- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If the US hosts another World Cup what would the venues be?
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:21 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:21 pm to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
The Southeast would be cool. Have matches in Miami, New Orleans, Atlanta, Houston, etc
no chance
esp for NOLA
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:21 pm to Dandy Lion
The answer is Manaus to Porto Alegre.
Porto Alegre is further south than Curitiba. Plus, Manaus is really out there.
quote:
Probably Curitiba-Fortaleza.
Porto Alegre is further south than Curitiba. Plus, Manaus is really out there.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:22 pm to blkhawktiger
quote:
Atlanta, Houston, and Nashville would do very very well as southern sites for a WC in the US.
I agree but people from other countries don't come to visit Houston and Nashville. This is about the best cities who host and we only have 12 to pick.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:22 pm to BOSCEAUX
if brazil has game sin manaus we should construct a venue in like bismarck or some shite
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:22 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
Atlanta will be a venue if the world cup comes to the states. guaranteed.
Not arguing it wouldn't be, I just think Reliant would be a top 5 venue for a WC in the US. Plus it's only 2 hours from my house.
I would put in Houston before Denver. What were the host cities in 94?
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:23 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Nashville is one of the South's best cities.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:24 pm to StraightCashHomey21
I think having Boston, NYC, Philly, Washington, and Baltimore would be awesome. Five venues that are all quite drive able (except for that traffic).
It probably could be done by keeping it on the east of the Mississippi. Atlanta, Minneapolis, Indy, Miami, Tampa, Charlotte, and Chicago could be all choices. There are still plenty of other stadiums.
What are the rules regarding domes?
It probably could be done by keeping it on the east of the Mississippi. Atlanta, Minneapolis, Indy, Miami, Tampa, Charlotte, and Chicago could be all choices. There are still plenty of other stadiums.
What are the rules regarding domes?
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:24 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
but people from other countries don't come to visit Houston and Nashville. This is about the best cities who host and we only have 12 to pick.
Then if a pitch can fit in the Superdome it would have to be in NOLA. If stuff to do other than watch games is a criteria. WTF you going to do in Denver in the summer? Houston is ahead in that category.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:25 pm to S
quote:
if brazil has game sin manaus we should construct a venue in like bismarck or some shite
Nome, Alaska IMO
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:25 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
I just think Reliant would be a top 5 venue for a WC in the US
no
quote:
I would put in Houston before Denver
big no
quote:
What were the host cities in 94?
There was 9
DC
NYC
Boston
LA
Dallas
Detroit
Orlando
San Fran
all have new stadiums pretty much
swap orlando with Miami add Seattle, Denver and ATL and were done
This post was edited on 6/22/14 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:26 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:not going to happen thougj
Then if a pitch can fit in the Superdome it would have to be in NOLA. If stuff to do other than watch games is a criteria
quote:
WTF you going to do in Denver in the summer? Houston is ahead in that category.
are you serious denver is a much better city that houston
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:26 pm to S
quote:
if brazil has game sin manaus we should construct a venue in like bismarck or some
Anchorage or Honolulu.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:26 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Nashville would be a much better option than Atlanta
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:27 pm to Dandy Lion
Houston is kind of a no brainer to me.
Transportation is easy
Stadium is nice
Good soccer interest
Most diverse city in America
4th largest city in America
Plenty of hotels, entertainment, and food
Transportation is easy
Stadium is nice
Good soccer interest
Most diverse city in America
4th largest city in America
Plenty of hotels, entertainment, and food
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:27 pm to bbap
quote:
Nashville would be a much better option than Atlanta
Not with the new stadium being built in ATL.
ATL has much better infrastructure for holding these events than Nashville
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:28 pm to WreckinRams05
Yeah but no Americans live in Houston
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:28 pm to WreckinRams05
quote:
Houston is kind of a no brainer to me.
no one is arguing Houston wouldn't be good its just behind in the pecking order.
To many homers in here.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:28 pm to bbap
nashville is cooler than atlanta, but that doesnt make it a better option to be a WC venue
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:28 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Not with the new stadium being built in ATL
Yes still. Nashville blows Atlanta out the water. It's actually not even close.
Popular
Back to top


0





