Posted by
Message
Jjdoc
Columbia Fan
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
41730 posts

Zuckerberg’s CTCL had the night of her life in CO. Came from 15 points down and won by 20

quote:

On Tuesday a no-name political operative who sits on the Board of Directors for Mark Zuckerberg’s private election mafia the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) won the Republican primary Secretary of State race in Colorado.

Popular conservative and MAGA candidate Tina Peters was leading in the polls and had a 15 point lead on her closest competitor Pam Anderson.

But Pam Anderson from Zuckerberg’s CTCL had the night of her life and defeated Peters by 20 points.



This is an excellent report by Emerald Robinson — one of the most fearless and accurate reporters in America today.




quote:

The story of the GOP primary race for Secretary of State in Colorado gets more interesting the more you investigate the results.

As I noted yesterday, the big news is that an Australian businessman named Mike O’Donnell somehow got 28% of the vote (173,000 citizens voted for him!) even though polling showed he had no support, he raised $4,700 for his campaign, and 139 people were following his campaign on Twitter. The most interaction he got on his 1,300 campaign tweets was 4 “likes” on his June 27th tweet; most of them had zero interaction. He went from being a non-factor in a three-person race to grabbing more than quarter of the total vote.


Mike O’Donnell seems like a very nice guy — but can anyone explain his sudden 28% share of the vote in the most important election integrity race in Colorado? Election officials in Colorado had no explanation. Most of the county clerks in the 17 counties that Mike O’Donnell won had never heard of him. Their reactions ranged from confusion to disbelief.


But, wait, there’s more.


quote:

The really big news is that Pam Anderson supposedly won the race with 43% of the vote (266,000 citizens voted for her!) which is an unbelievable result — to say the very least.

It’s truly unbelievable because two months before the primary, Pam Anderson was not just losing to Tina Peters in all the polling and fundraising metrics, but her campaign was broke. She had a $5,665 balance in her campaign coffers. According to liberal site Colorado Pols, “this surprisingly anemic fundraising is just more evidence that [Pam Anderson] is a candidate without a constituency…”

Two days after that assessment, Colorado Pols considered Anderson’s campaign dead-on-arrival and added that: “Peters’ strong performance further underscores Anderson’s weakness in this race, running on a message not just disagreed with but considered treasonous by a majority of Republican voters.”



The day of the primary, the enthusiasm for Pam Anderson was, shall we say, underwhelming on social media.



quote:

You must remember that Tina Peters got 61% of the delegates at Colorado’s Republican Assembly in April. What about Pam Anderson — you ask?

Pam Anderson did not even attend the Republican assembly. She was so unpopular in the Colorado GOP that she was a write-in candidate who only qualified in April. She had to collect 1,000 valid signatures from registered Republicans in each of the state’s eight congressional districts just to get on the ballot. In the 5th Congressional District, Anderson managed only 1,282 valid signatures. Apparently, more than 5,000 of the 17,904 signatures submitted by Anderson were not valid.

In other words, Pam Anderson was not a wildly popular candidate among Republicans.

So how did Pam Anderson suddenly pull off a miraculous 35 point swing on Primary Day two months later with no money and no endorsements?


The only advantage that Pam Anderson had in this race: she’s on the Board of Directors for Mark Zuckerberg’s private election mafia, the “Center For Tech And Civic Life.”



Isn’t it strange that the director of Mark Zuckerberg’s private election charity for Democrats (on temporary leave!) just won the most important election integrity race in Colorado — and a GOP primary no less — as a write-in candidate with a 35 point polling swing with no money and no visible support from Republicans?

One more thing: Colorado uses Dominion Voting Machines.




LINK


The Maj
Alabama Fan
Member since Sep 2016
22413 posts

Write in candidate? No way in hell in a State wide race…


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
602
mtntiger
LSU Fan
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
23358 posts

Move along. Nothing to see here.

No evidence. No standing.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
732
the808bass
SE Missouri Fan
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
97819 posts
 Online 

There’s no evidence.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
292
jawnybnsc
LSU Fan
Greer, SC
Member since Dec 2016
3352 posts

Hacked again.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
202
xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts

Jesus. Just more evidence our elections are fricked. Get rid of the machines. Audit every damn election. Real forensic audits too


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
792
ABearsFanNMS
The Citadel Fan
tLandmass or NE South America
Member since Oct 2014
14701 posts
 Online 

This has a stench so bad it would make a wild boar vomit!


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
402
swolverine
Michigan Fan
Member since Jun 2020
1710 posts
 Online 

quote:

Pam Anderson



Replies (0)
Replies (0)
133
FooManChoo
Georgia Fan
Member since Dec 2012
35793 posts

Anderson wasn’t a write-in candidate but was on the ballot. That said, I found it incredibly strange that Peters didn’t win.


cwill
Member since Jan 2005
49686 posts

quote:

This is an excellent report by Emerald Robinson — one of the most fearless and accurate reporters in America today.


Working for gateway pundit? Honest?


TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors
Advertisement
ReauxlTide222
Alabama Fan
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
74509 posts

What’s the most logical explanation a left leaning person could give for this?

Like what would HHTM or Hank say about this?


xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts

Please tell me it’s being investigated. These wild arse anomalies happened during the presidential election too. Nothing made sense


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
392
Eli Goldfinger
Army Fan
Member since Sep 2016
28815 posts

Holy sh!t

It’s time to burn it all down


Placekicker
US Space Force Fan
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
3357 posts

This is what we can expect nationwide in November, unless we do something.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
472
AggieHank86
Texas A&M Fan
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
30860 posts
 Online 

Several factors to consider:

1. Mike O’Donnell was the only male in a 3-person race against two women. Like it or not, that got him some votes.

2. Pam Anderson has name recognition, even if she is not THAT Pam Anderson. People are idiots.

3. Anderson was NOT a “write-in. This is misinformation. She was on the ballot.

I am not saying “don’t investigate.” I am simply saying that “fraud” is not the ONLY possibility. Some minds go straight to fraud and conspiracy. Thoughtful people examine ALL of the possibilities.
This post was edited on 7/2 at 8:35 am


the808bass
SE Missouri Fan
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
97819 posts
 Online 

quote:

Working for gateway pundit? Honest?


cwill don’t read so good.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
201
canyon
Colorado Fan
FL Keys/Coloweedeaux/ParaDiceTwice
Member since Dec 2003
14993 posts
 Online 

It's like, well, magic. Just another day in the programmed cheating that will be the norm from now on.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
101
Jjdoc
Columbia Fan
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
41730 posts

quote:

Holy sh!t

It’s time to burn it all down



The guy that got 28%.... WTH??




Replies (0)
Replies (0)
42
jimmy the leg
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2007
24267 posts

quote:

Isn’t it strange that the director of Mark Zuckerberg’s private election charity for Democrats (on temporary leave!) just won the most important election integrity race in Colorado — and a GOP primary no less — as a write-in candidate with a 35 point polling swing with no money and no visible support from Republicans?


It is only strange if you believe that the integrity of the election process. I don’t.

quote:

Colorado uses Dominion Voting Machines.





Replies (0)
Replies (0)
241
jimmy the leg
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2007
24267 posts

quote:


Working for gateway pundit? Honest?


Is the info in the article incorrect? No.

So a dismissive deflection without substance?

Do your hamstrings from all of the goose-stepping?

This post was edited on 7/2 at 8:34 am


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7next pagelast page

Back to top

logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram