Started By
Message

re: If the US hosts another World Cup what would the venues be?

Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:20 pm to
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Once a country gets the bid, how are the venues selected? Do the final 21 bid on it or does some random committee name them.



For a US bid the process would be different b/c we have so many able cities.

Most typical bids are their 12 or less cities and thats it.

Im sure FIFA would sit down and look at what places are best for foreign people to go and where FIFA can make the most money
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53031 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Of course your bias makes you stand up for Houston


I'm actually not a fan of large urban sprawl but it's the closest one to me with a shot.

One thing that is not bias though is it's infrastructure is better than Bmore, Denver, and Philly. Yes I've been to all these places. If Texas does one thing right it's roads.
This post was edited on 6/22/14 at 1:25 pm
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

One thing that is not bias though is it's infrastructure is better than Bmore, Denver, and Philly. Yes I've been to all these places. If Texas does one thing right it's roads.



Houston wins over Bmore 100%

but roads isn't a big deal b/c most fans would stay in the heart of the city they are visiting the bigger issue is getting them to our stadiums which most of them are in the suburbs now days and not in the heart of the city.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53031 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

where FIFA can make the most money


I just think Houston would be a cash cow. Not just the Latinos but with the oil industry you have tons of Middle Eastern people, Brits, you name it, it really is a very international city overall.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

I just think Houston would be a cash cow. Not just the Latinos but with the oil industry you have tons of Middle Eastern people, Brits, you name it, it really is a very international city overall.



Like I said before ticket sales rely heavily on the locals. Thats why the city's sports culture is a factor.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53031 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

bigger issue is getting them to our stadiums which most of them are in the suburbs now days and not in the heart of the city.


Another plus for Houston, Reliant is downtown and easily accessible.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126858 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Another plus for Houston, Reliant is downtown and easily accessible.



yes it is

i wish more american stadiums were like that
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53031 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:29 pm to
Is the ATL's new stadium going to be downtown like the Dome, because that was one of the easiest stadiums I've ever gotten to.
Posted by joey barton
Member since Feb 2011
11468 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:32 pm to
I think right next to it
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

Is the ATL's new stadium going to be downtown like the Dome, because that was one of the easiest stadiums I've ever gotten to.
It will literally be right next to the Dome.

And anyone thinking Nashville will host over Atlanta is crazy. Atlanta will beat out Nashville 99 out of 100 times.
This post was edited on 6/22/14 at 1:50 pm
Posted by Buckeye Fan 19
Member since Dec 2007
36761 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:55 pm to
I'm pretty surprised Soldier Field didn't make the cut.

Anyway, if I could choose, my choice for the 12 stadiums out of the 21 listed would be:

Rose Bowl (LA)
FedEx Field (D.C.)
MetLife Stadium (NYC)
SunLife Stadium (Miami)
Reliant (Houston)
Invesco (Denver)
LP Field (Nashville)
CenturyLink (Seattle)
Georgia Dome (Atlanta)
Gillette (Boston)
Lincoln Financial Field (Philly)
Lucas Oil (Indy)

Hits our biggest cities (besides Chicago, again, don't know why it wasn't there), the best "tourist" spots, most geographical diversity, etc., plus the capital.

I tried to choose no more than one in a state, and chose, for the most part, the best stadium in a state. (Three exceptions: Miami over Tampa and Houston over Dallas, because of the international communities, and Washington over Baltimore because D.C. is the capital).
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
97289 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 1:59 pm to
quote:


And anyone thinking Nashville will host over Atlanta is crazy. Atlanta will beat out Nashville 99 out of 100 times.





It's what would happen, just not what should happen.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
97289 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

dude nashville is awesome but you dont get to be a WC venue because the bars are a little bit cooler than another city's.



Not just the bars. Atlanta is a pretty awful time.
Posted by SoGaFan
Member since Jan 2008
5956 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

It will literally be right next to the Dome.

And anyone thinking Nashville will host over Atlanta is crazy. Atlanta will beat out Nashville 99 out of 100 times.

Most definitely, it has the hotel rooms as a convention city and an INTL airport that is easily assessable with public transportation and downtown. Also, ATL gets plenty of crap like all cities, but it is fairly compact for visitors and there are a lot of nice, easy places to eat/ enjoy nightlife ( Midtown/VA Highlands/Inman Park that are all pretty close to downtown center.

Nashville has a great downtown vibe as well, but it just isn't even close when discussing ease of travel from INTL locations. Also, plenty of countries have at least official representatives in the ATL area.
This post was edited on 6/22/14 at 2:01 pm
Posted by Nimbus2000
Member since Jun 2013
1250 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

The ones they listed in the bid for 2022.


I almost judge them for even considering Legion Field.
Posted by LL012697
Texas
Member since May 2013
4045 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

It rains in Seattle and no retractable roof


Seattle has arguably one of the nicest and most comfortable summers in the country. The rest of the year sucks but during World Cup time rain would not be a factor
Posted by Indfanfromcol
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
14936 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 2:13 pm to
If you really can't find something to do in Atlanta, then you are trying harder to not have fun than the other way around.

Sorry the locations won't be based off which cities has the best bars.
Posted by blkhawktiger
Glad All Over
Member since Nov 2011
2014 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 2:39 pm to
I brought Nashville up and am late to defend it but nonetheless....

Yes ATL has a better 'big event' infrastructure than Nashville. But, it's not like Nashville's is totally non-existant. I never meant to compare the two. The great thing about the way the city is set up is that it was built to host big events downtown. From the number of hotels to LP field being on the river (pedestrian bridge across from downtown) to the super-modern downtown convention center that is massive.... The area around Broadway has been developed to handle these kinds of things.

Nashville could most certainly host a few WC matches. It would be one of the last selections (no doubt behind ATL) but it would deserve to be selected at the end. The city has a history of fighting for and supporting such events. Those saying it couldn't handle it obviously haven't spent time there anytime recently.


This post was edited on 6/22/14 at 2:42 pm
Posted by Indfanfromcol
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
14936 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 3:19 pm to
I personally love Nashville. And I think it could be considered a WC spot.
One thing I wonder though is that since the city is so centered around country music culture, would that help or hinder their chances of getting a WC spot.

I ultimately think it could help, but to put Nashville over ATL is absurd. Someone needs to get past their nfl bias.
Posted by blkhawktiger
Glad All Over
Member since Nov 2011
2014 posts
Posted on 6/22/14 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

One thing I wonder though is that since the city is so centered around country music culture, would that help or hinder their chances of getting a WC spot.


10-15 years ago, it would hurt the city's chances. Now, it's too diverse to label it In such a narrow stereotype. It's completely changed in the last 15 years and is absolutely booming.

quote:

to put Nashville over ATL is absurd


I didn't. I said ATL would be selected first no doubt.

quote:

Someone needs to get past their nfl bias.


Wtf?
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram