Started By
Message

re: Zuckerberg’s CTCL had the night of her life in CO. Came from 15 points down and won by 20

Posted on 7/2/22 at 2:40 pm to
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56380 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 2:40 pm to
quote:

I said repeatedly that I would not take my children to attend these events.


No chance your children (if you have any) have you in their lives.

Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

No chance your children (if you have any) have you in their lives.
You are mistaken.
Posted by LSUAngelHere1
Watson
Member since Jan 2018
8117 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 2:46 pm to
Hence why I am always reminding everyone that you can’t vote yourself out of communism. The ONLY way to overthrow it is through bloodshed.

God help us all.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39108 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

you can’t vote yourself out of communism. The ONLY way to overthrow it is through bloodshed.

I can name a dozen countries who got rid of communism without bloodshed. Start with Russia and East Germany.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

I can name a dozen countries who got rid of communism without bloodshed. Start with Russia and East Germany.

Both had rivers of blood shed getting rid of communism.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
48854 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

I can name a dozen countries who got rid of communism without bloodshed. Start with Russia and East Germany.


Keep going.
Posted by BigMob
Georgia
Member since Oct 2021
7625 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

Working for gateway pundit?


Yeah GP lost all credibility when they propagated that Russia collusion hoax …oh wait, snap !
Posted by LSUAngelHere1
Watson
Member since Jan 2018
8117 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

I c an name a dozen countries who got rid of communism without bloodshed. Start with Russia and East Germany.

Are you really such a stupid SOB or just a compulsive liar?
Posted by Isaiahprophet
Member since Jun 2022
248 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:30 pm to
Explain
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15356 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

You are mistaken.
Suing you for support?

I suppose that qualifies….
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
48854 posts
Posted on 7/2/22 at 10:39 pm to
New guy coming in all hot.

quote:

Isaiahprophet
Member since Jun 2022
56 posts
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39108 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Both had rivers of blood shed getting rid of communism.

Baloney!

Communism resulted in rivers of bloodshed. That ended. Decades went by of stagnation. And finally the eastern bloc fell apart. Very little bloodshed.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 9:17 am to
quote:

No chance your children (if you have any) have you in their lives.
quote:

You are mistaken.
quote:

Suing you for support? I suppose that qualifies….


Is this the reasoned, logical discussion that you say you crave? LINK

Just askin’

FYI, I have two daughters, 12 and 14. We do things together every day. Our current project is bonsai trees. They are the kids that their teachers hold-up as examples and that other parents want around their kids as a good example. I am certainly not a perfect person, but I am an exemplary father.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 9:22 am
Posted by Mr. Misanthrope
Cloud 8
Member since Nov 2012
5470 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 9:38 am to
quote:

SoCons are reactionary little authoritarians, who live to use the coercive power of government to impose their social mores upon those who do not share them.

This is curious. The power of the state supporting homosexual marriage is a good thing then, even if it is imposing social mores upon many who believe it is detrimental to society’s well being?

Given this has led to coercion of “butchers, bakers, and candle stick makers” to provide services for celebrations they wish to not support, for consciences sake, you do or don’t support these unfortunate tradespersons who have had the coercive power of the state unleashed upon them to enforce social mores?


To describe a part of my political philosophy, I use the term “advocate of limited government” solely to avoid sharing even the WORD “conservative” with SoCon scum.

This too is curious.

I’m assuming because of your advocacy of limited government you would have supported the Southern states rights to secede? In the interests of limited self government? Certainly they believed themselves at least as put upon by the Northern states train of abuses as the Colonies nearly a hundred years earlier were of mad King George’s?


This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 10:12 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421746 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 9:44 am to
quote:

What’s the most logical explanation a left leaning person could give for this?

This board has, correctly, railed on polling for 8 years now. That would probably be my first point if I was creating a PR response.
Posted by salty1
Member since Jun 2015
4427 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 9:46 am to
But…everyone believes there will be some national red wave come November. 2020 showed us that they will do whatever is necessary to sway elections. The two years since has showed them that the American people will not do a damn thing to stop them. We’re fricked folks…unless something changes.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 9:47 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421746 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 9:50 am to
Look, I have been very bearish on these claims of election fraud b/c there was a much more logical explanation (mail-in voting + ballot harvesting due to relaxed rules from CV19). If we don't have any other sort of scheme or there isn't some huge GOP gaffe before November, AND the GOP doesn't have a red wave, I'll start to believe the conspiracy theories a lot more.
Posted by cyarrr
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2017
3324 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:13 am to
The article talks about polling numbers but doesn’t link or reference the pollsters, at least from what I read.

Can you identify them? I’d be interested in seeing these polls before accepting the writer’s unvetted version as the truth.

Especially when considering the other errors he made in the article.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421746 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:16 am to
quote:

The article talks about polling numbers but doesn’t link or reference the pollsters, at least from what I read.

Welcome to the Gateway Pundit
Posted by BFIV
Virginia
Member since Apr 2012
7709 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 10:22 am to
quote:

I have been very bearish on these claims of election fraud b/c there was a much more logical explanation (mail-in voting + ballot harvesting due to relaxed rules from CV19).


Well, those are the two main tools of the election fraud, in my opinion. Without those two, Biden would still be in his basement, eating ice cream and dreaming of little girls.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram