggestions
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65650 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:09 am to
You suspect Jody (Arkansas-speak for "Family Member")
Posted by jsk020
Nola
Member since Jan 2013
1697 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:10 am to
Eufy is great and no cost per month
Posted by Sev09
Nantucket
Member since Feb 2011
15558 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:21 am to
I’d advise Nest over Ring, having experience with both. Outside of that, can’t provide anything.
Posted by ScopeCreep
In the thick
Member since Jul 2016
638 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:23 am to
I’ve got Arlo doorbell cam and Pro3 cams on my house. They’re wireless with battery power. Last a good 3-4 weeks on a charge. But they’re a bit of a pain with motion detection from trees and shrubs, they pick it up and record it which shortens battery life.

They’re good but have their flaws. I like the system overall but it’s a little pricey IMO. Something cheaper probably exists that will do the job.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11178 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:24 am to
Nest is really good.
Posted by SLafourche07
Member since Feb 2008
9928 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:31 am to
quote:

I’d advise Nest over Ring



Can you explain why?
Posted by StonewallJack
Member since Apr 2008
685 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:43 am to
Get the Blink camera system
Posted by MSWebfoot
Hernando
Member since Oct 2011
3263 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:56 am to
Wyze- cheap, reliable and no contracts.
Posted by OmniPundit
Florida
Member since Sep 2018
1440 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

cheap, reliable and no contracts.


Thanks. Some of my favorite words.
This post was edited on 11/9/20 at 12:21 pm
Posted by hollowpoint
Texas
Member since Sep 2019
1039 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:22 pm to
We have tried both Nest and Ring - and both have advantages/disadvantages. Biggest issues for us: Some of the Ring hardware is absolute crap, and Nest forces you to setup a Google account, which we didn't want.

Finally just got tired of having multiple apps, so we converted everything to ADT provided equipment. Already had the ADT alarm system from the previous owner. Now if there are any problems, I am not left to troubleshoot, just call and the issue is handled by someone else. Alarm system, doorbell, indoor cameras, outdoor cameras and thermostats - all managed by ADT.

Posted by hollowpoint
Texas
Member since Sep 2019
1039 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Nest is really good.

It was, before they required everyone to have a Google account. They have enough of my data already, no need to give them access inside my home.
Posted by drdoct
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2015
1609 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Wyze- cheap, reliable and no contracts.


I agree. Wyze cameras are like $25. Get the plain one and stick it under your eaves if you are doing outside. Stick a card in it and you can record 24/7. Can access it via the interwebs anywhere you have service. I've had 3 outside under the eaves of the house for over a year without a problem. They now have an outdoor version but it doesn't always record, just motion records. I'd rather have it all on card to look over.

Posted by cberni1
Metry
Member since Jun 2012
528 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 2:23 pm to
While I know you mentioned you definitely want wireless, I just want to provide some experience from my perspective that may or may not be of value to you.

I had 4 Nest cameras (3 outdoor, 1 doorbell) with nest aware and was running ATT 75mgbs internet with a TpLInk Deco M5 mesh system. While the 25 mgbs download speed on wireless devices was sufficient to run my cameras, the 6-7 mgbs upload speed i had just wasn't enough to handle the consistent motion alerts, etc that was being sent to nest aware on a regularly basis. Therefore, 1 camera would always drop offline for 15 minutes and it became useless if I couldn't have consistent recording on my cameras. I scoured the internet and could never find a good resolution between Nest or TPLink so i gave up and bought a POE camera system and haven't looked back. I still have all the features like remote viewing on an app, motion detection etc, but on a more reliable platform in my situation.

The point here is just be cognizant that wireless cameras are only as good as your bandwith and connection so keep that in mind when purchasing and placing the camera in relation to your router.
This post was edited on 11/9/20 at 2:25 pm
Posted by Boudreaux35
BR
Member since Sep 2007
21449 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

I’ve got Arlo doorbell cam and Pro3 cams on my house. They’re wireless with battery power. Last a good 3-4 weeks on a charge.


Is 3 to 4 weeks standard for these type devices? That seems short.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43523 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 6:39 pm to
I’d build my own system using blue iris and a dedicated wireless network for cameras. You can get much better quality cameras and can do a lot of customization on how you want to record and store.
Posted by geauxgurl
Huntsville, AL
Member since Jan 2013
61 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 6:44 pm to
We have 3 Blink cameras - battery operated, easy to setup, and not that expensive. We have had ours for over a year and not had to change any batteries. Would recommend but also have friends with Ring and Nest who like them. Try a google search with "xxx vs yyy" - with xxx and yyy being a camera system (wyze, blink, nest, ring, arlo, etc.) Can also do comparing 3. Blink and Wyze considered "budget options."
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28707 posts
Posted on 11/9/20 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

Is 3 to 4 weeks standard for these type devices? That seems short.
It depends entirely on how much action they see and how the motion detection is set up. A couple events per day, it might last a few months. Motion every 15 minutes, you'll be charging every few days.

Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23921 posts
Posted on 11/10/20 at 5:38 am to
quote:

The only thing that I definitely want is wireless/bluetooth.


No, you don't. Wired Cameras are

1). Cheaper.
2). More reliable.
3). Have better resolution for the $$$.
4). Always on.
5). You don't have to depend on the internet/cloud to save your footage.
6). Are not as vulnerable to hackers as wireless cams.

One thing people don't often consider with wireless cameras is ALL of them have a latency time when they "wake up" from sleep mode. Sleep mode is required on wireless cams because they simply don't have the battery power to be on 24/7/365. That latency time causes them to miss events that wired cams don't. Additionally, adding a bunch of wireless cameras can take up a bunch of bandwidth on your network. (Even with only wired cameras in my system, I solve this problem by having a dedicated security camera only network)

Yes wired cams are harder to install. Their benefits are worth it. With power over Ethernet (POE) cams you only have to run 1 wire.
This post was edited on 11/10/20 at 7:45 am
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28707 posts
Posted on 11/10/20 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Yes wired cams are harder to install. Their benefits are worth it. With power over Ethernet (POE) cams you only have to run 1 wire.
Yep. Wired when possible, wireless when necessary.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram