Started By
Message

Barn is 350' from house, how to get a wifi signal?

Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:27 am
Posted by jpcajun
Member since Nov 2010
1204 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:27 am
My barn is approx 350 - 360' away from my house and I am looking to get a wifi signal inside the barn for various reasons. Any idea? What do i need to purchase? Thx
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78042 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 10:08 am to


Two of these. One connects to your router via ethernet and if you can see the barn from inside your house through a window, you can mount it somewhere unobtrusive. I have mine mounted on the side of a built-in bookshelf that faces a corner so nobody notices it.

The second one goes on the outside of your barn (just need power.

i think the range is up to 5 miles so you should be covered.

$65
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 10:10 am
Posted by bluebarracuda
Member since Oct 2011
18234 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 10:09 am to
Do you have a clear line of sight from your house to the barn? Ubiquiti powerbeams are good options if you have a clear LOS
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51580 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 10:20 am to
Beam it (what the other two responses have been) or trench it and run an ethernet cable that entire length. Those are your choices. Going with the Ubiquiti is going to be the fastest setup and most cost-effective way to go (unless you just happen to have a trencher and a few hundred feet of Cat 6 and conduit lying around )
Posted by broadhead
Member since Oct 2014
2104 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Beam it (what the other two responses have been) or trench it and run an ethernet cable that entire length. Those are your choices. Going with the Ubiquiti is going to be the fastest setup and most cost-effective way to go (unless you just happen to have a trencher and a few hundred feet of Cat 6 and conduit lying around )


I know your kidding about ethernet but you would be beyond the distance limitations of that cable. So the cheap solution is the wireless bridge like suggested or bury some fiber. Go the wireless bridge route.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78042 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Going with the Ubiquiti is going to be the fastest setup and most cost-effective way to go


gigabyte nanobeams are fricking fast as hell. no reason to hardwire your barn, ever.
Posted by TAMU-93
Sachse, TX
Member since Oct 2012
898 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 11:04 am to
CAD has the right solution. Here's a two pack of the new nanobeams:

NanoBeam NBE-5AC-Gen2

You'll also need an access point for the barn:

Ubiquiti Unifi Ap-AC Lite

We are assuming you have line of site between the house and the barn. And the barn has power.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43535 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

I know your kidding about ethernet but you would be beyond the distance limitations of that cable.
it would work with no issue at the distance he proposes. Doesn’t mean he should do it but it will definitely work fine.
Posted by jpcajun
Member since Nov 2010
1204 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 12:42 pm to
Yes, barn has powers and a clear line of sight
Posted by jennyjones
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Apr 2006
9313 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

it would work with no issue at the distance he proposes. Doesn’t mean he should do it but it will definitely work fine.


350' is somewhat marginal for CAT 6 at least from my experience .

I recently ran 350-360 feet of CAT 6 underground for a POE camera and it would not work until I put an inline booster fwiw.

Maybe an LAN connection will work further than POE
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 2:38 pm
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28707 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

I recently ran 350-360 feet of CAT 6 underground for a POE camera and it would not work until I put an inline booster fwiw.
Yeah that is slightly further than spec range for poe. It might work with quality cable of sufficient gauge, but I wouldn't trust it to be reliable.
Posted by 3deadtrolls
lafayette
Member since Jan 2014
5697 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 4:02 pm to
I've installed the Ubiquiti LiteAP AC on each end for similar stuff and have had good uptime and throughput.

LINK /

The NanoBeams would work great as well.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 4:04 pm
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
38685 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 4:36 pm to
My brother has his music studio about 150' behind his house and since musicians are live streaming shows now, he discovered how poor using your phone is as a hotspot for high bandwidth things like video and music. I had him buy enough cat5 to reach out there and install a wireless access point and that is working. But he is rolling up the cat5 when not using it and so not that convenient. Trenching would be tough as he has a swimming pool and concrete deck between the studio and house. Would the Ubiquiti or Beam bandwidth be robust enough for live streaming?
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78042 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 4:58 pm to
absolutely.

keep in mind if he attaches a $10 switch to the beam connected to his pool house he's effectively hard-wired at gigabit speed.

the gig nano beam is the shite. the weakest link would be the access point wifi in the pool house so i would put a 5 or 10 port switch in there along w/ the access point and hardwire everything he can.

the beam signal is rock solid. the app is super easy to use and you can see in real time on phone when you get the 2 disks dialed in.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 4:59 pm
Posted by jennyjones
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Apr 2006
9313 posts
Posted on 5/13/20 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Yeah that is slightly further than spec range for poe. It might work with quality cable of sufficient gauge, but I wouldn't trust it to be reliable.


I used high quality underground rated solid copper cable in conduit and figured it would work, but it didnt. (I had to run mine through an attic, down a hill and under a dock, so CAT 6 was my only realistic choice) The Veracity passive extender I used saved the day and works like a fricking champ luckily.

To the previous posters' points about renting a trencher and running conduit- trust me it is a pain in the arse project and will not be cheaper than the beams when all is said and done especially factoring in your time.

Beams would be a no brainer in this situation with not needing POE.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 9:35 pm
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28707 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 1:16 am to
quote:

I used high quality underground rated solid copper cable in conduit and figured it would work, but it didnt.
Good to know that the specs are pretty damned accurate. Might save some of us a lot of work in the future.
quote:

The Veracity passive extender I used saved the day and works like a fricking champ luckily.
Also good to know.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28707 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 1:33 am to
quote:

Would the Ubiquiti or Beam bandwidth be robust enough for live streaming?
I'm going to second everything CAD said about these. I've installed a few sets of nanobeams, and they've been rock solid. They're easy to install, easy to link up, and then you can forget about them.

They are plenty fast enough for streaming video, good enough for at least a dozen simultaneous 4k streams. Latency is negligible, on par with hard wire. And they're good for a few miles, so 150' is nothing.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51580 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 8:26 am to
quote:

it would work with no issue at the distance he proposes. Doesn’t mean he should do it but it will definitely work fine.



Max distance on Cat6 is ~328 feet. If he was absolutely set on running a line out there he would need to run fiber and convert. It could be done with Cat6 but it would need more than just dropping the cable in the trench and plugging it into switches on either end.

I didn't think anyone would take me seriously on that comment.

If I had to run a cable over the 100m limit of Cat6 I would just pony up for fiber and some converters.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43535 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 8:18 pm to
It will still work. 100 meters is the max distance for the spec. That doesn’t mean it won’t work for a consumer. I’ve read people doing over 450 foot runs.
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 5/15/20 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Maybe an LAN connection will work further than POE

Absolutely.
I've run some 500+' for residential purposes, the customer always knowing the likelyhood of it being flawless is not high.
Power is always your distance limitation on a 26 gauge wire.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram