- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If the US hosts another World Cup what would the venues be?
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:29 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:29 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
are you serious denver is a much better city that houston
Not based on stuff to do in the summer that is within driving distance. Houston out Museums Denver, Out beaches Denver (Galveston), Out fishes Denver, Both have baseball, Casinos right across the state line......
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:30 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Yeah, I just looked it up. 94 WC had matches from New Jersey to Orlando to Detroit & Los Angeles
Why even argue about cities, cause the whole country hosts the games
Why even argue about cities, cause the whole country hosts the games
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:30 pm to bbap
quote:
Yes still. Nashville blows Atlanta out the water. It's actually not even close.
what???
ATL big event infrastructure >>>>>>>>> Nashville this isn't even debatable.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:30 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
nashville is cooler than atlanta, but that doesnt make it a better option to be a WC venue
That's precisely why.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:31 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:not no but frick no
Detroit
quote:Miami instead
Orlando
quote:
add Seattle, Houston and ATL and were done
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:31 pm to bbap
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:31 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
Not based on stuff to do in the summer that is within driving distance.
fans are there to drink
quote:
. Houston out Museums Denver, Out beaches Denver (Galveston), Out fishes Denver, Both have baseball, Casinos right across the state line......
most fan would not partake in any of that and no europeans are going to Galveston for the beach.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:32 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
not no but frick no
um it hosted last time
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:33 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
well i hope charleston and savannah get to be venues as well
Yeah that comparison makes sense. Two cities that could in no way host. Not comparable to nashville at all.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:34 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
are you serious denver is a much better city that houston
Plus Denver's airport is haunted and has Nazi shite all in it. Houston wins.
Also Houston has 2 airports.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:34 pm to bbap
quote:
Not comparable to nashville at all.
Thinking Nashville has the infrastructure to be a better host than Atlanta is delusional.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:35 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
Plus Denver's airport is haunted and has Nazi shite all in it. Houston wins.
Also Houston has 2 airports.
Sorry man Houston would be nice but its chances are not as "high" as Denvers
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:36 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
um it hosted last time
Any city that's fricking bankrupt shouldn't be allowed to do shite. Detroit is the hell hole of US big cities. 20 years makes a difference. Reliant didn't exist 20 years ago and that will be the tipping point. I don't think Detroit was one of the 21 finalist venues anyway.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:37 pm to BOSCEAUX
Detroit not one of the finalist so Houston and Denver can both host and everybody is happy. 
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:37 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Nashville's infrastructure is plenty good enough. I never said it was better than Atlanta's.
If you can't follow along just don't reply.
Nashville over Atlanta because the city is awesome and atlanta is well...not. Not because of the airport, hotels, mass transit, etc is better.
If you can't follow along just don't reply.
Nashville over Atlanta because the city is awesome and atlanta is well...not. Not because of the airport, hotels, mass transit, etc is better.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:37 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
I don't think Detroit was one of the 21 finalist venues anyway.
actually it wasn't which is odd so that would go to Philly, KC or some where else.
Dallas hosting hurts Houston
This post was edited on 6/22/14 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:39 pm to bbap
quote:
Nashville's infrastructure is plenty good enough. I never said it was better than Atlanta's.
But thats a major factor in host cities
quote:
If you can't follow along just don't reply.
clearly you can't keep up
quote:
Nashville over Atlanta because the city is awesome and atlanta is well...not. Not because of the airport, hotels, mass transit, etc is better.
All those things you listed are reasons why ATL> Nashville.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:39 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
fans are there to drink
The FIFA should build a stadium in NOLA and have every match there over a 3 month period.
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:40 pm to StraightCashHomey21
It's like I'm speaking to a child.
Nashville is more than competent with their infrastructure. But once you are in the city and partying you are either in nashville or Atlanta. idiot for not being able to follow the argument.
But but but but infrastructure!!!
Nashville is more than competent with their infrastructure. But once you are in the city and partying you are either in nashville or Atlanta. idiot for not being able to follow the argument.
But but but but infrastructure!!!
This post was edited on 6/22/14 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 6/22/14 at 12:40 pm to BOSCEAUX
quote:
The FIFA should build a stadium in NOLA and have every match there over a 3 month period.
Tulane should have built a bigger stadium
Popular
Back to top



2


