Started By
Message

re: Apple Or Android? May The Battle Continue.

Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:11 pm to
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28709 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

leftist Government eurocrats telling private businesses what they can and cannot do is not a good thing. Let the market place decide these things.
it's not that simple, the marketplace breaks down all the fricking time.

There is a reason nearly every country on earth has antitrust laws. There is a reason governments have been regulating abuses of monopoly positions for hundreds of years. It is necessary.
Posted by faraway
Member since Nov 2022
2051 posts
Posted on 3/12/24 at 9:56 pm to
the only people who choose Apple are the clueless people who never try Android. Android is 10x more user friendly. unfortunately for me, both of my work devices are Apple.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11223 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 3:12 am to
quote:

There is a reason nearly every country on earth has antitrust laws. There is a reason governments have been regulating abuses of monopoly positions for hundreds of years.


Just because it's a "closed" system doesn't make it a monopoly. What monopoly did Apple have over the lighting connector that the EU recently forced to change to a C?

The consumer had plenty of choices made by Samsung & Google LG etc. if you wanted a C connector there it was for you.

EU Eurocrats are micro detailing how private businesses should operate and that's a hell of a slippery slope if there ever was one.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28709 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 6:44 am to
quote:

Just because it's a "closed" system doesn't make it a monopoly.
Even if it did, just being a monopoly is no problem. Abusing that position is a problem.
quote:

What monopoly did Apple have over the lighting connector that the EU recently forced to change to a C?

The consumer had plenty of choices made by Samsung & Google LG etc. if you wanted a C connector there it was for you.

EU Eurocrats are micro detailing how private businesses should operate and that's a hell of a slippery slope if there ever was one.
You are conflating issues now. The charger thing was not an antitrust suit targeting Apple, that was a market-wide rule to reduce waste.
Posted by TU Rob
Birmingham
Member since Nov 2008
12740 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:00 am to
quote:

The charger thing was not an antitrust suit targeting Apple, that was a market-wide rule to reduce waste.


Not that it really matters to me because I use a couple of different magnet chargers, but Apple having to use USB-C is going to be great. We have an iPad with the C charger, all my kids have a Kindle Fire tablet with a C charger, wife's personal and work Macbooks have a C charger, my Dell laptop has a C charger, and the only devices we have without that are the iPhones. Some things are just better having a universal system across all devices and brands.

I've tried to convince my wife and daughter that wireless chargers are better and have less wear and tear on the phone, but they both just have to have a thick clunky case and one of those card slot wallets attached to the back of their phones. I don't know how many charging cables they've broken off because they plug it in and keep scrolling on them. With the magnet it just sits on the back.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11223 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:16 am to
quote:

You are conflating issues now. The charger thing was not an antitrust suit targeting Apple, that was a market-wide rule to reduce waste.


?

I never mentioned a monopoly. I was complaining about the EU ruling; you brought up monopolistic practices in that context.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28709 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 9:22 am to
quote:

?

I never mentioned a monopoly. I was complaining about the EU ruling; you brought up monopolistic practices in that context.
You said they were hammering Apple pretty hard. Are you saying you were talking about the charger port thing?
Posted by Fat Batman
Gotham City, NJ
Member since Oct 2019
1382 posts
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

you brought up monopolistic practices in that context.


maybe you didnt realize it but the supporting messaging protocols and opening apps up are antitrust issues and are related to maintaining a level competitive landscape.
Posted by wheelr
Member since Jul 2012
5147 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 10:09 am to
I run a community built version of AOSP that focuses on privacy.

Android is the only OS that offers that freedom. Though Linux phones are trying to get traction.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33446 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 12:31 pm to
I have been Android since the beginning, but I still think 90% is just whichever one you happen to learn and integrate into your life. All I ever hear is "Apple is so intuitive" and "it just works". But anytime I'm forced to handle an iPhone, I find it so un-intuitive, that I basically stare at it blankly. I think iPhone people would say the same thing about Android.

I still think the 2 biggest things missing from Android are:

--a workable analog of AirDrop
--a messaging service that has more fulsome capability like iMessage (I think I heard iMessage was going to start integrating/allowing Android users?)

I still come across situations where an iOS user sees me do something on Android that they are amazed at -and then I find my own self amazed at how it's possible that iOS doesn't have it. Most recently, I think that was on WiFi where I used the QR code function to share the connection.

This one is minor, but still sort of WTF: iOS has a feature to turn your lock/home screen wallpaper into basically a random scroll of your photos. Android DOES NOT HAVE THIS! Is it just me, or does that seem like 2004 level feature?

I also think Google Photos is RADICALLY SUPERIOR to everything else.

Oh, and I hate how whichever way the photo/video is sent via text, it down-converts to super shitty, yet people ALWAYS blame this just on Android.
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9408 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Do Apple people only use one type of messaging or something?

The whole “green text messages” thing goes back a long way. While it’s largely meaningless in 2024, that was not always the case.

When Apple rolled out iMessage back in 2011, many people were still paying fees (or subject to limits) on SMS. So basically any text messages you sent to other iPhones became free. That’s probably where the stigma started, because you knew “green messages” were hitting your cellular plan as SMS/MMS. I don’t think major US carriers really charge for SMS/MMS nowadays so I think it’s become largely meaningless from that perspective.

The other, more recent change is group text messages. Group texts among iPhone users have always worked very well via iMessage. For a long time, a non-Apple phone could break a group text chat. I honestly have no idea if this was an issue with certain Android phones, people having old flip phones, carriers not handling group MMS correctly, or what.

The last point of stigma is that iPhones default to iMessage when you send a text to a phone number that’s tied to an iPhone.. as long as the iMessage can be delivered. So when you’re texting friends/family with iPhones you get a blue bubble and a “delivered” notification when the message goes through. If the message can’t be delivered due to cellular issues, someone’s phone being dead, or whatever, it defaults back to SMS/MMS and turns the bubble green. Which creates a bit of positive/negative connotation around the bubble colors.

To answer your actual question - yes Apple people only use one type of messaging because iMessage is automatic when you text a cell phone number tied to an iPhone. So there’s no conscious decision to send a message one way or another unless you’re using iMessage on a computer, iPad, or something along those lines.
Posted by Fat Batman
Gotham City, NJ
Member since Oct 2019
1382 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

yes Apple people only use one type of messaging because iMessage is automatic when you text a cell phone number tied to an iPhone.


I think what he means is using another app for messaging. i get the feeling only in the US is using the native text messaging app a person's first reach for messaging someone. Seems like when I travel everyone is using Whatsapp or other messaging/DMs through various socials. they dont use the phone's native texting app or other sms/mms app. using a native app could also just be an older person thing since thats what we grew up on.
This post was edited on 3/14/24 at 3:29 pm
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28709 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

using a native app could also just be an older person thing since thats what we grew up on.
"Older" people didn't grow up with apps at all gtfo of here
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51432 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 3:39 pm to
Exactly. Amazing how much apple ripped off from BlackBerry
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422651 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Seems like when I travel everyone is using Whatsapp or other messaging/DMs through various socials.

This is what I meant.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33446 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Exactly. Amazing how much apple ripped off from BlackBerry
And Android. I remember how excited the fanboys were to get a pull down menu on iOS. I was like, you mean the very definition of smartphone interface?

ALSO, they pissed themselves when Siri came out and I was like, um Google voice-to-text has been more advanced than this for YEARS!

And my favorite - through the iPhone 5, lots of shade was thrown at larger phones and so-called "phablets". Why would anyone need something so big? They're ugly! etc. Then the 6 came out - and the fanboys PISSED THEMSELVES over how great and innovative it was to have a larger phone.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11223 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

maybe you didnt realize it but the supporting messaging protocols and opening apps up are antitrust issues and are related to maintaining a level competitive landscape.



Are you saying there isn;t a competitive landscape between Google and Apple?
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9408 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Seems like when I travel everyone is using Whatsapp or other messaging/DMs through various socials. they dont use the phone's native texting app or other sms/mms app.

I could be wrong, but I believe this is at least partially because MMS/SMS fees are much more common in other parts of the world, combined with the fact that Android has a much larger market share internationally than in the US.
Posted by Fat Batman
Gotham City, NJ
Member since Oct 2019
1382 posts
Posted on 3/14/24 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

you saying there isn;t a competitive landscape between Google and Apple?


I mean forcing app creators to go through the app store and sandboxing messages from other phone users into a degraded experience is anti competitive in nature.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
11223 posts
Posted on 3/15/24 at 8:19 am to
quote:

sandboxing messages from other phone users into a degraded experience is anti competitive in nature.


There's nothing anti-competitive about it. Just the opposite. It just pisses Android users off. Consumers have a choice. Don't like Apple's sandbox iMessaging switch to Android.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram