- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Barn is 350' from house, how to get a wifi signal?
Posted on 5/17/20 at 4:58 pm to shawnlsu
Posted on 5/17/20 at 4:58 pm to shawnlsu
quote:
Absolutely.
I've run some 500+' for residential purposes, the customer always knowing the likelyhood of it being flawless is not high.
Power is always your distance limitation on a 26 gauge wire.
Great info. Good to know.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 8:48 am to shawnlsu
quote:
Absolutely.
I've run some 500+' for residential purposes, the customer always knowing the likelyhood of it being flawless is not high.
Power is always your distance limitation on a 26 gauge wire.
Besides the distance issue, your biggest problem with copper is going to be lightning. Even with surge suppression at both ends we still see significant issues.
Either go beam or go fiber.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 1:34 pm to msu202020
quote:Here to back up msu202020: a client had inter-building cabling run underground between two buildings maybe 150 wire-feet apart (connections to the phone-room in each building). They were constantly blowing up stuff, despite heavy copper grounding.
Besides the distance issue, your biggest problem with copper is going to be lightning. Even with surge suppression at both ends we still see significant issues.
Either go beam or go fiber.
We converted everything between the buildings to fiber, making sure we didn't miss things like old phone wiring or TV cable. Problem solved.
Posted on 6/8/20 at 4:19 pm to DoctorTechnical
I had to put internet almost a 1000' from my house at my gate. No clear line of sight and wifi wouldn't work even with dedicated antennas. I laid down RG11 cable point to point and installed multimedia over coax (MOAC) converters at each end. My upload and download speeds at the gate are the same as they are at home, zero appreciable loss. I placed an access point at the far end. After three years I have lost the AP once and the MOAC converter once presumably to lightning. Both are less than $30 on amazon. Picked up a 1500' roll of RG11 off craigslist for $50. Works great.
Posted on 6/9/20 at 7:21 am to CAD703X
Slightly different situation.
What can I use to send my beach condos WiFi down to where I sit on the beach. Trying to stream music on AT&T and Sprint service resulted in a lot of buffering. Either from weak signal or just a lot of people on the same cell tower hogging bandwidth. My Speedtest resulted in as low as .10 to maybe 2.0 at times.
I’d like to have a easy option of hooking up a long range AP of sorts in my condo to setup a network I can access from the beach. I forgot to see about how far it is tho. I’d guess a cpl hundred yards?
Would a Nano HD reach out that far with a 2.4 signal?
What can I use to send my beach condos WiFi down to where I sit on the beach. Trying to stream music on AT&T and Sprint service resulted in a lot of buffering. Either from weak signal or just a lot of people on the same cell tower hogging bandwidth. My Speedtest resulted in as low as .10 to maybe 2.0 at times.
I’d like to have a easy option of hooking up a long range AP of sorts in my condo to setup a network I can access from the beach. I forgot to see about how far it is tho. I’d guess a cpl hundred yards?
Would a Nano HD reach out that far with a 2.4 signal?
Posted on 6/9/20 at 8:26 am to NOLAGT
A couple of hundred yards outside is a very difficult one. Better off setting up the phone as a hotspot.
Posted on 6/9/20 at 12:47 pm to CAD703X
So I'm interested in these as well now.
Correct me where I'm wrong.
You buy 2 nano beams.
Beam 1- Would be connected to power and Ethernet.
Beam 2- Would be connected to power and then to a access point of my choosing (Wifi Router) via Ethernet.
You align them using the app. Beam 1 would act as a sender, beam 2 the receiver, and said connected router would work fine?
My parents have a outdoor kitchen/shop roughly 200-250 feet behind their house. They host games, cook, etc out there. Their home WiFi doesn't reach so for years they have been "hot spotting" a phone to their smart TV for connection to stream what they are watching.....but obviously are plagued with endless buffering and auto down res. Iv been meaning to run cat 6 and install an access point out there for them but obviously this would be a far easier fix.
Correct me where I'm wrong.
You buy 2 nano beams.
Beam 1- Would be connected to power and Ethernet.
Beam 2- Would be connected to power and then to a access point of my choosing (Wifi Router) via Ethernet.
You align them using the app. Beam 1 would act as a sender, beam 2 the receiver, and said connected router would work fine?
My parents have a outdoor kitchen/shop roughly 200-250 feet behind their house. They host games, cook, etc out there. Their home WiFi doesn't reach so for years they have been "hot spotting" a phone to their smart TV for connection to stream what they are watching.....but obviously are plagued with endless buffering and auto down res. Iv been meaning to run cat 6 and install an access point out there for them but obviously this would be a far easier fix.
Posted on 6/9/20 at 1:25 pm to NOLAGT
quote:Do you have line of sight?
I’d like to have a easy option of hooking up a long range AP of sorts in my condo to setup a network I can access from the beach. I forgot to see about how far it is tho. I’d guess a cpl hundred yards?
Posted on 6/9/20 at 1:47 pm to southern686
quote:Basically, yes.
Correct me where I'm wrong.
You buy 2 nano beams.
Beam 1- Would be connected to power and Ethernet.
Beam 2- Would be connected to power and then to a access point of my choosing (Wifi Router) via Ethernet.
You align them using the app. Beam 1 would act as a sender, beam 2 the receiver, and said connected router would work fine?
They should come with a PoE adapter, so they get power and network through the one cable. One of them goes in "access point" mode, and the other in "station" mode, I don't think it matters which is which but I would put the one on the router side as the AP. Mount them and point them at each other, there's even a handy LED signal meter on the device I believe.
Once they are configured and aligned, they should work exactly as if they were connected by a cable, like they aren't even there. The cable coming from your router goes to the PoE injector, then injector to AP nanobeam. On the other end, signal comes in through the station nanobeam, then PoE injector, then on to a small switch. Then you can plug whatever you need into the switch, a wifi access point, hardwire to TV, etc., and it should work exactly as if that switch had a long cable run to the router in the house.
Posted on 6/9/20 at 2:22 pm to VABuckeye
The phone is the problem. I use Pandora or Spotify app on my phone and I have some ultimate ears megabooms for the speakers.
I do have line of site...totally guessing on the distance but I think 150-200 yards. I'll be back on the 4th of July so I can check but id like to have something to try because its going to be jam packed
I do have line of site...totally guessing on the distance but I think 150-200 yards. I'll be back on the 4th of July so I can check but id like to have something to try because its going to be jam packed
This post was edited on 6/9/20 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 6/9/20 at 4:13 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Korkstand
After my post I was finally able to find their 'quick start' guide. I see exactly what you're saying. This seems like the best remedy for my parents, I will be passing this along.
Thanks again.
Posted on 6/10/20 at 10:50 am to CAD703X
quote:There was a time when a lot of people thought you would never need more than a second phone line and a 14.4 modem, too.
gigabyte nanobeams are fricking fast as hell. no reason to hardwire your barn, ever.
But I agree that wireless gives you a lot more flexibility.
This post was edited on 6/10/20 at 10:54 am
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:13 am to NOLAGT
You're going to need a power source on the beach for an antenna.
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:41 pm to shawnlsu
What kind of antenna? I have usb battery packs 
Posted on 6/11/20 at 8:58 pm to jpcajun
Run an ethernet cable from the house to the barn. Rent a wire layer and do it. Everything else sucks. Finally gave up and did it with my shop and it is wayyyyy better
Posted on 6/11/20 at 9:19 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:While I am all about wired when possible, wireless when necessary, I wouldn't say "everything else sucks". Can I ask what you tried that sucked? Because wireless point to point bridges absolutely do NOT suck. It is a focused wireless signal that can create a solid connection across miles if you need it to. And 350' is kind of pushing the limits for a cat6 run anyway, especially if it's 350' between structures and there is more footage once you're inside. There is a decent chance that it won't work without a repeater.
Run an ethernet cable from the house to the barn. Rent a wire layer and do it. Everything else sucks. Finally gave up and did it with my shop and it is wayyyyy better
Posted on 6/14/20 at 6:29 am to jennyjones
Do the setup below in the link? This is what RV's use. I use a TP-Link router instead of the Cube in the video.
LINK
LINK
Popular
Back to top

0







